Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 27.
Published in final edited form as: Cortex. 2023 Jun 9;166:188–206. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.04.017

Table 1 –

Demographics and pain calibration data for HC and VMPFC groups.

HC(n = 20) VMPFC(n = 5) HC versus VMPFC





Mean ±SD Mean ±SD ChiSq/U P-value

Sex* 10 M/10 F 3 M/2 F 0 1
Race* 19C/1H/0 AA 4C/0H/1 AA .03 .854
Age 63.5 4.62 60 5.15 67 .259
Education 17.95 3.27 15.6 3.58 66.5 .267
WRATa 112.05 5.84 105.2 11.18 67 .174
Low Temperature 41.65 3.87 44 2.37 30 .184
Medium Temperature 44.92 2.8 46.3 1.99 35 .322
High Temperature 47.83 1.49 48.4 .89 38.5 .432
Calibration r2 0.6 0.2 .61 0.1 59 .564
Temp*Intensity (Pearson) .76 .16 .78 .07 59 .564
Temp*Unpleasantness (Pearson) 0.7 0.2 .75 .06 57 .659
Intensity*Unpleasantness (Pearson) .86 .19 .92 .04 42 .61

Abbreviations: C=Caucasian; H=Hispanic; AA = African American; M = male; F = female; WRAT=Wide Range Achievement Test.

Low, Medium, and High Temperatures from calibration are in °C. Pearson values represent the mean of within-subject correlations for the listed values for each group. Chi–Square tests were used to compare categorical variables (*) and Mann–Whitney U-tests used to compare continuous variables between groups. There were no significant group differences in any variable.

a

Calculated from the WRAT3 verbal subscore.