Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 18.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Use Misuse. 2023 Aug 18;58(13):1780–1788. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2247076

Table 1.

State PSC Coordinators’ Perceptions of Treatment Issues

Perception Statements Respondents who Strongly Agree/Agree
n (%)
Respondents who Disagree/Strongly Disagree
n (%)
Respondents who Do not know
n (%)
Treatment
MOUD is an effective method for reducing illicit opioid use 39 (91%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Statewide policy focuses more on access to treatment than punishment for opioid use 31 (72%) 5 (12%) 6 (14%)
MOUD providers are not careful in monitoring the participants, and may not recognize when they abuse it 14 (32%) 22 (51%) 5 (12%)
Our state’s PSCs favor drug-free treatment over the use of MOUD services 12 (28%) 24 (56%) 5 (12%)
Only certain types of MOUD services should be used for participants in our PSCs 11 (26%) 25 (58%) 5 (12%)
Even when participants use MOUD services as prescribed, they get high from it 5 (12%) 30 (70%) 6 (14%)
Barriers
Lack of transportation is an issue for engagement with PSCs across the state 40 (93%) 0 (0%) 1 (2%)
The distance to travel to services affects how often participants attend treatment 34 (79%) 5 (12%) 2 (5%)
The frequency of treatment services makes holding a steady job difficult for participants 22 (51%) 18 (42%) 1 (2%)
MOUD treatment appointments are not convenient for participants’ schedules 22 (51%) 8 (19%) 11 (26%)
State funding is adequate to operate all PSCs 8 (19%) 31 (72%) 1 (2%)