Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 14;14:1250808. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1250808

Table 1.

Comparison between US and MRI in terms of affordability, clinical application, image quality and suitability for various clinical settings.

Criteria Ultrasound MRI
Cost Less expensive More expensive
Accessibility Widely available Limited availability
Safety Non-invasive and no radiation exposure Non-invasive but exposure to magnetic field and radio waves
Imaging speed Real-time imaging Longer acquisition time
Image quality Good for superficial structures, bones, and joints Better for soft tissue contrast
Sensitivity Can detect small nerve injuries High sensitivity
Specificity Less specific in determining the type of injury More specific in determining the type of injury
Patient comfort Comfortable and well-tolerated Claustrophobic and noisy environment
Operator dependency Highly operator-dependent Less operator-dependent
Suitability for different types of injuries Suitable for evaluating peripheral nerve entrapment and focal neuropathies Suitable for evaluating more complex injuries, such as nerve root avulsion or plexus injuries