Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Injury. 2023 Jun 4;54(9):110859. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110859

Table 2.

Frequencies of Re-triage Status by Trauma Funding Status


Trauma Funding Statusa

Without Trauma Funding
(N=99071)
With Trauma Funding
(N=142685)
p-value

Re-Triage Status
Field Triage 94010 (94.9%) 129570 (90.8%) <0.0001 f
Appropriate Triageb 54694 (58.2%) 57698 (44.5%)
Under-Triagec 39316 (41.8%) 71872 (55.5%)
Re-Triage 1806 (1.8%) 5301 (3.7%) <0.0001 f
Optimald 1666 (92.3%) 4055 (76.5%)
Sub-optimale 140 (7.8%) 1246 (23.5%)
Other 3255 (3.3%) 7814 (5.5%)
a.

Trauma Funding Status was determined by the absence ($0.00) or presence (>$0.00) of per capita state trauma funding in the state that the patient was hospitalized in.

b.

Patients presenting to an emergency department at or directly admitted to a Level I or II trauma center, with no subsequent transfer, were defined as Appropriate Triage on the field.

c.

Patients presenting to an emergency department at or directly admitted to a Level III, IV, or non-trauma center, with no subsequent transfer, were defined as Under-Triage on the field.

d.

Patients emergently transferred from any emergency department to a Level I or II trauma center were defined as Optimal Re-Triage.

e.

Patients emergently transferred from any emergency department to a Level III, IV, or non-trauma center were defined as Sub-optimal Re-Triage.

f.

P-value obtained using a Pearson’s chi-square test.