Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 18;30(9):8563–8574. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090621

Table 1.

Patients and treatment characteristics.

5-FU-Based
CT Treatment
N = 95
Capecitabine-Based CT Treatment
N = 62
p-Value
Characteristics n % n %
Age (years), median (range) 61 (38–90) 67 (39–93) 0.0048
Sex
Male
Female

17
78

17.89
82.11

10
52

16.13
83.87

0.8316
ECOG performance status
0
1–2

91
4

95.79
4.21

57
5

91.94
8.06

0.3192
History of pelvis/obstetric surgery
Yes
No/unknown

49
46

51.58
48.42

25
37

40.32
59.68

0.1925
T-classification
1–2
3
4

60
22
13

63.16
23.16
13.68

36
19
7

58.06
30.65
11.29

0.5583
N-classification
0
1
2–3

41
21
33

43.16
22.10
34.74

31
12
19

50.00
19.35
30.65

0.7389
HPV status
Negative
Positive
Missing

3
25
67

3.16
26.31
70.53

3
36
23

4.84
58.06
37.10

<0.001
HIV status
Negative
Positive
Missing

21
2
72

22.10
2.11
75.79

29
2
31

46.77
3.23
50.00

0.0020
SCC tumor marker
Normal
Elevated
Unknown

35
23
37

36.84
24.21
38.95

25
14
23

40.32
22.58
37.10
0.9342
Radiation technique: boost-integrated
Yes
No

86
9

90.53
9.47

57
5

91.94
8.06

1.0000
Median RT treatment days (range) 52 (46–78) 52 (43–79) 0.7949
RT interruptions > 3 days
Yes
No

17
78

17.89
82.11

8
54

12.90
87.10

0.5053
Median duration of RT interruption (range), days 6 (4–25) 9.5 (5–20) 0.0203
Chemotherapy dose reduction
Yes
No

38
57

40.00
60.00

28
34

45.16
54.84

0.6200
Capecitabine or 5FU dose received
<50%
50–75%
75–100%
100%

1
12
25
57

1.05
12.63
26.32
60.00

6
10
12
34

9.68
16.13
19.35
54.84
0.0641