Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Jul 17;103:109–118. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2023.07.009

Table 3.

Device assessment tool results for all twelve subjects.

Subject Height (cm) CT or X-ray Component of Device B0 (T) Normalized B1+(%) Normalized (B1+)2 (%) dB/dz (T/m)

1 157.5 CT IPG 1.8* <4.6 <0.2 7.48
Lead Tip 1.4 <4.6 <0.2 6.14
2 158.2 CT IPG 2.1* 4.6487 0.216 7.22
Lead Tip 2.9* 14.0965 1.9871 0
3 156.1 CT IPG 1.7* <4.6 <0.2 6.86
Lead Tip 1.3 <4.6 <0.2 5.48
4 158.5 X-ray Lead Bottom 2.6* 5.6095 0.3147 5.1
Lead Tip 3* 15.2462 2.3245 0
5 162.6 X-ray IPG 1.75* <4.6 <0.2 7.22
Lead Tip 2.9* 12.8254 1.6449 0
6 167.5 IR X-ray IPG 1.25 <4.6 <0.2 5.32
Lead Tip 2.85* 10.207 1.0418 0
7 175.4 X-ray Lead Bottom 2.75* 6.5459 0.4285 4.72
Lead Tip 3* 15.8469 2.5112 0
8 182.9 No CT or X-ray IPG - - - -
Lead Tip - - - -
9 157 No CT or X-ray IPG - - - -
Lead Tip - - - -
10 184.1 X-ray Lead Bottom 2.9* 14.0965 1.9871 0
Lead Tip 3* 16.2956 2.6555 0
11 184.6 CT IPG 0.9 <4.6 <0.2 4
Lead Tip 0.7 <4.6 <0.2 0
12 151 CT IPG 1.9* 4.5688 0.2087 7.66
Lead Tip 1.55* <4.6 <0.2 6.46
*

Board-certified MR physicist determined the excess B0 on the C3T posed no significant risk to the patient in accordance with our IRB-approved protocol. IPG: Implantable pulse generator