Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 5;13(9):1872. doi: 10.3390/life13091872

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study cohort.

Characteristic Patients, n = 209 (%)
Age, mean ± SD, years 58 ± 11.3
Age at diagnosis, mean ± SD, years 47 ± 12.1
Age at treatment, mean ± SD, years 54 ± 10.9
Sex (male) 117 (56)
Ethnicity
Jewish 201 (96.2)
Bedouin 8 (3.8)
Subgrouping
Israeli-born 74 (35.4)
Immigrant—former Soviet Union 135 (64.6)
Genotype
1a 34 (16.3)
1b 121 (57.9)
2a 9 (4.3)
3 38 (18.2)
4a 4 (1.9)
Patient type
Treatment-naïve 149 (71.3)
Experienced past treatment 58 (27.8)
Viral load (IU/mL)
≤800,000 76 (36.4)
>800,000 133 (63.6)
Method of fibrosis assessment at treatment time
Fibrotest 165 (78.9)
Fibroscan 21 (10)
Fibrosis stage at treatment time
F0–F1 53 (25.4)
F2 56 (26.8)
F3 38 (18.2)
F4 62 (29.7)
Updated fibrosis stage
F0–F1 146 (69.9)
F2 22 (10.5)
F3 16 (7.7)
F4 25 (12)
Change in fibrosis score
No change in the fibrosis score 75 (35.9)
Regression of fibrosis
3 stages 18 (8.6)
2 stages 38 (18.2)
1 stage 63 (30.1)
Progression of fibrosis
1 stage 12 (5.7)
2 stages 3 (1.4)
Regression in the fibrosis score
From F3/F4 to F2 or less 58 (27.8)
Treatment type
Dasabuvir/ombitasvir or paritaprevir/ritonavir 19 (9.1)
Dasabuvir/ombitasvir or paritaprevir/ritonavir/ribavirin 13 (6.2)
Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir 28 (13.4)
Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir/ribavirin 4 (1.9)
Elbasvir/grazoprevir 39 (18.7)
Daclatasvir/sofosbuvir 4 (1.9)
Daclatasvir/sofosbuvir/ribavirin 16 (2.9)
Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir 49 (23.4)
Pibrentasvir/glecaprevir 45 (21.5)
Sustained virologic response (SVR) 207 (99)