Table 3.
The performance comparison of our model AMMVF-DTI with existing models on the C. elegans dataset. The best performance values are highlighted in bold.
| Model | AUC | Precision | Recall |
|---|---|---|---|
| KNN | 0.858 | 0.801 | 0.827 |
| RF | 0.902 | 0.821 | 0.844 |
| L2 | 0.892 | 0.890 | 0.877 |
| SVM | 0.894 | 0.785 | 0.818 |
| MDL-CPI | 0.975 | 0.943 | 0.923 |
| GNN | 0.978 | 0.938 | 0.929 |
| GCN | 0.975 ± 0.004 | 0.921 ± 0.008 | 0.927 ± 0.006 |
| GraphDTA | 0.974 ± 0.004 | 0.927 ± 0.015 | 0.912 ± 0.023 |
| TransformerCPI | 0.988 ± 0.002 | 0.952 ± 0.006 | 0.953 ± 0.005 |
| AMMVF-DTI (this work) | 0.990 | 0.962 | 0.960 |