Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 19.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Neurosci. 2023 Jul 3;14(14):2569–2581. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00268

Table 4.

Significantly changing prohormone-derived hypothalamus peptides identified from the Dec.-Jan. (IBA) vs. Dec.-Feb. (Torpor) comparison.

Peptide Sequencea Peptide Nameb Gene FC(log2)c
Q(−17.03)EDAELQPR CARTPT 1.57
FLGEAYHHVPESQRD CHGB 1.25
LGVLFNPYYDPLQWKSSRFE CHGB 0.94
Q(−17.03)YDRVAELDQLLHY BAM-1745 CHGB 1.03
YGGFLRKYP β-neoendorphin PDYN 1.24
MDELYPVEPEEEANGGEVL PENK 1.72
MDELYPVEPEEEANGGEVLA PENK 2.19
SPQLEDEAKEL PENK 1.34
VGRPEWWMDYQ PENK 1.60
YGGFMRF Met-enkephalin-Arg-Phe PENK 1.23
YGGFMRGL Met-enkephalin-Arg-Gly-Leu PENK 1.05
ALNSVAYERNAMQNY C-terminal flanking peptide(1-15) TAC1 1.21
ALNSVAYERNAMQNYE C-terminal flanking peptide TAC1 1.53
ASWTREPLE TRH 1.18
a

Post-translational modifications are indicated by mass change observed by mass spectrometry. Pyroglutamylation = (−17.03).

b

Peptide common names inferred from analogy to well-annotated rat sequence.

c

Fold-change values are given for IBA/Torpor comparison. A positive value indicates the peptide is higher abundance in IBA.