. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 28.

Published in final edited form as: Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2018 May 31;17(5):1533–1542. doi: 10.1007/s10237-018-1039-2

Table 1:

Comparison of end-systolic fiber stress (kPa) between the MI control group and hydrogel treated group in the Remote, Border zone, and Infarct regions, respectively. *p < 0.05 compared to MI control.

	Remote	Border zone	Infarct
MI control	21.86±1.51	29.84±1.98	47.25±6.14
Hydrogel treated	14.12±2.31*	19.53±1.69*	28.49±3.78*