Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 16;15(18):4005. doi: 10.3390/nu15184005

Table 2.

Associations of UPF consumption with overweight or obesity.

Quartile of UPFs (g/day)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 p Trend
Overweight or obesity
      Median 3.3 10.9 23.5 60.8
      Model 1 1.00 (ref) 1.16 (1.10, 1.23) *** 1.14 (1.08, 1.21) *** 1.08 (1.02, 1.14) * 0.182
      Model 2 1.00 (ref) 1.14 (1.08, 1.21) *** 1.13 (1.06, 1.20) *** 1.08 (1.02, 1.14) * 0.690
      Model 3 1.00 (ref) 1.14 (1.07, 1.20) *** 1.10 (1.04, 1.17) ** 1.03 (0.97, 1.09) 0.241
Overweight
      Median 3.3 11.6 26.5 67.0
      Model 1 1.00 (ref) 1.18 (1.10, 1.25) *** 1.13 (1.06, 1.21) *** 1.08 (1.01, 1.15) * 0.929
      Model 2 1.00 (ref) 1.15 (1.08, 1.22) *** 1.11 (1.04, 1.19) *** 1.07 (1.01, 1.15) * 0.836
      Model 3 1.00 (ref) 1.15 (1.08, 1.22) *** 1.10 (1.03, 1.17) *** 1.03 (0.97, 1.10) 0.236
Obesity
      Median 3.4 11.4 25.0 63.5
      Model 1 1.00 (ref) 1.11 (1.01, 1.23) * 1.19 (1.08, 1.32) *** 1.07 (0.97, 1.19) 0.739
      Model 2 1.00 (ref) 1.10 (1.00, 1.22) 1.19 (1.08, 1.32) *** 1.09 (0.98, 1.20) 0.499
      Model 3 1.00 (ref) 1.09 (0.99, 1.21) 1.15 (1.04, 1.27) ** 1.02 (0.92, 1.14) 0.556

* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Model 1 adjusted gender, age, education level, individual annual income, and occupation; Model 2 further adjusted drinking past month, labor intensity, and place and region of residence based on Model 1; Model 3 further adjusted total energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, vitamin A, vitamin C, calcium, and sodium intake based on Model 2.