Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 20;9(9):950. doi: 10.3390/jof9090950

Table 2.

An estimate of genetic variability and neutrality indices of Lasiodiplodia species. S: The number of segregating sites, h: The number of haplotypes, Hd: The haplotype diversity, π: Nucleotide diversity. RM: the minimum number of recombination events, ZnS: Kelly’s ZNs [62], ZZ: Rozas’ ZZ [65]. Statistical significance: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.

S h Hd π (×10−3) ZnS ZZ RM Fu and Li’s D * Tajima’s D
L. theobromae
ITS 2 3 0.12 0.24 0.00 0.00 0 0.72 −1.19
SSU 18 11 0.29 0.66 0.11 0.22 0 −4.76 * −2.51 **
EF1 31 12 0.70 3.99 0.17 0.13 2 −1.22 −2.08 *
TUB 6 6 0.24 0.70 0.07 0.13 0 −0.63 −1.84 *
Combined dataset 57 27 0.87 1.36 0.07 0.24 3 −2.66 * −2.41 **
L. brasiliensis
ITS 6 6 0.80 3.73 0.54 0.12 1 −0.44 −0.23
SSU 11 3 0.35 1.98 0.82 0.08 0 −2.43 * −2.01 *
EF1 6 2 0.18 1.85 1.00 0.00 0 −2.21 * −1.85 *
TUB 2 2 0.18 0.81 1.00 0.00 0 −1.66 −1.43
Combined dataset 25 7 0.87 2.11 0.32 ** 0.38 1 −2.12 * −1.70
L. hormozganensis
ITS 6 6 0.86 3.46 0.13 −0.06 0 1.26 0.09
SSU 6 6 0.49 2.30 0.15 0.14 0 −3.03 * −2.15 **
EF1 2 2 0.11 0.38 1.00 0.00 0 −1.99 −1.51
TUB 6 5 0.66 3.06 0.17 0.15 0 −0.10 −0.70
Combined dataset 22 13 0.95 1.68 0.10 0.14 1 −1.23 −1.30
L. pseudotheobromae
ITS 2 2 0.15 0.60 ND ND 0 −1.78 −1.47
SSU 15 7 0.73 3.12 0.31 0.05 0 −1.37 −1.45
EF1 15 7 0.73 3.12 0.31 0.05 0 −1.37 −1.45
TUB 3 2 0.15 1.03 1.00 0.00 0 −2.02 −1.65
Combined dataset 26 10 0.95 2.04 0.19 0.21 1 −1.91 −1.65
L. rubropurpurea
ITS 1 2 0.14 0.28 ND ND 0 0.61 −0.73
SSU 13 6 0.40 1.21 0.48 0.22 1 −3.20 * −2.16 *
EF1 44 8 0.84 13.90 0.61 0.18 1 1.49 * −1.12
TUB 2 3 0.15 0.33 0.00 ** 0.00 0 −2.22 −1.51
Combined dataset 60 16 0.90 6.11 0.36 0.35 4 0.16 −1.48
L. iranensis
ITS 1
SSU 13 6 0.40 1.21 0.48 0.22 1 −3.20 * −2.16 *
EF1 18 5 0.67 9.59 0.37 −0.04 0 −0.99 −0.61
TUB 8 9 0.91 6.58 0.22 −0.05 1 0.02 0.17
Combined dataset 37 13 0.99 3.72 0.18 0.20 2 −1.29 −0.90