Table 3.
Perception Statements (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = agree, 4 = strongly agree) |
State Coordinators (n = 42) M (SD) |
Local Coordinators (n = 849) M (SD) |
---|---|---|
If participants miss a scheduled court date, they shouldn’t be allowed to continue MOUD*** | 1.37 (0.63) | 1.82 (0.64) |
If participants have a history of diverting their medication, they should not be prescribed MOUD*** | 1.68 (0.77) | 2.12 (0.72) |
The frequency of treatment services makes no-shows more likely | 2.18 (0.76) | 2.09 (0.64) |
MOUD burdens court staff to ensure participants are not diverting their medication** | 1.91 (0.89) | 2.32 (0.74) |
There is a perception in the courts that MOUD is “just substituting one drug for another” | 2.38 (0.91) | 2.22 (0.83) |
p < 0.01**
p < 0.001***