Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 18;15(9):576. doi: 10.3390/toxins15090576

Table 3.

Occurrence of AFs and OTA in dates marketed in various countries.

Country Mycotoxin No. of Samples Positive, n (%) Range (μg/kg) Mean (μg/kg) Method Reference
Brazil OTA 10 2 (20) 0.1–5 NR a HPLC-FLD b [47]
China OTA 40 9 (23) c LOD–61.4 NR LC-MS/MS d [100]
Egypt AFB1 28 1 (4) 14.4 14.4 LC-MS/MS [32]
Egypt OTA 28 3 (11) 1.48–6070 NR LC-MS/MS [32]
Iran OTA 10 2 (20) 1.4–3.6 2.5 ELISA e [58]
Iran AFs 22 9 (41) 0.9–8.1 2.6 HPLC-FLD [92]
Iran OTA 22 5 (23) 0.5–2.1 1.2 HPLC-FLD [92]
Pakistan AFs 17 5 (30) LOD–15.50 3.90 HPLC-FLD [63]
Pakistan AFs 8 2 (25) 2.1–2.9 2.5 HPLC-FLD [80]
Pakistan AFs 15 9 (60) LOD–18.8 6.32 HPLC-FLD [81]
Pakistan AFs 96 38 (40) LOD-26.6 4.11 HPLC-FLD [101]
Pakistan AFs 170 25 (15) 0.24–5.87 NR HPLC-FLD [102]
Tunisia OTA 48 18 (38) 0.57–3.34 1.26 LC-MS/MS [32]
Yemen AFs 20 2 (10) 110–180 145 TLC f [103]

a NR: not reported. b HPLC: high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with fluorescence detection. c LOD: limit of detection. d LC-MS/MS: liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. e ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. f TLC: thin-layer chromatography.