Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 12;14(9):469. doi: 10.3390/jfb14090469

Table 3.

Differences in regression coefficients (b) for implant length and implant diameter between the block densities for SICace®, SICmax®, and SICtapered®. b illustrated the mean percentage change in insertion torque per 1 mm change in implant length or diameter. Significant differences in the regression coefficients (b) in PCF 10 are denoted by * (p < 0.05) or § (p < 0.1). The term ratio reflects the quotient of bdiameter/blength.

PCF 35 PCF 25 PCF 15 PCF 10
b (%) CI95 CI95 b (%) CI95 CI95 b (%) CI95 CI95 b (%) CI95 CI95
(Low) (High) (Low) (High) (Low) (High) (Low) (High)
SICace® Length 12.3 * 10.7 13.8 7.8 5.5 10.1 3.2 § 1.5 4.8 7.4 4.6 10.2
Diameter 40.3 * 25.5 56.9 143.3 § 122.3 166.3 81.7 § 69.5 94.7 109.2 80.8 142.1
Ratio 3.2 18.3 25.5 14.7
SICmax® Length 19.4 * 16.9 22 15.7 * 13.5 17.9 9.3 * 7.2 11.5 6.6 5.3 8
Diameter 40.8 * 10.5 79.2 86.0 66.7 107.6 103.1 81.5 127.3 83.2 70.2 97.1
Ratio 2.1 5.4 11.0 12.6
SICtapered® Length 16.4 * 14.4 18.4 15.0 * 12.6 17.6 7.5 * 5.8 9.2 4.9 3.9 5.8
Diameter 62.5 § 51.4 74.3 76.3 * 53.7 102.3 100.5 * 89.5 112.2 51.0 44.0 58.5
Ratio 3.8 5.0 13.4 10.4