Skip to main content
Microorganisms logoLink to Microorganisms
. 2023 Sep 4;11(9):2229. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11092229

Real-World, Multicenter Case Series of Patients Treated with Isavuconazole for Invasive Fungal Disease in China

Lisha Wu 1,2,, Shougang Li 3,, Weixi Gao 4, Xiaojian Zhu 5, Pan Luo 1, Dong Xu 6, Dong Liu 1,*, Yan He 1,*
Editor: Stéphane Ranque
PMCID: PMC10535861  PMID: 37764073

Abstract

Background: The incidence of invasive fungal disease (IFD) has increased significantly, and IFD is a major cause of mortality among those with hematological malignancies. As a novel second-generation triazole antifungal drug offering both efficacy and safety, isavuconazole (ISA) is recommended by various guidelines internationally for the first-line treatment of invasive aspergillosis (IA) and invasive mucormycosis (IM) infecting adults. Given that it was only approved in China at the end of 2021, there is currently a lack of statistical data regarding its usage in the Chinese population. The primary objective of this report is to describe early experiences with ISA for the treatment of IFD. Methods: This was a real-world, multicenter, observational case series study conducted in China. It included patients from three centers who received ISA treatment from January 2022 to April 2023. A retrospective assessment on patient characteristics, variables related to ISA administration, the treatment response of IFD to ISA, and potential adverse events attributed to ISA was conducted. Results: A total of 40 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 12 (30%) were diagnosed with aspergillosis, 2 (5%) were diagnosed with candidiasis, 12 (30%) were diagnosed with mucormycosis, and 14 cases did not present mycological evidence. The predominant site of infection was the lungs (36), followed by the blood stream (8), sinuses (4), and respiratory tract (2). The overall response rate was 75% (30 patients), with male patients having a higher clinical response than female patients (24/24 versus 6/16, p = 0.000) and autologous stem cell transplant patients having a higher clinical response than allogeneic stem cell transplant patients (6/6 versus 4/10, p = 0.027). During the observation period, four patients experienced adverse effects associated with ISA, but none of them discontinued the treatment. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that ISA, a novel first-line treatment for IA and IM, is associated with a high clinical response rate, low incidence, and a low grade of adverse effects. Given the short time that ISA has been available in China, further research is needed to identify its efficacy and safety in the real world.

Keywords: isavuconazole, invasive fungal disease, clinical response, efficacy, safety

1. Introduction

IFD (invasive fungal disease), which generally occurs in immunocompromised populations (individuals with hematologic malignancies, individuals who have had solid organ or stem cell transplants, HIV-infected individuals, etc.), refers to diseases in which fungi invade the human body; grow and multiply in tissues, organs, or blood; and cause inflammatory reactions and tissue damage. IFDs are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among immunocompromised patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) and who have undergone stem cell transplants [1]. They pose a critical threat to public health and are an under-recognized component of antimicrobial resistance, an emerging crisis worldwide [2]. The most common pathogenic fungi are Candida and Aspergillus, while Mucor is rare. Fungalemia is more commonly caused by Candida. Pulmonary IFD is predominantly caused by filamentous fungi, of which Aspergillus is the main pathogenic bacteria [3]. It is worth noting that the infection rate of Mucor has gradually increased in recent years due to the use of triazole prophylaxis. The poor prognosis of IFD patients is attributable to difficulties in diagnosing IFD as well as the emergence of strains resistant to traditional triazoles and the elevated incidence of adverse effects brought on by amphotericin B (AmB) [3,4], which have caused great trouble for clinicians. Therefore, there is an urgent need to introduce a drug with a broad antimicrobial spectrum, high safety properties, excellent tolerability, and few drug interactions.

As a novel second-generation triazole, ISA was approved by the US FDA in 2015 as the first-line agent for invasive aspergillosis (IA) and invasive mucormycosis (IM) infecting adults, and it has also been recommended by certain guidelines internationally for the treatment of IA and IM [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. ISA inhibits the cytochrome lanosterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51) and destroys the structure and function of the fungal cell membrane by blocking the synthesis of ergosterol on the fungal cell membrane [12]. A special side chain of the ISA molecule has a strong affinity for the CYP51 protein, which endows it with a broad antifungal spectrum and efficacy against fungi resistant to other triazoles. ISA is currently available in capsule and intravenous formulations. Unlike the injectable forms of voriconazole (VOR) and posaconazole (POS), the water-soluble, intravenous form of ISA sulfate is not supplemented with the excipient sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin (SBECD) [12]. Furthermore, its oral absorption is not affected by food and stomach acid. As a consequence, ISA has provided the possibility to shift from an intravenous to an oral route and a once-daily frequency of administration, thus facilitating treatment compliance [13] as well as broadening the patient population to which it can be administered. Due to the results of a case–control trial [14], ISA became the sole first-line treatment approved by the FDA for IM therapy aside from AmB [9].

At present, the efficacy and safety of ISA have mainly been reported in clinical trials, rarely in real-world studies. Most of these studies have shown that ISA is not inferior to VOR and AmB with respect to the treatment of IFD, presenting a 35–87% clinical response and a 6–38% 42-day mortality [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Given that it was only approved in China at the end of 2021 for the treatment of IA and IM in adults, there is a lack of real-world evidence concerning the Chinese population. Therefore, the primary objective of this report was to describe the early Chinese experience with ISA for the treatment of IFD.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Population

This was a real-world, multicenter, observational case series study conducted at three medical centers in Hubei, China, between January 2022 and April 2023. Patients receiving ISA for the treatment of IFD were included. The included cases were treated with ISA in inpatient and/or outpatient settings. Cases where treatment status could not be assessed due to incomplete medical records were excluded from the study. The definition of clinical success was a favorable response to the treatment, which was assessed on Day 42 after initiating the ISA therapy. If the ISA treatment was not administered for a full 42 days, the assessment would be conducted at the end of the ISA treatment. Clinical improvement included a complete response and a partial response (improvement in clinical/radiologic findings but not complete resolution). We also aimed to describe the incidence of adverse effects as recorded in the patients’ electronic medical records.

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of each participating center prior to data collection. The study did not include factors that would have required patient consent.

2.2. Definitions

The revised 2020 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (EORTC/MSGERC) criteria [22] were adopted as the diagnostic criteria for IFD. A proven IFD was defined as the presence of documented histopathologic and microbiological evidence of IFD in a tissue biopsy or needle aspiration specimen obtained from a normally sterile site, excluding samples taken from BAL, cranial sinus cavity, and urine. A probable IFD was defined as the presence of at least one microbiological criterion (cytology, culture, or positive GM test results) along with one host factor (recent absolute neutrophil count, ANC < 500 cells/mL, allogeneic stem cell transplant, T-cell immune suppressant therapy, or prolonged corticosteroid use) and one clinical criterion (nodule, cavitary, or ground-glass opacities found via computed tomography (CT); tracheobronchitis; or sinonasal infection). A possible IFD was defined as the requirement for a host factor along with a radiological criterion (nodule, cavitary, and ground-glass opacities observed via CT).

According to the criteria for the efficacy of IFD treatment [1,23], breakthrough infection was defined as the development of a new definite, probable, or possible IFD after at least 7 days of prophylaxis with an antifungal treatment with adequate anti-mold coverage. A favorable response included the complete or partial resolution of clinical, radiologic, and microbiological findings. A complete response was defined as a complete clearance of clinical signs and symptoms, radiologic lesions identified earlier via chest X-ray or CT, and all relevant microbiological findings. Partial response was defined as a clinically significant improvement in signs and symptoms, improvement in radiologic abnormalities, and no related microbiological findings. Targeted treatment was defined as the use of ISA to treat the patients with proven/probable IFD. Empirical treatment was defined as the use of ISA to treat the patients with possible IFD. Safety outcomes included adverse events during treatment and the percentage of premature discontinuation of ISA. Possible adverse events associated with ISA included changes in liver function, kidney function, and electrocardiogram findings before and after the application of ISA. The level of adverse effects was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (Version 5.0). The death of a patient and the abandonment of treatment by the patient were classified as instances of treatment failure.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Fisher’s test and Mann–Whitney U test were used for tests of differences for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Significance tests were two-sided, and p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of Patients Included in the Study

A total of 40 patients were treated with ISA between January 2022 and April 2023, and the demographics of these patients are summarized in Table 1. A flowchart regarding the patients included and excluded in the analysis is shown in Figure 1. The characteristics of patients with IFD are listed in Table 2.

Table 1.

Main demographic and clinical characteristics of the study patients.

Characteristics Value
Age, y, median (range) 45.8 (9–72)
Male sex, n (%) 16 (40%)
Weight, Kg, median (range) 59 (35–96)
Disease type (%)
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma 8 (20%)
Acute myeloid leukemia 10 (25%)
Natural/killer T-cell lymphoma 2 (5%)
Follicular lymphoma 2 (5%)
Aplastic anemia 2 (5%)
T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma 2 (5%)
Mixed-phenotype acute leukemia 2 (5%)
Hemophagocytic syndrome 4 (10%)
Sepsis 2 (5%)
Fungal sinusitis 2 (5%)
Pulmonary mycosis 4 (10%)
IFD
Invasive aspergillosis 12 (30%)
Invasive candidiasis 2 (5%)
Invasive mucormycosis 12 (30%)
Unknown 14 (35%)
Morbidities
Diabetes mellitus 10 (25%)
Hepatic insufficiency 8 (20%)
Renal insufficiency 16 (40%)
Graft-versus-host disease 6 (15%)
Respiratory failure 4 (10%)
Autologous 6 (15%)
Allogeneic 10 (25%)
Site of infection
Pulmonary 36 (90%)
Paranasal sinuses 4 (10%)
Respiratory tract 2 (5%)
Bloodstream infections 6 (15%)
Classifications—IFD
Proven 2 (5%)
Probable 24 (60%)
Possible 14 (35%)
Outcome
Diagnosis of IFD
Partial remission 30 (75%)
Progression 7 (10%)
Dead 3 (15%)
Type of IFD
Invasive aspergillosis 8/12 (66.7%)
Invasive candidiasis 0/2 (0%)
Invasive mucormycosis 10/12 83.3%)
Site of infection
Pulmonary 26/36 (72.2%)
Paranasal sinuses 4/4 (100%)
Respiratory tract 2/2 (100%)
Bloodstream infections 6/8 (75%)
Therapy
Target treatment 18/26 (69.2%)
Empirical treatment 12/14 (85.7%)

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flowchart of patients included and excluded in this study.

Table 2.

Characteristics of IFD cases.

NO Gender Age Disease Type Outcome Site Key Evidence Diagnosis
1 Female 59 AML dead pulmonary CT; Candida albicans determined via phlegm culture Probable
2 Male 43 hemophagocytic syndrome partial remission pulmonary CT; febrile neutropenia Possible
3 Female 42 AML progression pulmonary Aspergillus determined via BAL fluid culture Probable
4 Male 54 natural/killer T-cell lymphoma partial remission pulmonary Aspergillus determined via blood mNGS; CT Probable
5 Male 72 DLBCL partial remission pulmonary/respiratory tract CT; Aspergillus determined via phlegm culture Probable
6 Female 43 aplastic anemia dead pulmonary/bloodstream infections Rhizomucor pusillus determined via blood mNGS; CT Probable
7 Male 52 DLBCL partial remission pulmonary CT; febrile neutropenia Possible
8 Male 22 AML partial remission pulmonary CT; febrile neutropenia Possible
9 Female 70 DLBCL partial remission pulmonary CT; febrile neutropenia Possible
10 Female 48 AML progression pulmonary CT; Aspergillus determined via phlegm culture Probable
11 Male 38 T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma partial remission pulmonary CT; Aspergillus determined via BAL fluid mNGS Probable
12 Male 57 sepsis partial remission pulmonary/bloodstream infections Rhizopus oryzae determined via mNGS; CT Probable
13 Male 20 mixed phenotype acute leukemia partial remission pulmonary Aspergillus determined via BAL fluid culture; CT Probable
14 Male 9 AML partial remission pulmonary CT; febrile neutropenia Possible
15 Female 40 hemophagocytic syndrome partial remission pulmonary/bloodstream infections Rhizomucor determined via mNGS; CT Probable
16 Female 66 DLBCL dead pulmonary CT; fever Possible
17 Male 61 follicular lymphoma partial remission Bloodstream infections/paranasal sinuses CT; Lichtheimia corymbifera determined via mNGS Probable
18 Female 33 pulmonary mycosis partial remission pulmonary History of Mycosis infection Possible
19 Male 52 fungal sinusitis partial remission paranasal sinuses Histopathology showing true hyphae (IM) Proven
20 Male 48 pulmonary mycosis partial remission pulmonary CT; Rhizopus delemar identified using fluid mNGS Probable
21 Female 58 DLBCL progression pulmonary CT; Candida albicans determined via phlegm culture Probable
22 Male 44 AML partial remission pulmonary CT; febrile neutropenia Possible
23 Male 50 hemophagocytic syndrome partial remission pulmonary CT; Fever Possible
24 Female 40 AML progression pulmonary Aspergillus determined via BAL fluid culture Probable
25 Male 56 natural/killer T-cell lymphoma partial remission pulmonary Blood GM test positive 1 time (IA); CT Probable
26 Male 16 AML partial remission pulmonary CT; febrile neutropenia Possible
27 Male 72 hemophagocytic syndrome partial remission pulmonary/respiratory tract Rhizopus oryzae determined via mNGS; CT Probable
28 Female 45 aplastic anemia progression pulmonary/bloodstream infections Rhizomucor determined via mNGS; CT Probable
29 Male 48 pulmonary mycosis partial remission pulmonary CT; Rhizopus delemar identified using fluid mNGS Probable
30 Male 55 sepsis partial remission pulmonary/bloodstream infections CT; Rhizomucor determined via mNGS Probable
31 Male 22 mixed phenotype acute leukemia partial remission pulmonary CT; febrile neutropenia Possible
32 Male 24 AML partial remission pulmonary CT; febrile neutropenia Possible
33 Female 68 AML partial remission pulmonary Aspergillus determined via BAL fluid culture; CT Probable
34 Female 50 fungal sinusitis progression pulmonary CT; Fever Possible
35 Male 40 T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma partial remission pulmonary Histopathology showing true hyphae (IM) Proven
36 Male 30 DLBCL partial remission paranasal sinuses CT; Aspergillus determined via BAL fluid mNGS Probable
37 Female 44 DLBCL partial remission pulmonary/Bloodstream infections CT; Aspergillus determined via phlegm culture Probable
38 Female 53 follicular lymphoma progression pulmonary CT; Aspergillus determined via phlegm culture Probable
39 Male 36 DLBCL partial remission Bloodstream infections/paranasal sinuses CT; Rhizomucor determined via mNGS Probable
40 Female 55 pulmonary mycosis partial remission pulmonary History of Mycosis infection Possible

AML: Acute myeloid leukemia. DLBCL: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The median age and weight of patients were 46 years (9–72) and 59 kg (35–96), respectively, and 16 patients (40%) were female, most of whom presented hematologic malignancies (28/40, 70.0%). The most common site of infection was the lungs (36/40), followed by the bloodstream (8/40), sinuses (4/40), and respiratory tract (2/40). There were 16 patients with a history of stem cell transplantation (6 autologous and 10 allogeneic); other common comorbidities included diabetes mellitus (10/40), hepatic insufficiency (8/40), renal insufficiency (16/40), graft-versus-host disease (6/40), and respiratory failure (4/40).

3.2. Treatment of ISA and Occurrence of IFD

Overall, there were 30 (75%) patients who achieved a clinical response, and clinical responses were higher among male patients than female patients (24/24 vs. 6/16, p = 0.000, Table 3). Clinical responses were higher for patients who had had an autologous stem cell transplant than they were for allogeneic stem cell transplant patients (6/6 vs. 4/10, p = 0.027, Table 3). The response rates were 66.7% (8/12), 0% (0/2), and 83.3% (10/12) for patients with IA, IC, and IM, respectively. Treatments provoked a response for 100% (2/2), 66.7% (16/24), and 85.7% (12/14) of patients with proven, probable, and possible fungal infections, respectively. In terms of the site of infection, the clinical response rates of the patients with pulmonary infection, sinus infection, respiratory tract infection, and bloodstream infection were 72.2% (26/36), 100% (4/4), 100% (2/2), and 75% (6/8), respectively. After treatment, 26 patients who had positive cultures before treatment yielded negative culture results. See Figure 2 for details.

Table 3.

Characteristics of patients presenting clinical response or clinical failure.

Characteristics Clinical Response
(n/Median, IQR)
Clinical Failure
(n/Median, IQR)
p
Age 44.4 (9–72) 50.4 (40–66) 0.235
Gender (male/female) 24/6 0/10 0.000 **
Allogeneic/autologous 6/4 0/6 0.027 **
Target treatment/empirical treatment 18/12 8/2 0.446

(** p < 0.05).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Distribution of clinical responses and failures in different subgroups of cases.

IA affected 12 patients with hematological malignancies, invasive candidiasis (IC) occurred in 2 patients with hematological malignancies, and IM infected 12 patients (5 with hematological malignancies). The remaining 14 (35%) patients failed to receive an etiological diagnosis.

3.3. Side Effects

Four (10%) patients experienced adverse effects associated with orally administered ISA, all of whom had grade 2 gastrointestinal disorders. However, they did not abandon the ISA treatment, because the adverse effects disappeared after switching to intravenous administration and rehydration. In addition, the ISA treatments were clinically effective for all patients.

4. Discussion

We conducted this study due to the fact that ISA was launched in China at the end of 2021 and to address the lack of real-world data for the Chinese population. This study also included two pediatric patients with hematological malignancies, thus filling the gap in the data for patients in this age group.

Previous reports showed that ISA had become a new option for the treatment of IFD, with an overall response rate of 35–87% [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. In our study, we had an overall response rate of 75%. In terms of infection sites, most patients had lung infections (90%, 36/40), for which the response rate was 72.2% (26/36), which is similar to the result reported by Cattaneo et al. [17], and sinus infection, respiratory tract infection, and bloodstream infection had response rates of 100.0% (4/4), 100.0% (2/2), and 75.0% (6/8), respectively. Regarding pathogens, the clinical response rates were different, with 66.7% (8/12) of patients infected with IA, 0% (0/2) of patients infected with IC, and 83.3% (10/12) of patients infected with IM. In our study, the main types of infections were IA and IM, and the incidence of IM tended to increase, which is consistent with previous reports [3,24].

A series of studies [25,26,27] demonstrated that there were no significant differences between VOR or POS prophylaxis and ISA prophylaxis with respect to the incidence or mortality of breakthrough IFD among patients with hematological oncology and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Data from another study [28] suggest that ISA is sufficiently efficient and secure for the treatment of patients after the failure of other azole and non-azole prophylaxis. Studies have shown that the emergence of resistant strains and inadequate drug concentrations are common probable causes of breakthroughs [29]. The non-attainment of plasma concentrations of POS due to various factors is considered a major risk factor for breakthrough IM [30], especially with POS suspension [7]. In our study, Case 2 was a patient with hemophagocytosis who did not experience breakthrough IFD during ISA prophylaxis. However, two weeks after discontinuing ISA treatment and switching to POS prophylaxis, the patient developed breakthrough IM and, ultimately, discontinued treatment due to septic shock.

ISA is not approved for the treatment of pediatric patients, but clinical studies have been published regarding the treatment of children with IA and IM. A foreign case series showed that ISA may be useful and safe for children with hematological malignancies, even in the case of stem cell transplantation [13]. Based on a meta study [31], among children who do not tolerate or respond to pre-existing indications, it is necessary to weigh the pros and cons of ISA administration before deciding whether to use it for treatment. According to the literature, pediatric patients should be administered a loading dose of 10 mg/kg q 8 h for 2 days and a maintenance dose of 10 mg/kg qd, with a maximum dose not exceeding that of adults [9]. In our study, two pediatric patients (9 and 16 years old) with acute myeloid leukemia who received off-label empirical treatment with ISA in adult doses achieved good results; these results enrich the data on the clinical experience of administering ISA to Chinese children. Although therapeutic drug monitoring of ISA among adults is currently considered controversial, the monitoring of blood concentrations and adverse effects is necessary due to the more rapid clearance of ISA in children [9,13,32].

Our study indicates that patients receiving ISA treatment, especially elderly patients, did not experience significant adverse reactions or drug interactions. Additionally, five patients switched to ISA due to experiencing adverse effects of VOR or AmB, and their clinical symptoms were relieved. Four patients experienced grade 2 adverse reactions (gastrointestinal), which were resolved by changing dosage forms and through clinical fluid replacement. The results of the SECURE [15] and VITAL [21] trials showed that ISA was not inferior to VOR and AmB with respect to the treatment of invasive mycosis, presenting better tolerability and fewer drug-related adverse events, thus favoring the use of ISA as the primary agent for treating IFD. Hamed et al. [33] conducted a post-hoc analysis of the SECURE and VITAL trials, and the results showed that patients over 65 had worse clinical outcomes than those under 65. Older patients are usually on multiple medications, so the concomitant application of triazoles might cause serious drug–drug interactions (DDIs). As with other triazoles, ISA is a substrate for cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4); CYP3A4 inducers such as rifampicin, carbamazepine, and long-acting barbiturates reduce the concentration of ISA. Remi Pieragostini et al. [34] conducted a single-center study in France showing that the blood concentration of ISA was generally higher than the recommended therapeutic reference range regardless of the patient’s basic condition and did not cause serious adverse effects. Meanwhile, despite the fact that ISA is a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A4, Groll et al. [35] believe that ISA has less of an effect on the plasma concentrations of vulnerable drugs such as cyclosporine compared to VOR and POS. Thus, with respect to reducing the occurrence of DDIs, ISA is a valuable addition to other triazole antifungal regimens [36,37], especially for older patients with IFD.

In our study, four patients experienced grade 2 adverse reactions (gastrointestinal), which were resolved via changing dosage forms and clinical fluid replacement. Generally speaking, the most common adverse effects associated with ISA are hepatic abnormalities and gastrointestinal disorders, including nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, which are mild symptoms and rarely lead to the drug’s discontinuation [16,18]. However, it is still worth noting that ISA might shorten QT interval duration, unlike other triazoles, which might cause QT interval prolongation [38], and should be avoided for patients with a family history of short QT intervals. Dipippo et al. [39] retrospectively analyzed 23 patients with leukemia, of which 20 patients developed POS-related hepatotoxicity, and after switching to ISA, elevated aminotransferases rapidly decreased to normal levels and hepatic function recovered. Three patients died during the observation period. Patient 1 died from tumor recurrence and central nervous system involvement leading to central respiratory failure. Patient 6 died from respiratory failure caused by severe intracranial infection after an allogeneic transplantation. Despite standardized treatment, Patient 13 had difficulty maintaining respiration and circulation, and his death was inevitable.

The Chinese Assessment of Antifungal Therapy in Hematological Disease study showed [40] that after 6 months, the incidence of IFD was significantly higher in allo-HSCT than it was in auto-HSCT recipients (9.2% versus 3.5%; p = 0.001), with a significantly higher mortality risk as well. In our study, 8 out of 10 allo-HSCT patients experienced proven/probable IFD, while 2 out of 6 auto-HSCT patients had possible IFD, which is consistent with the aforementioned studies. Unlike the 6 auto-HCT patients who all achieved a clinical response, only 4 out of 10 allo-HCT patients achieved a clinical response. This suggests that allo-HSCT is not only a risk factor for developing IFD but also for influencing the prognosis of IFD.

Cattaneo et al. [17] conducted a study on the use of ISA among hematological patients. The results showed that there was a better response to ISA among female patients compared to male patients. At the same time, another study [41] showed lower ISA clearance in women, particularly in elderly patients, which may be responsible for the higher plasma levels of ISA in women with subsequent better efficacy. Thus, it seems difficult to reconcile the contrary results in our study with those presented in the aforementioned studies. Faced with such results, we tentatively attempted to attribute the causes to race, population, the distribution of clinical characteristics or disease subtypes between genders, and this study’s small sample size. Further research is needed to expand this drug’s application findings in the Chinese population.

Our study has limitations. First, the sample size was small, and selection bias seemed inevitable. Second, the absence of a control group affected our ability to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of ISA. Again, this observational study relied primarily on historical electronic medical record data, which were not as comprehensive and up-to-date as they should be. Therefore, more prospective studies, as well as studies incorporating pediatric patients, are needed to validate the efficacy and safety of ISA, especially when used in hematology or as a combination therapy.

5. Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that real-world data about the use of ISA in Chinese populations has been described. Using clinical data from previous studies and the preliminary data within the limited scope of this study, we have confirmed the efficacy and safety of ISA in the Chinese population. Furthermore, it is important to note that certain provisional conclusions still need to be further validated through high-level evidence obtained from prospective clinical trials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.H. and X.Z.; Methodology, S.L., X.Z., P.L. and D.X.; Validation, P.L. and Y.H.; Formal analysis, L.W.; Investigation, W.G. and D.X.; Resources, S.L., W.G. and X.Z.; Data curation, D.L.; Writing—original draft, L.W.; Writing—review & editing, Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical constraints.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Chinese Association Hematologists. Chinese Invasive Fungal Infection Working Group The Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of invasive fungal disease in patients with hematological disorders and cancers (the 6th revision) Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2020;59:754–763. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20200627-00624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gow N.A.R., Johnson C., Berman J., Coste A.T., Cuomo C.A., Perlin D.S., Bicanic T., Harrison T.S., Wiederhold N., Bromley M., et al. The importance of antimicrobial resistance in medical mycology. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:5352. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32249-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lamoth F., Chung S.J., Damonti L., Alexander B.D. Changing Epidemiology of Invasive Mold Infections in Patients Receiving Azole Prophylaxis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017;64:1619–1621. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sun Y., Huang H., Chen J., Li J., Ma J., Li J., Liang Y., Wang J., Li Y., Yu K., et al. Invasive fungal infection in patients receiving chemotherapy for hematological malignancy: A multicenter, prospective, observational study in China. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:757–767. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2649-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Patterson T.F., Thompson G.R., 3rd, Denning D.W., Fishman J.A., Hadley S., Herbrecht R., Kontoyiannis D.P., Marr K.A., Morrison V.A., Nguyen M.H., et al. Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016;63:e1–e60. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Garcia-Vidal C., Alastruey-Izquierdo A., Aguilar-Guisado M., Carratalà J., Castro C., Fernández-Ruiz M., Aguado J.M., Fernández J.M., Fortún J., Garnacho-Montero J., et al. Executive summary of clinical practice guideline for the management of invasive diseases caused by Aspergillus: 2018 Update by the GEMICOMED-SEIMC/REIPI. Enfermedades Infecc. Y Microbiol. Clin. Engl. Ed. 2019;37:535–541. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2018.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cornely O.A., Alastruey-Izquierdo A., Arenz D., Chen S.C.A., Dannaoui E., Hochhegger B., Hoenigl M., Jensen H.E., Lagrou K., Lewis R.E., et al. Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of mucormycosis: An initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology in cooperation with the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019;19:e405–e421. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30312-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Koehler P., Bassetti M., Chakrabarti A., Chen S.C.A., Colombo A.L., Hoenigl M., Klimko N., Lass-Flörl C., Oladele R.O., Vinh D.C., et al. Defining and managing COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis: The 2020 ECMM/ISHAM consensus criteria for research and clinical guidance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021;21:e149–e162. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30847-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Anti-infection Group of Hematology Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Hematology Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University Consensus recommendations for the clinical application of isavuconazole. Lin Chuang Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2023;36:295–302. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1004-2806.2023.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Medical Mycology Society of Chinese Medicine and Education Association. Chinese Society of Hematology, Chinese Medical Association Chinese expert consensus for invasive fungal disease in patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2023;44:92–97. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2023.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Medical Mycology Society of Chinese Medicine and Education Association. Chinese Mucormycosis Expert Consensus Group Expert consensus on diagnosis and management of mucormycosis in China. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2023;62:597–605. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20220729-00557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ananda-Rajah M.R., Kontoyiannis D. Isavuconazole: A new extended spectrum triazole for invasive mold diseases. Future Microbiol. 2015;10:693–708. doi: 10.2217/fmb.15.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Decembrino N., Perruccio K., Zecca M., Colombini A., Calore E., Muggeo P., Soncini E., Comelli A., Molinaro M., Goffredo B.M., et al. A Case Series and Literature Review of Isavuconazole Use in Pediatric Patients with Hemato-oncologic Diseases and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020;64:e01783-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01783-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Marty F.M., Cornely O.A., Mullane K.M., Ostrosky-Zeichner L., Maher R.M., Croos-Dabrera R., Lu Q., Lademacher C., Oren I., Schmitt-Hoffmann A.H., et al. Isavuconazole for treatment of invasive fungal diseases caused by more than one fungal species. Mycoses. 2018;61:485–497. doi: 10.1111/myc.12777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Maertens J.A., Raad I.I., Marr K.A., Patterson T.F., Kontoyiannis D.P., Cornely O.A., Bow E.J., Rahav G., Neofytos D., Aoun M., et al. Isavuconazole versus voriconazole for primary treatment of invasive mould disease caused by Aspergillus and other filamentous fungi (SECURE): A phase 3, randomised-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016;387:760–769. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01159-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dagher H., Hachem R., Chaftari A.M., Jiang Y., Ali S., Deeba R., Shah S., Raad I. Real-World Use of Isavuconazole as Primary Therapy for Invasive Fungal Infections in High-Risk Patients with Hematologic Malignancy or Stem Cell Transplant. J. Fungi. 2022;8:74. doi: 10.3390/jof8010074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cattaneo C., Busca A., Gramegna D., Farina F., Candoni A., Piedimonte M., Fracchiolla N., Pagani C., Principe M.I.D., Tisi M.C., et al. Isavuconazole in Hematological Patients: Results of a Real-Life Multicentre Observational Seifem Study. HemaSphere. 2019;3:e320. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Monforte A., Los-Arcos I., Martín-Gómez M.T., Campany-Herrero D., Sacanell J., Berastegui C., Márquez-Algaba E., Sempere A., Nuvials X., Deu M., et al. Safety and Effectiveness of Isavuconazole Treatment for Fungal Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients (ISASOT Study) Microbiol. Spectr. 2022;10:e0178421. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01784-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fernández-Ruiz M., Bodro M., Gutiérrez Martín I., Rodriguez-Álvarez R., Ruiz-Ruigómez M., Sabé N., López-Viñau T., Valerio M., Illaro A., Fortún J., et al. Isavuconazole for the Treatment of Invasive Mold Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Study on Efficacy and Safety in Real-life Clinical Practice. Transplantation. 2023;107:762–773. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zurl C., Waller M., Schwameis F., Muhr T., Bauer N., Zollner-Schwetz I., Valentin T., Meinitzer A., Ullrich E., Wunsch S., et al. Isavuconazole Treatment in a Mixed Patient Cohort with Invasive Fungal Infections: Outcome, Tolerability and Clinical Implications of Isavuconazole Plasma Concentrations. J. Fungi. 2020;6:90. doi: 10.3390/jof6020090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Marty F.M., Ostrosky-Zeichner L., Cornely O.A., Mullane K.M., Perfect J.R., Thompson G.R., 3rd, Alangaden G.J., Brown J.M., Fredricks D.N., Heinz W.J., et al. Isavuconazole treatment for mucormycosis: A single-arm open-label trial and case-control analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016;16:828–837. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00071-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Donnelly J.P., Chen S.C., Kauffman C.A., Steinbach W.J., Baddley J.W., Verweij P.E., Clancy C.J., Wingard J.R., Lockhart S.R., Groll A.H., et al. Revision and Update of the Consensus Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;71:1367–1376. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Segal B.H., Herbrecht R., Stevens D.A., Ostrosky-Zeichner L., Sobel J., Viscoli C., Walsh T.J., Maertens J., Patterson T.F., Perfect J.R., et al. Defining responses to therapy and study outcomes in clinical trials of invasive fungal diseases: Mycoses Study Group and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus criteria. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008;47:674–683. doi: 10.1086/590566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wei L.W., Zhu P.Q., Chen X.Q., Yu J. Mucormycosis in Mainland China: A Systematic Review of Case Reports. Mycopathologia. 2022;187:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11046-021-00607-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stern A., Su Y., Lee Y.J., Seo S., Shaffer B., Tamari R., Gyurkocza B., Barker J., Bogler Y., Giralt S., et al. A Single-Center, Open-Label Trial of Isavuconazole Prophylaxis against Invasive Fungal Infection in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020;26:1195–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vu C.A., Rana M.M., Jacobs S.E., Saunders-Hao P. Isavuconazole for the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal disease: A single-center experience. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2021;23:e13469. doi: 10.1111/tid.13469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Scott S.A., Perry C., Mahmoudjafari Z., Martin G.A., Boyd S., Thompson J., Thomas B. Incidence of breakthrough fungal infections on isavuconazole prophylaxis compared to posaconazole and voriconazole. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2023;25:e14045. doi: 10.1111/tid.14045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hassouna H., Athans V., Brizendine K.D. Real-world use-Isavuconazole at a large academic medical center. Mycoses. 2019;62:534–541. doi: 10.1111/myc.12910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Maschmeyer G., Patterson T.F. Our 2014 approach to breakthrough invasive fungal infections. Mycoses. 2014;57:645–651. doi: 10.1111/myc.12213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lerolle N., Raffoux E., Socie G., Touratier S., Sauvageon H., Porcher R., Bretagne S., Bergeron A., Azoulay E., Molina J.M., et al. Breakthrough invasive fungal disease in patients receiving posaconazole primary prophylaxis: A 4-year study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014;20:O952–O959. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ashkenazi-Hoffnung L., Bilavsky E., Levy I., Grisaru G., Sadot E., Ben-Ami R., Novikov A., Fischer S., Nahum E., Scheuerman O. Isavuconazole As Successful Salvage Therapy for Mucormycosis in Pediatric Patients. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2020;39:718–724. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Autmizguine J., Guptill J.T., Cohen-Wolkowiez M., Benjamin D.K., Jr., Capparelli E.V. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antifungals in children: Clinical implications. Drugs. 2014;74:891–909. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0227-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hamed K., Engelhardt M., Kovanda L.L., Huang J.J., Yan J., Aram J.A. Post-hoc analysis of the safety and efficacy of isavuconazole in older patients with invasive fungal disease from the VITAL and SECURE studies. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:6730. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31788-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pieragostini R., Xhaard A., Sauvageon H., Madelaine I., Touratier S., Denis B. Context of instauration and evolution under isavuconazole, a 2-year prospective real-life study. Med. Mycol. 2023;61:myad033. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myad033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Groll A.H., Townsend R., Desai A., Azie N., Jones M., Engelhardt M., Schmitt-Hoffman A.H., Brüggemann R.J.M. Drug-drug interactions between triazole antifungal agents used to treat invasive aspergillosis and immunosuppressants metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2017;19:e12751. doi: 10.1111/tid.12751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Groll A.H., Desai A., Han D., Howieson C., Kato K., Akhtar S., Kowalski D., Lademacher C., Lewis W., Pearlman H., et al. Pharmacokinetic Assessment of Drug-Drug Interactions of Isavuconazole With the Immunosuppressants Cyclosporine, Mycophenolic Acid, Prednisolone, Sirolimus, and Tacrolimus in Healthy Adults. Clin. Pharmacol. Drug Dev. 2017;6:76–85. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Townsend R., Dietz A., Hale C., Akhtar S., Kowalski D., Lademacher C., Lasseter K., Pearlman H., Rammelsberg D., Schmitt-Hoffmann A., et al. Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of CYP3A4-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions of Isavuconazole With Rifampin, Ketoconazole, Midazolam, and Ethinyl Estradiol/Norethindrone in Healthy Adults. Clin. Pharmacol. Drug Dev. 2017;6:44–53. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Keirns J., Desai A., Kowalski D., Lademacher C., Mujais S., Parker B., Schneidkraut M.J., Townsend R., Wojtkowski T., Yamazaki T., et al. QT Interval Shortening With Isavuconazole: In Vitro and In Vivo Effects on Cardiac Repolarization. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017;101:782–790. doi: 10.1002/cpt.620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.DiPippo A.J., Rausch C.R., Kontoyiannis D.P. Tolerability of isavuconazole after posaconazole toxicity in leukaemia patients. Mycoses. 2019;62:81–86. doi: 10.1111/myc.12851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sun Y., Meng F., Han M., Zhang X., Yu L., Huang H., Wu D., Ren H., Wang C., Shen Z., et al. Epidemiology, management, and outcome of invasive fungal disease in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China: A multicenter prospective observational study. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:1117–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Desai A.V., Han D., Kowalski D.L., Lademacher C., Pearlman H., Yamazaki T. No Dose Adjustment for Isavuconazole Based on Age or Sex. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e02629. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02629-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical constraints.


Articles from Microorganisms are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES