Table 1.
True-positive and false-positive rates.
| Disease | Patients with verified SAID |
Patients with other verified SAID |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP before curation |
TP after curation |
FP before curation |
FP after curation |
|
| AISIMD | 1 (3) | 1 (3) | 0 | 0 |
| BLAUS | 1 (3) | 1 (3) | 0 | 0 |
| DADA2 | 7 (11) | 6 (11) | 17 | 9 |
| FMF | 7 (16) | 3 (16) | 2 | 2 |
| HIDS | 1 (3) | 1 (3) | 10 | 4 |
| MWS | 4 (7) | 6 (7) | 6 | 22 |
| PAAND | 0 (3) | 0 (3) | 1 | 0 |
| PAPA | 3 (3) | 3 (3) | 1 | 5 |
| TRAPS | 1 (5) | 2 (5) | 2 | 8 |
| VEXAS | 3 (7) | 6 (7) | 6 | 8 |
| Total | 28 (61) 46% |
29 (61) 48% |
45 | 58 |
The number of true positives (TPs) before and after curation is shown in the second and third columns, respectively, with the total number of verified cases shown in parentheses. The number of false positives (FPs) before and after curation is shown in the fourth and fifth columns, respectively. It is important to note that this is a stricter comparison of the ranking than the comparison shown in Figure 2 , as we are only including diseases with three or more verified cases and only comparing diseases from Ranks 1 to 3 (n = 61).