Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 12;11:1218312. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1218312

Table 3.

Comparison of rates of clinically inactive disease in those receiving IL-1 or IL-6 blockade within the first 3-months of diagnosis versus those that did not.

3-month follow-up n = 76 12-month follow-up n = 63e,f Last follow-up n = 76
3.1 months (2.7–3.8) 12 months (11.1–13.3) 4.7 years (2.2–9.2)
Early-bioa No early-biob Early- bioa No early-biob Early-bioa No early-biob
Clinically inactive diseasec 23/40 (58%) 21/36 (58%) 26/29e (90%) 18/34f (53%) 36/40 (90%) 31/36 (86%)
ns p = 0.002 ns
Treatment-free clinically inactive disease (remission) 1/40 (3%) 2/36 (6%) 0/29 (0%) 3/34 (9%) 8/40 (20%) 16/36 (42%)
ns ns p = 0.028
Glucocorticoid-free clinically inactive diseased 7/40 (18%) 7/36 (19%) 20/29 (69%) 16/34 (47%) 34/40 (85%) 30/36 (83%)
ns ns ns

Median age presented along with interquartile range (IQR). Absolute frequencies presented along with percentages.

a

Patients who received either IL-1 or IL-6 blockade within 3 months from diagnosis.

b

Patients who did not receive IL-1 or IL-6 blockade within 3 months from diagnosis (irrespective of whether they received those treatments after this time point).

c

CID irrespective of current treatment status.

d

CID, off glucocorticoids (irrespective of other treatments received).

e

Missing data, n = 1; time point not reached n = 9.

f

Missing data, n = 2; time point not reached n = 1. ns (not significant) at p < 0.05 using Fisher's exact test. Shaded cells denote significantly different comparisons.