Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 10;3:118. Originally published 2023 Jul 21. [Version 3] doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16116.3

Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the Scoping Review in correspondence with the "Participants, Concept and Context, PCC" mnemonic and evidence types and sources.

Inclusion criteria Exclusion
criteria
P articipants
Potential other effective
area-based conservation
measures (OECMs)
Potential OECMs governed under a range of governance types i.e., by
governments (at various levels), private individuals, organizations or
companies, indigenous peoples and local communities and shared
governance (i.e., governance by various rights holders and stakeholders
together).
Potential OECMs established by all sectors (e.g., transport, offshore
energy, fisheries, aquaculture, maritime, tourism, defence, archaeological
heritages, etc.).
Potential OECMs with primary, secondary or ancillary conservation
objectives.
---
C oncept
Assessing potential OECMs
All studies that assess potential OECMs.
All types of methodologies and metrics applied to assess the effectiveness
of potential OECMs to deliver biodiversity conservation outcomes and
contribute to spatial conservation targets.
---
C ontext
Global terrestrial,
freshwater and marine
realm
Studies in:
  -  terrestrial, freshwater and marine realms,
  -  globally
---
EVIDENCE TYPES &
SOURCES
  -  peer-review literature
  -  grey literature
  -  all years of publication
  -  all publication stages, subject areas, and source types
  -  experimental and observational studies
  -  studies published in languages competent to the researchers’ team
(e.g., English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Spanish, etc.)
Evidence
synthesis such
as systematic,
scoping,
rapid, and
narrative
reviews