Table 3.
Trauma Funding Statusa |
|||
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Without Trauma Funding (N=99071) |
With Trauma Funding (N=142685) |
p-value | |
| |||
All Patients | 3293 (3.3%) | 4820 (3.4%) | 0.4806f |
Re-triage Status | <0.0001f | ||
Field Triage | |||
Appropriate Triageb | 2540 (4.6%) | 2995 (5.2%) | |
Under-Triagec | 595 (1.5%) | 1195 (1.7%) | |
Re-Triage | |||
Optimald | 105 (6.3%) | 189 (4.7%) | |
Sub-optimale | 13 (9.3%) | 60 (4.8%) | |
Other | 40 (1.2%) | 381 (4.9%) | |
Homogeneity of ORs Across Trauma Funding Status Groups | 0.0009g |
Trauma Funding Status was determined by the absence ($0.00) or presence (>$0.00) of per capita state trauma funding in the state that the patient was hospitalized in.
Patients presenting to an emergency department at or directly admitted to a Level I or II trauma center, with no subsequent transfer, were defined as Appropriate Triage on the field.
Patients presenting to an emergency department at or directly admitted to a Level III, IV, or non-trauma center, with no subsequent transfer, were defined as Under-Triage on the field.
Patients emergently transferred from any emergency department to a Level I or II trauma center were defined as Optimal Re-Triage.
Patients emergently transferred from any emergency department to a Level III, IV, or non-trauma center were defined as Sub-optimal Re-Triage.
P-value testing the association between total mortality and trauma funding status obtained using a Pearson’s chi-square test.
P-value testing for the homogeneity of odds ratios between funding status groups via a test of a three-way interaction between trauma funding status, re-triage status, and mortality. The Other group was excluded when performing this test.