Table 3.
Reliability of the factors, and replicability index
| Factors | ORION Reliability | Cronbrach’s Alpha (α) | G- H* Index |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1: Impact of simulation on care (6) | 0.918 | 0.758 | 0.902 |
| F2: Benefits of feedback in simulation (3) | 0.903 | 0.701 | 0.915 |
| F3: Benefits or usefulness of pre-planning (objectives, infrastructure) (4) | 0.772 | 0.612 | 0.846 |
| F4. Benefits on teamwork and critical thinking (4) | 0.914 | 0.759 | 0.910 |
| F5. Benefits on learning, safety and confidence | 0.924 | 0.812 | 0.870 |
| F6. Benefits on communication with patient and family | 0.818 | 0.709 | 0.810 |
* The H-index evaluates how well a set of elements represents a common factor. It is bounded between 0 and 1 and approaches unity as the magnitude of factor loadings and/or the number of items increases. High H values (>0.80) suggest a well-defined latent variable, which is more likely to be stable across studies, while low H values suggest a poorly defined latent variable, which is likely to change across studies [34].