Abstract
The major outer membrane proteins (OMPs) of the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) agent, with molecular sizes of 44 to 47 kDa, are immunodominant antigens in human infection. Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to the OMPs were made by immunizing BALB/c mice with the purified HGE agent and then by fusing spleen cells with myeloma cells. The immunologic specificities of three MAbs (3E65, 5C11, and 5D13) were examined with five human HGE agent isolates and one tick isolate. By Western blot analysis, all three MAbs recognized the HGE agent but not Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia sennetsu, Ehrlichia canis, or their host cells. MAb 3E65 reacted with a 44-kDa protein in the homologous human isolate but not in the remaining five isolates. The two remaining MAbs recognized proteins with molecular sizes of 44 to 47 kDa in all six isolates. Western blot results with the OMP fraction of the six isolates were consistent with results with the whole HGE agent. Immunofluorescent-antibody staining and immunogold labeling with these MAbs showed that these antigens were primarily present on the membrane of the HGE agent. MAbs 5C11 and 5D13 recognized the recombinant 44-kDa protein by Western immunoblot analysis, but MAb 3E65 did not. Passive immunization with MAb 3E65 was more effective in protecting mice from HGE agent infection than with MAbs 5C11 and 5D13. These MAbs would be useful for analyzing the role of the major OMP antigens in HGE agent infection and for serodiagnosis.
Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) is an emerging tick-borne zoonosis characterized by fever, headache, myalgia, elevated liver enzyme (serum aminotransferase) levels, leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated C-reactive protein levels (2). The first 12 reported cases were in Wisconsin and Minnesota between 1990 and 1993. Subsequently, more than 400 cases have been identified in the upper Midwest and in the northeastern United States (1, 2, 4, 13, 15), and evidence of HGE has been also reported in Europe (3, 6, 10). The etiologic agent, currently referred to as the HGE agent, is an obligate intracellular gram-negative bacterium that replicates in the membrane-bound vacuoles of granulocytes. It is closely related to the Ehrlichia equi-E. phagocytophila group of the tribe Ehrlichieae (4). The pathogen is transmitted mainly by the deer tick, Ixodes scapularis, which is also the vector of Borrelia burgdorferi, the agent of Lyme disease (9, 13). Human coinfection with the HGE agent and B. burgdorferi has been previously reported (8).
Diagnosis is often made by a retrospective immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) test with the HGE agent or E. equi antigen (1–4, 6, 8, 11, 13, 14–17). Recently, we cloned and expressed a 44-kDa major antigen of the HGE agent and demonstrated that this recombinant antigen (rP44) may be more specific for serodiagnosis of HGE than whole organism-infected cells due to the absence of heat shock proteins or other antigenically cross-reactive proteins (17). PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene fragment of the HGE agent from peripheral blood has been gaining acceptance as a sensitive test at acute stages of HGE. Microscopic examination of Romanowsky-stained peripheral blood smears may reveal the presence of ehrlichial morulae in the neutrophils. Using five isolates of HGE agents and a tick isolate, we reported that the major outer membrane proteins (OMPs) of the HGE agent, with molecular sizes between 43 and 49 kDa, are immunodominant antigens in human infection (16, 17). Western blot analysis also revealed variations in numbers and molecular sizes of the major antigenic OMPs of the six isolates. Since polyclonal antisera were used for that study, it was unclear whether the major OMPs of similar sizes are common antigens among the six isolates. Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against a 44-kDa OMP of the HGE agent might be useful for clarifying the relationships of the OMPs of the HGE agent, for analyzing the antigenic epitopes, for understanding the immune responses of HGE agent infection, and for serodiagnosis. In this study, MAbs against a 44-kDa protein of HGE agent isolate 13 were produced and characterized by using five HGE agent isolates, a tick isolate, and rP44.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cultures and media.
Five isolates of the HGE agent (isolates 13, 2, 11, 3, and 6) (11, 16) and a tick isolate (USG) (5) were propagated in the human promyelocytic leukemia cell line HL-60 (American Type Culture Collection [ATCC], Manassas, Va.) in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Atlanta Biologicals, Norcross, Ga.), 1% minimal essential medium (MEM) nonessential amino acid mixture (GIBCO, Grand Island, N.Y.), 1 mM MEM sodium pyruvate (GIBCO), and 2 mM l-glutamine (GIBCO) (11, 16). Ehrlichia chaffeensis in THP-1 cells (ATCC) and Ehrlichia sennetsu in P388D1 cells (ATCC) were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 2 mM l-glutamine, while Ehrlichia canis in DH82 cells (12) and myeloma cells (SP2/0-Ag14; ATCC) were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (GIBCO) supplemented with 10% FBS and 2 mM l-glutamine. All cultures were incubated at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2–95% air atmosphere. Infectivities of all Ehrlichia spp. were determined by Diff-Quik (modified Giemsa; Baxter Scientific Products, Obetz, Ohio) staining, as described previously (11, 12).
Preparation of purified ehrlichiae and the outer membrane fraction.
Infected cells were weakly sonicated under predetermined conditions (16) to lyse infected cells with minimum damage to ehrlichiae. After centrifugation to remove unbroken cells and nuclei of the host cells, the supernatants containing freed ehrlichiae were size fractionated by Sephacryl S-1000 (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) chromatography, as previously described (12, 16). For sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), 25 μg of protein from each purified organism was aliquoted into 5 μl of 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (4 mM NaH2PO4 and 6 mM Na2HPO4, pH 7.4) containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) and frozen at −85°C. The outer membrane fractions of the six isolates were prepared by a modified Sarkosyl differential solubilization method (16). The outer membrane fraction was washed once with 50 μl of 0.2% Sarkosyl in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 1 h. The final pellets were resuspended in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer containing 1 mM PMSF and frozen at −85°C.
Immunization.
Eight 6-week-old male BALB/c mice (Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, Ind.) were injected intraperitoneally with a 0.2-ml mixture of equal volumes of purified HGE agent 13 (200 μg/mouse) in PBS (2.7 mM KCl, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, 137 mM NaCl, and 10 mM Na2HPO4 [pH 7.4]) and Freund’s complete adjuvant (Sigma). Two weeks after the first immunization, each mouse was boosted subcutaneously with the 0.2-ml mixture of equal volumes of 100 μg of the purified HGE agent in PBS and Freund’s incomplete adjuvant (Sigma). The mice were intraperitoneally injected with purified HGE agent in PBS (100 μg/mouse) without adjuvant on the 7th day after the second immunization. Between 35 and 40 days after the first immunization, 0.5 ml of blood was collected from the retroorbital venous plexus of immunized mice. Serum was collected and antibody titers were determined by an IFA test using antigen slides of HGE agent 13 prepared as previously described (11, 16). Four days before sacrifice, the purified HGE agent (100 μg/mouse in 0.1 ml of PBS) was intravenously injected.
Hybridoma production.
When antibody titers were greater than 1:2,560, mice were sacrificed and spleen cells were fused with myeloma cells in either 50% polyethylene glycol 4000 (GIBCO) or 40% polyethylene glycol 4000 containing 7.6% dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma) in PBS, according to the procedure described by Goding (7). Two milliliters of the fusion mixture (105 myeloma cells and 3 × 105 to 4 × 105 spleen cells) in complete DMEM (cDMEM) (DMEM containing 20% FBS, 1 mM MEM sodium pyruvate, 1% MEM nonessential amino acid mixture, 2 mM l-glutamine, and a 1:100 dilution of antibiotic-antimycotic mixture [GIBCO] [penicillin G, 10,000 U/ml; streptomycin sulfate, 10,000 μg/ml; amphotericin B, 25 μg/ml]) containing HAT supplement (diluted 1:100 from the stock solution of 10 mM Na-hypoxanthine, 40 μM aminopterin, and 1.6 mM thymidine [GIBCO]) was aliquoted into each well of 24-well culture plates with spleen feeder cells. All cultures were incubated at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2–95% air atmosphere. When colonies became visible, the medium was gradually replaced with cDMEM containing 100 μM Na-hypoxanthine (GIBCO) and 16 μM thymidine (Sigma). For subcultures of positive clones, cDMEM was used.
Screening of candidate hybridoma clones.
To screen clones producing MAbs against the HGE agent, both the IFA test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were used. For the IFA test, 10 μl of undiluted supernatant was added to each well of HGE agent 13 slides prepared as previously described (11, 16) and incubated at 37°C for 90 min. After a wash with 2× PBS (19 mM K2HPO4, 12 mM KH2PO4, and 300 mM NaCl [pH 7.4]) containing 0.05% Tween 20 (Sigma), 10 μl of fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) + IgM (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, Pa.) at a 1:100 dilution was added and incubated at 37°C for 90 min. All slides were counterstained with 0.1% Evans blue in 2× PBS and examined with a Nikon (Garden City, N.Y.) Microphot-FX epifluorescence microscope. For photography of labeled cells, infected cells were cytocentrifuged and fixed with Diff-Quik fixative containing methanol and incubated with antibodies as described above.
For ELISA, 96-well plates were coated with purified HGE agent 13 at 1 μg of protein/well in 50 mM Na-bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) and blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in the same buffer. One hundred microliters of undiluted hybridoma supernatant was added to each well, including 100 μl each of both the positive (polyclonal mouse anti-HGE agent 13) and negative (normal BALB/c mouse serum) controls at 1:10 dilutions in PBS containing 5% nonfat dry milk. All plates were incubated at 37°C for 1 h and rinsed three times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20. Peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulins (IgG + IgA + IgM) (ICN Pharmaceuticals, Aurora, Ohio) at a 1:500 dilution in PBS containing 5% nonfat dry milk were added and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. ABTS [0.15% 2,2′-azino-di-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonate)] (Sigma) in 0.1 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 4.2) and 0.03% H2O2 were added and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The supernatants which had absorbances at 405 nm of greater than 0.8 were again confirmed by the IFA test. The cutoff value of 0.8 was chosen because negative control wells had absorbances of less than 0.5 and 100% of wells with absorbances of above 1.0 were IFA positive; we chose 0.8 to cover some weakly positive clones. Finally, all hybridomas identified as positive clones by both tests were subcultured into six-well culture plates. When cells were confluent, these clones were frozen in 90% FBS and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide at −85°C. The wells identified as positive clones by primary screening were subcloned three times via a limiting dilution technique (7).
Production of ascitic fluids containing MAbs.
For rapid production of ascitic fluids containing MAbs, 3 to 5 days prior to hybridoma injection, 0.5 ml of the inflammatory agent pristane (Sigma) was intraperitoneally injected into 6-week-old male BALB/c mice (10 mice per clone). At 12 days after intraperitoneal injection of actively growing hybridomas (3E65, 5C11, and 5D13) into the mice (2 × 106 to 3 × 106 cells/mouse in 0.2 ml of sterile PBS), ascitic fluids containing MAbs were harvested and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min. After the ascitic fluid for each clone was pooled and inactivated by incubation at 56°C for 30 min, antibody titers were determined by the IFA test with an antigen slide of HGE agent 13. Ascitic fluid containing MAbs was diluted at 1:10, filtered through a 0.45-μm-pore-size filter, and frozen at −20 or −85°C.
Isotyping of MAbs.
Using either ascitic fluids or culture supernatants, isotypes of MAbs were determined by the Mouse Monoclonal Typing Kit (The Binding Site, Birmingham, United Kingdom), which is based on the Ouchterlony immunodiffusion technique, and by the Mouse MAb ID/SP Kit (Zymed Laboratories, Inc., South San Francisco, Calif.), which is based on a streptavidin-biotin amplification system in an HGE agent antigen-dependent ELISA.
SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis.
Twenty-five micrograms of proteins of purified isolates (isolates 13, 2, 11, 3, 6, and USG) and the OMP fraction of each isolate; purified E. chaffeensis, E. sennetsu, and E. canis; uninfected host cells (HL-60, THP-1, and DH82); and 10 μg of rP44, affinity purified as described elsewhere (17), were dissolved in sample buffer (5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, 2% SDS, and 0.08% bromophenol blue in 62.5 mM Tris buffer [pH 6.8]). To examine whether the antigenic epitope is trypsin sensitive, 100 μg of purified HGE agent was incubated in 0.5 ml of 0.25% trypsin (Sigma) in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. Samples, including 10 μl of diluted (1:20) broad-range molecular weight standards (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.), were boiled at 100°C for 5 min. SDS-PAGE and Western blotting were performed as described elsewhere (12, 16). Protein blots were immersed in blocking buffer (5% nonfat dry milk in 2× PBS) at 4°C overnight and incubated with culture supernatants (at a 1:10 dilution in blocking buffer) or ascitic fluids (at a 1:50 dilution) of hybridoma clones 3E65, 5C11, or 5D13 at room temperature for 2 h. After three rinses with TNTT buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.02% Tween 20, and 0.01% thimerosal [Sigma] [pH 7.4]), the blots were incubated at room temperature for 2 h with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulins (IgG + IgA + IgM) (ICN Pharmaceuticals) at a 1:2,000 dilution in blocking buffer. The blots were washed three times with TNTT buffer for 5 min each. The peroxidase-positive bands were detected by immersing the blots in a developing solution (73 mM sodium acetate, pH 6.2) containing 0.3% diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Kyoto, Japan) and 0.04% H2O2 at room temperature for 5 min. The enzyme reaction was terminated by washing the blots in 0.1 M H2SO4.
Immunogold labeling.
HGE agent 13-infected cells (2 × 107) were fixed in a fixative (2.5% paraformaldehyde, 0.5% glutaraldehyde, 0.03% trinitrophenol, and 0.03% CaCl2 in 0.05 M cacodylate buffer [pH 7.4]) at room temperature for 1 h and en bloc stained with 1% uranyl acetate in 0.1 M maleate buffer (pH 5.2) at room temperature for 1 h. The specimen was dehydrated in a series of graded ethanols (50 to 90%) and embedded in LR gold (Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, Pa.) which had been polymerized at −25°C in a low-temperature UV curing unit (Polysciences). Ultrathin sections (800 Å) were cut with a diamond knife and mounted on 300-mesh nickel grids. The grids were incubated for 1 h with each MAb in ascitic fluid or positive and negative control sera diluted 1:50 with PBS-GT (0.1% gelatin and 0.01% Tween 20 in PBS, pH 7.4). The grids were rinsed in PBS-GT and incubated at room temperature for 1 h with goat anti-mouse IgG + IgM conjugated with 10-nm gold particles (Amersham, Arlington Heights, Ill.) diluted 1:20 with PBS-GT. The grids were gently rinsed in PBS-GT and distilled water. The sections were stained with 2% uranyl acetate in water and observed with a Philips 300 transmission electron microscope at 60 kV.
Mouse protection assay.
Five groups of three mice each (C3H/HeN, 4-week-old females; Harlan Sprague-Dawley) were inoculated intraperitoneally with HGE agent 13-infected HL-60 cells (greater than 90% infected cells, 106 cells/mouse) which had been preincubated at 37°C for 30 min with 0.3 ml of each MAb in ascitic fluid or positive or negative control mouse sera. MAbs and the positive control serum were diluted in PBS so that the final IFA titer against HGE agent 13 was 1:2,000. One day after infection, mice were injected intraperitoneally with 0.3 ml of each MAb or control sera. At 5 days post-HGE agent inoculation, mice were sacrificed for collection of blood specimens. DNA was extracted from the blood with the QIAamp blood kit (Qiagen Inc., Chatsworth, Calif.). A pair of primers, 497-521 (5′-TAGGCGGTTCGGTAAGTTAAAG-3′) and 747-727 (5′-GCACTCATCGTTTACAGCGTG-3′) (13), was used for amplification in a thermal cycler (model 480; Perkin-Elmer) with 5 min of denaturation at 94°C, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C, annealing at 57°C, and extension at 72°C for 1 min each. After the last cycle, extension was continued for 7 min at 72°C. Each 50-μl PCR mixture contained 1 μg of template DNA, 5 μl of 10× reaction buffer, 0.2 mM concentrations of deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1.25 U of Taq polymerase, and 16 pmol of each primer. PCR products (10 μl each) were electrophoresed in 1.5% agarose gels containing 0.5 μg of ethidium bromide at 95 V for 1 h and photographed under UV illumination with a gel video system (Gel Print 2000i; Biophotonics Corporation, Ann Arbor, Mich.).
RESULTS
Production of hybridomas and MAbs.
By both IFA test and ELISA, 16.7% of colonies (127 of 761) were positive at the first screening. Subsequently, 39 hybridomas with strong antibody production were subcloned three times and 20 hybridomas were identified as positive by Western blot analysis. Three clones (3E65, 5C11, and 5D13) which reacted to the approximately 44-kDa major antigen of HGE agent 13 were selected for this study. Ascitic fluid was produced with each MAb, and MAb isotypes were determined (Table 1). IFA titers of ascitic fluids and culture supernatants of the three MAbs used were 1:20,480 and 1:320, respectively. These three clones have been stable for more than 1 year.
TABLE 1.
Characteristics of MAbs against the HGE agent
MAba | Isotype | Protein(s) (kDa) recognized in HGE agent isolateb:
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13 | 2 | 11 | 3 | 6 | USG | ||
3E65 | IgG1 | 44, 110 | 110 | 110 | 110 | 110 | 110 |
5C11 | IgG2b | 44, 89 | 41, 46, 47 | 47 | 47 | 45 | 44, 45, 46 |
5D13 | IgG2b | 44 | 41, 46, 47 | 47 | 47 | 45 | 44, 45, 46 |
Subcloned three times by limiting dilution techniques.
Major antigens of the six HGE agent isolates are shown in boldface type.
Western immunoblotting.
All three MAbs recognized the HGE agent but not E. chaffeensis, E. canis, E. sennetsu, or their uninfected host cells (HL-60, THP-1, and DH82) (Fig. 1B). Although band intensities and molecular sizes were slightly variable among HGE isolates, the major antigens recognized by the three MAbs were around 44 kDa (Fig. 1B and Table 1).
FIG. 1.
Western immunoblot analysis of HGE agent 13, E. chaffeensis, E. canis, E. sennetsu, and their uninfected host cells with three MAbs. (A) Proteins were separated on a 10% polyacrylamide gel and stained with Coomassie blue. (B) For Western blot analysis, hybridoma (3E65, 5C11, and 5D13) culture supernatants were used at 1:10 dilutions. Molecular weight (MW) standards were from Bio-Rad.
In our previous study, with polyclonal antibodies, multiple bands of approximately 44 kDa were seen in whole HGE agent antigen, but fewer bands were seen in the OMP fraction (16). Since we had used 1 mM PMSF for preparation of the OMP fraction of HGE agents but not for purification of whole HGE agent organisms, we examined the effect of 1 mM PMSF on the molecular size of proteins recognized with MAb 5C11 by Western blot analysis. We found that in the presence of PMSF, the density of the 47-kDa band was reduced and that of the 44-kDa band became thicker, suggesting that a 47-kDa protein is the precursor of the 44-kDa protein and that a protease which cleaves the 47-kDa protein to a 44-kDa protein might be degraded in the absence of PMSF (Fig. 2). Therefore, 1 mM PMSF was added to all specimens throughout this study. No difference was detected if PMSF was added at the beginning or just after purification of the HGE agent, suggesting that this change primarily occurs after purification of the HGE agent.
FIG. 2.
Effect of PMSF on the molecular size of major antigens recognized by MAb 5C11. Uninfected HL-60 cells, purified HGE agent 13, 1 mM PMSF-treated HGE agent, and the OMP fraction of the HGE agent were separated on a 10% polyacrylamide gel, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and incubated with a 1:50 dilution of MAb 5C11 in ascitic fluid. Molecular weight (MW) standards were from Bio-Rad.
Trypsin treatment of HGE agent 13 completely destroyed the reactivity of all three MAbs, indicating that these MAbs recognize trypsin-sensitive epitopes (data not shown).
When the six isolates (13, 2, 11, 3, 6, and USG) were compared, MAb 3E65 reacted strongly with a 44-kDa protein in HGE agent 13 but not in the remaining five isolates. It also reacted weakly with a 110-kDa protein in all isolates (Fig. 3B). These two proteins appear to have a common epitope in HGE agent 13, since it is unlikely that, after subcloning three times by the limiting dilution technique, two hybridomas would be cocloned in MAb 3E65. Although MAbs 5C11 and 5D13 were derived from different master plates prepared from the same mouse spleen, they reacted in almost identical manners by Western blot analysis. Both recognized proteins that are approximately 44 kDa in all six isolates (Fig. 3B). The molecular sizes and numbers of the major antigens recognized by MAbs 5C11 and 5D13 varied slightly, from 44 to 47 kDa, among the six isolates (Fig. 3B and Table 1). MAbs 5C11 and 5D13 recognized antigens of the same molecular sizes both in whole organisms and in the OMP fractions of the six isolates (Fig. 4B). Thus, all of these antigenic proteins common within each isolate and among the six isolates appear to be present in the outer membrane.
FIG. 3.
Comparisons of six purified HGE agent isolates with three MAbs on a 10% polyacrylamide gel (A) and by Western blot analysis (B). (A) Proteins from purified HGE agent isolates (13, 2, 11, 3, 6, and USG) were separated on a 10% polyacrylamide gel and stained with Coomassie blue. (B) For Western blot analysis, hybridoma (3E65, 5C11, and 5D13) culture supernatants were used at 1:10 dilutions. Molecular weight (MW) standards were from Bio-Rad.
FIG. 4.
Western blot analysis of the OMP fractions from six HGE agent isolates with three MAbs. (A) The OMP fractions from the six HGE agent isolates (13, 2, 11, 3, 6, and USG) were separated on a 10% polyacrylamide gel and stained with Coomassie blue. (B) For Western blot analysis, hybridoma (3E65, 5C11, and 5D13) culture supernatants were used at 1:10 dilutions. Molecular weight (MW) standards were from Bio-Rad.
MAb 3E65 did not recognize the rP44 antigen, while MAbs 5C11 and 5D13 did (Fig. 5). These results show that the epitope of the 44-kDa protein recognized by MAb 3E65 is different from those recognized by MAbs 5C11 and 5D13.
FIG. 5.
Western blot analysis of rP44 with three MAbs. (A) Purified HGE agent 13 and affinity-purified rP44 were separated on a 10% polyacrylamide gel and stained with Coomassie blue. (B) For Western blot analysis, hybridoma (3E65, 5C11, and 5D13) culture supernatants were used at 1:10 dilutions. Molecular weight (MW) standards were from Bio-Rad.
Immunofluorescence and immunogold labeling.
Polyclonal anti-HGE agent mouse serum strongly labeled entire HGE agent 13 organisms, while the negative control mouse serum did not label any structure at all in the IFA test. All three MAbs labeled both intracellular and extracellular HGE agents bound to HL-60 cells in a ring-like pattern (Fig. 6). Immunogold labeling results show that a 44-kDa OMP antigen is concentrated on the membrane of the HGE agent; with polyclonal antiserum and MAb 3E65, some labeling appeared to be present on inclusion membranes, too (Fig. 7).
FIG. 6.
IFA staining of HGE agent 13 in HL-60 cells with three MAbs. Infected HL-60 cells were fixed in Diff-Quik fixative and incubated with MAbs (3E65, 5C11, and 5D13) in ascitic fluid at 1:100 dilutions and with positive and negative control (NS) mouse sera at 1:50 dilutions. Note the ring-like labeling of the HGE agent with all three MAbs. Magnification, ×1,600.
FIG. 7.
Transmission electron micrograph of HGE agent 13 in HL-60 cells immunogold labeled with MAbs. Infected cells were embedded in LR Gold, and ultrathin sections on grids were incubated with MAbs (3E65 and 5C11) and positive and negative control mouse sera and with goat anti-mouse IgG + IgM conjugated with 10-nm gold particles (Amersham). Bars, 0.4 μm.
Mouse protection test.
Passive immunization with polyclonal mouse anti-HGE agent serum and MAb 3E65 consistently showed superior protection, with 67% (2 of 3 mice) protected from HGE agent 13 infection; with MAbs 5C11 and 5D13, 33% (1 of 3 mice) were protected (Fig. 8). Although the mice did not show any clinical signs during the 5-day infection period, all negative control mice were positive for HGE agent DNA by PCR, indicating subclinical infection. The detection limit of PCR was 0.15 pg of DNA in blood.
FIG. 8.
PCR detection of the HGE agent 16S rRNA gene in the blood of HGE agent-inoculated mice passively immunized with MAbs. Three mice each were inoculated with HGE agent 13-infected HL-60 cells and each MAb or positive or negative control mouse serum. Each group of mice was inoculated again on the 2nd day with the same antibody. DNAs were prepared from the blood of all mice at 5 days post-HGE agent inoculation. One microgram of DNA was used as the template for PCR. As a positive control, 10 pg of DNA extracted from purified HGE agent 13 was used, while distilled water without template was used as a negative control. The arrow shows the HGE agent-specific 16S rRNA gene fragment (287 bp) obtained by PCR amplification. N1 to N3, negative control mouse serum-treated mice; P1 to P3, positive control (polyclonal anti-HGE agent) mouse serum-treated mice; E1 to E3, MAb 3E65-treated mice; C1 to C3, MAb 5C11-treated mice; D1 to D3: MAb 5D13-treated mice. Numbers on the left indicate molecular sizes of φX174 RF DNA/HaeIII fragments (GIBCO). The experiment was repeated twice.
DISCUSSION
Our previous study showed that multiple bands between 43 and 49 kDa of HGE agents are recognized in both whole cells and OMP fractions by polyclonal antisera against the six strains of the HGE agent. We also found that although these antigenic epitopes were cross-reactive with antisera to other isolates, the HGE agent has a strain polymorphism in its major antigenic proteins (16). The present study, using MAbs against OMPs of the HGE agent, suggests two major reasons for the presence of these multiple major antigenic proteins. One is the degradation of a protease which probably cleaves a 47-kDa protein to a 44-kDa protein during HGE agent storage or during SDS-PAGE. One possibility is that this 3-kDa molecular size difference is due to the cleavage of an N-terminal signal peptide, termed a leader sequence. Our DNA sequence data of the 44-kDa major antigen gene shows an amino acid sequence (VRA) recognizable by signal peptidases, and the chemically determined N-terminal amino acid sequence showed that this site is actually cleaved in a native mature 44-kDa protein (17). The bacterial signal peptidase is not inhibited by PMSF (14, 18). Since PMSF treatment of the HGE agent prevented a degradation-induced artifact of multiple bands of major antigens, we recommend the use of PMSF for HGE agent SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis. Although there is no N-glycosylation site based on the predicted amino acid sequence from the 44-kDa protein gene (17), whether this protein is O glycosylated or whether any glycosylation may contribute to multiple bands is unknown. The second and more significant reason for the presence of multiple bands may be the presence of multiple cross-reactive major antigenic proteins of different molecular sizes, since even in the presence of PMSF these multiple bands were seen in some isolates. This reason is supported by our recent study which revealed the presence of multiple homologous gene copies of the major 44-kDa OMPs in the HGE agent genome (17).
Our rP44 antigen approximately corresponds to the N-terminal half of the 44-kDa protein and was commonly recognized by all HGE patient sera tested and by anti-E. equi serum (17). Therefore, MAbs 5C11 and 5D13 appear to recognize an antigenic epitope present at the N-terminal half of the 44-kDa protein. Since MAb 3E65 did not recognize rP44, it may be reacting to the C-terminal half of the 44-kDa protein. If this is the case, the C-terminal half of the 44-kDa protein of HGE agent 13 may contain an antigenic epitope in common with the 110-kDa protein, but homologous 44-kDa proteins of the remaining isolates may lack this epitope. MAbs 5C11 and 5D13 appear to behave in almost identical manners. An additional study is required to determine whether the two MAbs recognize the same epitope.
The three MAbs protected mice from HGE agent 13 infection, suggesting that the 44-kDa protein has a significant role in establishing HGE agent infection in mice. MAb 3E65 is as effective as polyclonal antiserum in protecting mice from HGE agent infection and is more effective than MAbs 5C11 or 5D13, suggesting that the epitope recognized by MAb 3E65 may be more accessible to the antibody or may have a more critical role in HGE agent infection than those recognized by the other two MAbs. These MAbs may serve as useful reagents in analyzing the interaction of the HGE agent with host cells and may also be useful for purifying major OMPs and in HGE serodiagnosis.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by grant AI40934 from the National Institutes of Health.
We thank Evelyn Handley, of the EM laboratory of Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, for technical assistance. Our colleagues Norio Ohashi and Ning Zhi are appreciated for helpful advice in purifying rP44. We also thank Lawrence Dearth and Raymond Mankoski for editorial assistance.
REFERENCES
- 1.Aguero-Rosenfeld M E, Horowitz H W, Wormser G P, McKenna D F, Nowakowski J, Munoz J, Dumler J S. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis: a case series from a medical center in New York State. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:904–908. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-11-199612010-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bakken J S, Krueth J, Wilson-Nordskog C, Tilden R L, Asanovich K, Dumler J S. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. JAMA. 1996;275:199–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bakken J S, Krueth J, Tilden R L, Dumler J S, Kristansen R E. Serologic evidence of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Norway. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997;15:829–832. doi: 10.1007/BF01701530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen S M, Dumler J S, Bakken J S, Walker D H. Identification of a granulocytotrophic Ehrlichia species as the etiological agent of human disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:589–595. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.3.589-595.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Coughlin R T, Gingrich-Baker C, Mather T, Fish D. Abstracts of the 12th Sesquiannual Meeting of the American Society for Rickettsiology and Rickettsial Disease. Albany, N.Y: American Society for Rickettsiology and Rickettsial Disease; 1996. Transmission, isolation, and cultivation of granulocytic Ehrlichia resulting from infection of dogs by adult Ixodes scapularis collected from Eastern United States, abstr. 52. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dumler J S, Dotevall L, Gustafson R, Granstrom M. A population-based seroepidemiologic study of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis and Lyme borreliosis on the west coast of Sweden. J Infect Dis. 1997;175:720–722. doi: 10.1093/infdis/175.3.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Goding J W. Monoclonal antibodies: principles and practice. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 1996. pp. 116–191. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nadelman R B, Horowitz H W, Hsieh T C, Wu J W, Aguero-Rosenfeld M E, Schwartz I, Nowakowski J, Varde S, Wormser G P. Simultaneous human granulocytic ehrlichiosis and Lyme borreliosis. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:27–30. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199707033370105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pancholi P, Kolbert C P, Mitchell P D, Reed K D, Jr, Dumler J S, Bakken J S, Telford III S R, Persing D H. Ixodes dammini as a potential vector of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. J Infect Dis. 1995;172:1007–1012. doi: 10.1093/infdis/172.4.1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Petrovec M, Furlan S L, Zupanc T A, Strle F, Brouqui P, Roux V, Dumler J S. Human disease in Europe caused by a granulocytic Ehrlichia species. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:1556–1559. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.6.1556-1559.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rikihisa Y, Zhi N, Wormser G P, Wen B, Horowitz H W, Hechemy K E. Ultrastructural and antigenic characterization of a granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent directly isolated and stably cultivated from a patient in New York State. J Infect Dis. 1997;175:210–213. doi: 10.1093/infdis/175.1.210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rikihisa Y. Cross-reacting antigens between Neorickettsia helminthoeca and Ehrlichia spp. shown by immunofluorescence and Western immunoblotting. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:2024–2029. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.9.2024-2029.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Telford S R, III, Dawson J E, Katavolos P, Warner C K, Kolbert C P, Persing D H. Perpetuation of the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in a deer tick-rodent cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:6209–6214. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.6209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tschantz W R, Dalbey R E. Bacterial leader peptidase 1. Methods Enzymol. 1994;244:285–301. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(94)44023-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wormser G, McKenna D, Aguero-Rosenfeld M, et al. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis—New York. Morbid Mortal Weekly Rep. 1995;44:593–595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhi N, Rikihisa Y, Kim H Y, Wormser G P, Horowitz H W. Comparison of major antigenic proteins of six strains of the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent by Western immunoblot analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:2606–2611. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.10.2606-2611.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhi N, Ohashi N, Rikihisa Y, Horowitz H W, Wormser G P, Hechemy K. Cloning and expression of the 44-kilodalton major outer membrane protein gene of the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent and application of the recombinant protein to serodiagnosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:1666–1673. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.6.1666-1673.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zwizinski C, Date T, Wickner W. Leader peptidase is found in both the inner and outer membranes of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1981;256:3593–3597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]