Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 1;30(9):8092–8110. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090587

Table 5.

Randomized trials evaluating hypofractionated and dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Study Year Patient’s Number PCa Characteristics Dose (Gy) ADT bRFS (Phoenix) Toxicity
Marilia Medical School 2016 109 vs. 106 low (43.7%), intermediate (21.9%) and high (34.4%) 70 (IMRT) vs. 70 (3DCRT) 6 months in intermediate- and 2 years in high-risk 5-year 95.4% vs. 94.3% 6-month grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity 1% vs. 9% 6-month grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity 3% vs. 4%
HYPRO trial 2016 407 vs. 397 intermediate (26.2%) and high (73.8%) 64.6 in 19 f (VMAT) vs. 78.0 in 39 f each institutional protocol 5-year 80.5% vs. 77.1%
CHHiP trial 2016 1074 and 1077 vs. 1065 low (15.0%), intermediate (73.0%), and high (12.0%) risk 60 in 20 f or 57 in 19 f vs. 74 in 37 f 3–6 months 5-year 90.6%, 85.9% vs. 88.3% 2-year grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity 3%, 2% vs. 4% 2-year grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity 2%, 1% vs. 1%
MD Anderson study 2018 103 vs. 103 low (25.7%), intermediate (66.2%), and high (0.9%) risk 72 in 30 f vs. 75.6 in 42 f for patients with PSA levels > 10 ng/mL or cT3 disease 8-year 89.3% vs. 84.6% 8-year grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity 12.6% vs. 5.0% 8-year grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity 15.1% vs. 16.4%
NCT00062309 2020 151 vs. 152 low (9.2%), intermediate (62.4%) and high (28.4%) 70.2 in 26 f vs. 76 in 38 f 4 months in intermediate- and 2 years in high-risk 10-year 74.6% vs. 78.9%

PCa, prostate cancer; Gy, gray; ADT, androgen deprivation therapy; bRFS, biochemical relapse-free survival; IMRT, intensity modulated radiation therapy; 3DCRT, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy; f, fraction; VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy; GU, genitourinary; GI, gastrointestinal; PSA, prostate specific antigen; T, tumor.