Table 2.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
1 | 1 | 27.90% | 19.10% | 19.40% | 20.20% | 20.00% | 20.00% | 20.90% | 19.00% |
2 | 78.58% | 1 | 71.37% | 18.00% | 19.50% | 19.70% | 66.17% | 66.26% | 66.35% |
3 | 72.14% | 20.80% | 1 | 20.40% | 18.40% | 17.90% | 66.60% | 66.53% | 66.71% |
4 | 71.17% | 72.82% | 71.41% | 1 | 70.36% | 70.29% | 65.96% | 65.82% | 65.90% |
5 | 71.16% | 71.02% | 71.68% | 17.90% | 1 | 56.90% | 67.60% | 67.60% | 67.61% |
6 | 70.92% | 71.04% | 71.51% | 19.30% | 94.27% | 1 | 67.78% | 67.74% | 67.92% |
7 | 66.21% | 22.80% | 20.60% | 21.80% | 22.00% | 21.40% | 1 | 27.60% | 27.70% |
8 | 66.06% | 22.30% | 23.50% | 21.80% | 21.80% | 22.40% | 84.02% | 1 | 67.40% |
9 | 66.34% | 22.30% | 22.90% | 20.40% | 20.80% | 23.60% | 84.08% | 95.98% | 1 |
1, C. gastrosuis sp. nov.; 2, C. mucosalis; 3, C. majalis; 4, C. suis; 5, C. pinnipediorum subsp. caledonicus; 6, C. pinnipediorum subsp. pinnipediorum; 7, C. coli; 8, C. jejuni subsp. doylei; 9, C. jejuni subsp. jejuni; The sequence used here is the same as in the phylogenomic analysis.