Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 6;28(18):6474. doi: 10.3390/molecules28186474

Table 4.

Comparison of dyes removal efficiency of Cu/Ni/rGO with Cu/Ni nanoparticles.

Adsorbing Catalyst Synthesis Methdology Light Source Dye Removal Efficiency Degradation Time Reference
Cu/NiO nanoparticles Coprecipitaion
method
Visible Methylene blue 89% 50 min [37]
Cu/NiO nanopartciles Coprecipitaion
method
Visible Alizarin R 90% 60 min [38]
Cu/NiO nanoparticles Coprecipitaion
method
Visible Erichrome black-T
Methylene blue
51% 90 min [39]
Cu/NiO nanoparticles Green synthesis
(Okra plant)
UV-light Methylene blue 78% 105 min [40]
Cu/Ni nanoparticles Green systhesis
(Zingiber officinale)
UV-light Crystal violet 95% 160 min [41]
Cu/Ni/rGO Green synthesis (Dypsislutescens plant) Tungsten lamp Rhodamin B 91% 20 min Present work
Cu/Ni/rGO Green synthesis (Dypsislutescens plant) Tungsten lamp Alizarin R 90% 20 min Present work