Table 4.
Results of multivariable logistic regression of Salmonella risk categorisation on pig farms (n = 250)
Variable | Category | Higher risk | Lower risk | % Higher risk | Odds ratio | 95% Confidence interval | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||||||
No. of sows | 0 | 18 | 47 | 27.7 | 1.000 | |||
<400 | 4 | 81 | 4.7 | 0.099 | 0.026 | 0.371 | 0.001 | |
401–1000 | 7 | 30 | 18.9 | 0.686 | 0.184 | 2.558 | 0.574 | |
1000+ | 4 | 19 | 17.4 | 1.407 | 0.278 | 7.124 | 0.680 | |
Not known | 8 | 32 | 20.0 | 0.539 | 0.165 | 1.757 | 0.305 | |
Are rodent baits used in the surroundings of the farm enclosures? | No | 18 | 45 | 28.6 | 1.000 | |||
Yes | 22 | 147 | 13.0 | 0.265 | 0.105 | 0.668 | 0.005 | |
NA | 1 | 17 | 5.6 | 0.151 | 0.013 | 1.778 | 0.133 | |
Are stay-behinds always isolated from the healthy ones (in physically separated hospital area / or by euthanasia)? | No | 19 | 55 | 25.7 | 1.000 | |||
Yes | 21 | 147 | 12.5 | 0.280 | 0.112 | 0.700 | 0.006 | |
N/A | 1 | 6 | 14.3 | 0.338 | 0.030 | 3.815 | 0.381 | |
Is the floor in each anteroom / hygiene lock even / without damages and thereby easy to clean and to disinfect? | Yes | 37 | 164 | 18.4 | 1.000 | |||
No | 4 | 45 | 8.2 | 0.156 | 0.040 | 0.601 | 0.007 | |
Are all farm buildings/ fields surrounded by a perimeter fence? | Single or double fenced | 31 | 123 | 20.1 | 1.000 | |||
No | 9 | 64 | 12.3 | 0.191 | 0.062 | 0.589 | 0.004 | |
Partly interrupted | 1 | 22 | 4.3 | 0.093 | 0.010 | 0.853 | 0.036 | |
Which standard cleaning and disinfection procedures are used in the farrowing barns between batches? – Downtime (at least 3 days) | No | 34 | 130 | 20.7 | 1.000 | |||
Yes | 7 | 79 | 8.1 | 0.252 | 0.079 | 0.803 | 0.020 | |
What kind of flooring system is in the barn sections for fatteners? | Any other flooring | 23 | 66 | 25.8 | 1.000 | |||
Only solid floor | 3 | 29 | 9.4 | 0.209 | 0.042 | 1.047 | 0.057 | |
Only full slats | 9 | 69 | 11.5 | 0.293 | 0.103 | 0.833 | 0.021 | |
Not present/missing | 6 | 45 | 11.8 | 0.352 | 0.102 | 1.214 | 0.098 |