Table 3:

Mechanical properties predicted by the present model compared to reported data

Age range	$E$ [GPa]	${\sigma }_y$ [MPa]	${ϵ}_y$ [%]	${\sigma }_{\mathit{\text{ult}}}$ [MPa]	${ϵ}_{\mathit{\text{ult}}}$ [%]	$U_T$	Notes [MJ/m3]
Predicted:
20–60	18.2	101	0.73	113	1.18	2.34	(Case 1)
60+	16.0	89.3	0.67	106	0.95	1.63	(Case 2)
Measured:
46–99	18.16 (1.88)	84.52 (10.47)	0.67 (0.04)	92.95 (10.07)	1.9 (0.6)	1.49 (0.55)	Proximal femur [6]
49–56	18.5 (1.5)			104.9 (8.2)		2.73 (0.73)
72–90	18.2 (1.4)	-	-	96.8 (6.2)	-	1.36 (0.34)	Tibia [49]
20–60	12.0–22.3	44.9–111	0.42–0.69	70.2–164	1.26–4.94	0.769–6.14	“RiKo TQQl
60–99	8.2–20.7	28.0–97.1	0.33–0.62	36.2–134	0.81–3.57	0.285–3.33	Ribs [39]

Values corresponding to elderly specimens are labeled by italics, and standard deviations placed in parentheses.