Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 28;13:16352. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43449-4

Table 3.

Published studies of the incidence of VTE in pelvic or acetabular fractures.

Study Patient number VTE number Overall incidence (%) Prophylaxis Screening method Risk factors
Montgomery et al.2 101 38 38 P + IVCF MRV Time to surgery
Stannard et al.27 107 15 14 M U + MRV Age, time to surgery
Steele et al.21 103 11 11 P U High ISS, delayed use of LMWH
*Kim et al.11 95 32 34 N/A CTV Age, VS type fracture
*Sen et al.5 56 15 26.8 None CTV None
*Wang et al.6 95 32 34 N/A Age, time to surgery
*Niikura et al.3 126 38 30 M U, CT (+) Multiple fractures
*Niikura et al.4 46 19 41 M U, CT (+) N/A
Lowe et al.20 750 10 1 M + P N/A None

VTE, venous thromboembolic event; P, pharmacological thromboprophylaxis; IVCF, inferior vena cava filter; M, mechanical thromboprophylaxis; MRV, magnetic resonance venography; U, ultrasonography; CTV, computed tomography venography; CT (+), computed tomography with contrast; ISS, injury severity score; LMWH, low molecular weight heparin; VS, vertical shear; N/A, not applicable.

*Studies reporting the incidence of VTE in Asian patients with pelvic and/or acetabular fracture.