Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Sep 29;18(9):e0292371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292371

Greater nurse density correlates to higher level of population ageing globally, but is more prominent in developed countries

Wenpeng You 1,2,3,*, Frank Donnelly 1
Editor: Alice Mannocci4
PMCID: PMC10540962  PMID: 37773937

Abstract

Background

Representing over 50% of the healthcare workforce, nurses provide care to people at all ages. This study advances, at a population level, that high levels of nursing services, measured by nurse density may significantly promote population ageing measured by the percentage of a population over 65 years of age (65yo%).

Methods

Population level data was examined to explore the correlation between nurse density and 65yo%. The confounding impacts on ageing such as the effects of economic affluence, physician density, fertility rate, obesity and urban advantages were also considered. Scatter plots, bivariate correlation, partial correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were performed for examining the correlations.

Results

Nurse density correlated to 65yo%; this relationship was independent of other influences such as fertility rate, economic affluence, obesity prevalence, physician density and urban advantages. Second to fertility rate, nursing density had the greatest influence on 65yo%. The predicting and confounding variables explain 74.4% of the total 65yo% variance. The universal correlations identified in country groupings suggest that low nurse density may be a significant global concern.

Conclusions

While nurse density might contribute significantly to 65yo% globally, the effect was more prominent in developed countries. Ironically, countries with higher nurse densities and therefore greater levels of 65yo%, were countries with an increased need for more nursing staff. To highlight the profound implications for the role the nursing profession plays especially at a time of global nursing shortage, further study into the effects of long-run elasticity of nurse staffing level on population ageing may be needed. For instance, what percentage of nursing staff increase would be required to meet every 1% increase of an ageing population.

Introduction

Over the last 200 years, people around the world have achieved impressive progress in health represented by an increase of the number of people aged 65 and over. Population ageing refers to changes in the age composition of a population which increases the proportion of older persons. It has become the 21st century’s dominant demographic measure. Demographically, the most often used index of population ageing is the percentage of population segment aged 65 and over (65yo% hereafter) [1, 2].

It is well-established that declining fertility rates and rising life expectancy are the primary causes for population ageing [36]. Without sustainable numbers of younger people to replace the ageing population, the relative size of the population segment aged 65 years old or over will continue to increase. Improved economic circumstances have been exacerbating this impact because of increased welfare and life satisfaction [7]. Other studies identify factors, such as education [8] and genetic traits [9] that may also be contributing factors impacting population ageing.

The evolution of the nursing workforce into an independent health care profession is evident as nurses now account for over 50% of the global healthcare industry [10]. Worldwide, nurses have and will continue to play a critical role in health promotion, disease prevention and delivery of a comprehensive range of healthcare services [10]. Within primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare settings, the scope of nursing healthcare has afforded nurses’ opportunities to lead and coordinate patient care provided by multidisciplinary health professionals. Therefore, the quality of healthcare from nurses should be considered a core indicator of a populations level of healthcare. Previous studies, for example, have revealed that nursing workforce plays a significant role in reducing infant and neonatal mortalities [11] and life expectancy at birth and at 65 years old [12, 13]. An outcome from the role of nursing workforce in promoting population health has been an increase in the number of who survive past 65 years old.

Ironically, as the population of many countries pushing past 65yo increase, these countries have the burdens of an ageing population started to further impact available healthcare systems. In recent years the level of demand has grown, at a much faster pace [14]. This impact has contributed to the global nursing staff shortage crisis because old people have higher healthcare dependency on healthcare professionals, especially nursing staff. Studies in individual healthcare facility settings or at community levels have reported that nursing shortages are a chronic issue [15], and this was highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic period [16].

The challenge for health authorities is to take strategic actions to provide sufficient healthcare to an older population with high demand of nursing care. This study helps to illustrate and quantify the role of nursing workforce in increasing the proportion of people over 65 years old. In this study, we hypothesized that, globally, nursing healthcare services may be a significant contributor for increasing the portion of people to live over 65 years. We tested this hypothesis by examining the statistical relationship between nurse density and the 65yo%, globally and regionally. With reference to previous studies into healthcare outcomes of nursing staff, economic affluence, obesity prevalence, physician density, total fertility rate and urbanization were incorporated as potential confounding factors.

Materials and methods

Data sources

The country specific data published by the agencies of the United Nations (UN) were extracted for this ecological study. Country in this study does not necessarily indicate political independence but only refers to the geographic territory or region which reported data on health, demography and economic situation to the World Bank [17]. Except for the obesity prevalence rate which was extracted from the World Health Organization [18], all other variables (nurse density, population ageing level, GDP PPP, physician density, total fertility rate and urbanization) were downloaded from the World Bank database [19].

  • 1. The dependent variable, population ageing level indexed with the percentage of population aged 65 and above (65yo%) in 2020 [20].

The DataBank of the World Bank is an analysis and visualisation tool that contains collections of time series data on a variety of topics, including socioeconomics, key health, nutrition and demography statistics. Population is based on the de facto definition of population, which counts all residents regardless of legal residency status or citizenship.

  • 2. The independent variable, nurse density measured with the number of nurses and midwives per 1,000 people [21].

To reduce random errors at the time of data collection, we averaged the number of nurses and midwives for the period between 2014 and 2018 in each country for our data analyses.

Empirically and as per recent studies, economic affluence, obesity, physician service access, total fertility rate and urban living have been either positive or negatively associated with people’s health affecting their opportunities surviving 65 years old. Therefore, they were included as the potential confounders while we analysed the independent role of nursing workforce in promoting population ageing:

  • 3. Economic affluence, expressed with the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita [22].

The economic affluence is specifically indexed as GDP PPP per capita (current international $ for purchasing power parity) in 2014. GDP PPP is included as the index of economic affluence in this study as it has the advantage over GDP per capita because it considers the relative cost of local goods, services and inflation rates of the country. Therefore, GDP PPP is more associated with the life quality and wellbeing of individuals who live in different countries [7, 23, 24].

  • 4. Obesity prevalence rate, measured with the percentage of adult individuals with the body mass index (BMI) equal to or exceeding 30 kg/m2 in 2014 [18].

Obesity is a result of metabolic imbalances which increases the risk for obese individuals to develop medical complications and die younger than 65 years old [25].

  • 5. Physician density, expressed with the number of physicians per 1,000 people [26].

Physician healthcare access determines not only the level of primary healthcare services, but also the diagnosis and treatment of patients’ health conditions at the secondary and tertiary levels. Therefore, physician and nursing healthcare services may be seen to confound with each other for maintaining and improving people’s health to facilitate them to survive 65 years old [27].

  • 6. Fertility rate (total), representing the total number of children born to a woman [28].

It is reasonable to note that falling fertility rates are one of the major determinants of population aging [36]. Low fertility rates result in smaller youth cohorts, which creates an imbalance in the demographic structure: older age groups expand and become more populous than their younger counterparts [29].

  • 7. Urbanization, indexed with the percentage of total population living in urban areas in 2014 [30].

Urbanization represents a major demographic shift which is characterised by lifestyle changes, for instance lack of physical activity and poor diet patterns [3133]. Studies controversially showed that people living in both metropolitan areas and rural areas have greater life expectancy and higher percentage to survive 65 years old. However, urban residents experience relatively larger gains in life expectancy than those in rural areas [34].

The relevant United Nations agencies offer free online access to data required for the analyses such as in this study. The data can only be identifiable to the level of population. They are not identifiable or re-identifiable to the individual participant, their family or community. Therefore, there is no need to obtain ethical approval or consent during the entire study process.

Data selection

We extracted the country specific data on independent variable (nurse density), dependent variable (population ageing level) and 5 potential confounders (GDP PPP, obesity prevalence, physician density, total fertility rate and urbanization). For each variable, we extracted the data from all the countries where data were available from the websites of the United Nation agencies.

Following the country list created by the World Bank, we aligned all the 7 variables from the individual countries and obtained a full set of data comprising 215 countries. Each country was treated as an individual study subject in all the data analysis models. However, not all the countries (subjects) have all the information for all the variables. The numbers of countries/ subjects (sample size) included for analysing the correlations to other variables may differ as such.

Data analysis

To assess the correlation between the nurse density and the 65yo%, the analysis proceeded in the following 5 models [27, 3538]:

  • 1) Scatter plots were explored with the raw data in Microsoft Excel® for examining and visualizing the strength, shape and direction of correlation of nurse density to 65yo%. Additionally, the scatter plots graph allowed an examination of data quality, for example, if there are any unexpected gaps in the data and if there are any extreme outlier points.

    To reduce the skewness of our original data for valid statistical analysis results produced in the following data analysis models, all the 7 variables were log-transformed.

  • 2. Bivariate (Pearson’s r and nonparametric) correlations were conducted to examine the directions and strengths of the correlations between all the variables.

  • 3. Partial correlation of Pearson’s moment-product approach was performed to identify the independent correlation relationships between variables. We alternated each of the 6 variables (nurse density, GDP PPP, obesity, physician density, total fertility rate and urbanization) as the independent predictor when all the other 5 variables are included as the potential confounding factors. And then, we alternated each individual variable as the controlled variable to assess the relationship between 65yo% and each of the 5 variables.

  • 4. Standard multiple linear regression (enter) was performed to describe the correlations between the dependent variable (65yo%) and the predicting variables. To explore if and how much nurse density could statistically explain the individual relationships between nurse density and GDP PPP, obesity, physician density, total fertility rate and urbanization, the enter multiple linear regression was performed to calculate the correlations between nurse density and the confounding variables when nurse density is “added” and “not added” as a predicting variable respectively.

    Subsequently, standard multiple linear regression (stepwise) is performed to select the most significant predicting variable(s) for 65yo% when nurse density was “added” and “not added” as a predicting variable respectively.

  • 5. The universal correlations between nurse density and 65yo% were explored and compared in different country groupings:
    • 1) the World Bank income classifications: high income, upper middle income, low-middle income and low income;
    • 2) the UN common practice on defining the developed and developing countries [39];
      Fisher’s r-to-z transformation was applied to compare the nurse density- 65yo% correlations in the developed countries and the developing countries.
    • 3) the WHO regional classifications: Africa (AFR), Americas (AMR), Eastern Mediterranean (EMR), Europe (EU), South-East Asia (SEAR) and Western Pacific (WPR) [40];
    • 4) countries with the strong contrast in terms of geographic distributions, per capita GDP levels and/or cultural backgrounds. We analysed the correlation in the 6 country groupings: Asia Cooperation Dialogue (ACD) [41]; the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC); the Arab World [42], European Economic Area (EEA) [43], countries with English as the official language (government websites), European Union (EU) [44], Latin America [45], Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) [45], the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and non-OECD group [46].

Bivariate correlations, partial correlation, multiple linear regression analyses (enter and stepwise) were conducted with SPSS v. 28. The significance is kept at the 0.05 level, but 0.01 and 0.001 levels ae also reported. Standard multiple linear regression analysis criteria are set at probability of F to enter ≤ 0.05 and probability of F to remove ≥ 0.10.

Results

The relationship identified in the scatterplots between nurse density and population ageing was a strong correlation (R2 = 0.5268 (r = 0.7258), p<0.001, n = 177, Fig 1). The nursing workforce explains 52.68% of population ageing variance.

Fig 1. The relationship between nurse density and population ageing level.

Fig 1

This strong relationship between nurse density and population ageing identified in the scatterplots was confirmed by the subsequent bivariate correlation analyses with the log-transformed data.

Globally, nurse density significantly correlated to 65yo% (r = 0.694 and rho = 0.724, p<0.001 respectively in Pearson and non-parametric analyses, Table 1).

Table 1. Pearson (above diagonal) & non-parametric (below diagonal) correlation matrix for all variables.

Nurse density Population ageing GDP PPP Obesity prevalence Physician density Total fertility rate Urbanization
Nurse density 1 0.694*** 0.774*** 0.508*** 0.784*** -0.735*** 0.547***
Population ageing 0.724*** 1 0.671*** 0.365*** 0.759*** -0.852*** 0.494***
GDP PPP 0.797*** 0.686*** 1 0.502*** 0.839*** -0.799*** 0.720***
Obesity prevalence 0.465*** 0.365*** 0.483*** 1 0.500*** -0.391*** 0.546***
Physician density 0.810*** 0.810*** 0.831*** 0.445*** 1 -0.841*** 0.626***
Total fertility rate -0.745*** -0.872*** -0.777*** -0.352*** -0.816*** 1 -0.521***
Urbanization 0.600*** 0.506*** 0.757*** 0.584*** 0.630*** -0.522*** 1

Significance level:

***p˂ 0.001; n ranges between 176 and 212.

Data source and definition: Nurse density, expressed with the number of nurses and midwives per 1,000 population (the Word Bank); Population ageing, presented with the percent of population aged 65 and above (the Word Bank); GDP PPP, the per capita purchasing power parity (PPP) value of all final goods and services produced within a territory in a given year (the Word Bank); Obesity prevalence, the percentage of population with BMI ≥30 prevalence (WHO Global Health Observatory); Physician availability, the number of nurses and midwives per 1,000 population (the Word Bank); Total fertility rate, representing the number of children that are born to a woman, the World Bank; Urbanization, the percentage of population living in urban area (the Word Bank);

All the data were log-transformed for correlation analysis.

When predicting and confounding variables (nurse density, GDP PPP, obesity, total fertility rate, physician density and urbanization) were individually correlated to population ageing, while keeping the other 5 variables statistically constant, nurse density, GDP PPP and total fertility rate remained significant correlations to 65yo% (r = 0.194, p< 0.05; r = 0.223, p< 0.01 and r = 0.609, p < 0.001 respectively, Table 2-1). Neither obesity prevalence nor urbanization showed an independent correlation to 65yo% while the other 5 variables were kept statistically constant (Table 2-1).

Table 2. Partial correlation coefficients between population ageing and nurse density with individual and different combinations of controlled variables.

Variables Table 2–1: Nurse density, GDP PPP, obesity prevalence, physician density, total fertility rate and urbanization were alternated as the predicting variable for calculating its relationship with population ageing level while the other 4 variables were kept statistically constant.
Population ageing (65yo%) Population ageing (65yo%) Population ageing (65yo%) Population ageing (65yo%) Population ageing (65yo%) Population ageing (65yo%)
r p r p r p r p r p r p
Nurse density 0.194 <0.050 - - - - - - - - - -
GDP PPP - - -0.223 <0.010 - - - - - - - -
Obesity prevalence - - - - -0.038 0.626 - - - - - -
Physician density - - - - - - 0.119 0.120 - - - -
Total fertility rate - - - - - - - - -0.609 ˂ 0.001 - -
Urbanization - - - - - - - - - - 0.147 0.055
Variables Table 2–2: Nurse density, GDP PPP, obesity prevalence, physician density, total fertility rate and urbanization were alternated as the individual potential confounder for exploring the partial correlations between population ageing level and the other 4 independent/confounding variables.
Population ageing (65yo%) Population ageing (65yo%) Population ageing (65yo%) Population ageing (65yo%) Population ageing (65yo%) Population ageing (65yo%)
r p r p r p r p r p r p
Nurse density - - 0.371 ˂ 0.001 0.634 ˂ 0.001 0.243 ˂ 0.001 0.189 < 0.010 0.582 ˂ 0.001
GDP PPP 0.295 ˂ 0.001 - - 0.606 ˂ 0.001 0.097 0.196 -0.031 0.683 0.523 ˂ 0.001
Obesity prevalence 0.020 0.793 0.043 0.569 - - -0.027 0.720 0.064 0.394 0.130 0.084
Physician density 0.482 ˂ 0.001 0.487 ˂ 0.001 0.716 ˂ 0.001 - - 0.150 0.043 0.664 ˂ 0.001
Total fertility rate -0.701 ˂ 0.001 -0.709 ˂ 0.001 -0.828 ˂ 0.001 -0.607 ˂ 0.001 - - -0.802 ˂ 0.001
Urbanization 0.190 < 0.010 0.021 0.782 0.378 ˂ 0.001 0.036 0.629 0.111 0.129 - -

- Controlled variable; Table 2–1 df = 169; Table 2–2 df range: 173 to 188

Data source and definition Data source and definition: Nurse density, expressed with the number of nurses and midwives per 1,000 population (the Word Bank); Population ageing, presented with the percent of population aged 65 and above (the Word Bank); GDP PPP, the per capita purchasing power parity (PPP) value of all final goods and services produced within a territory in a given year (the Word Bank); Obesity prevalence, the percentage of population with BMI ≥30 prevalence (WHO Global Health Observatory); Physician availability, the number of nurses and midwives per 1,000 population (the Word Bank); Total fertility rate, representing the number of children that are born to a woman, the World Bank; Urbanization, the percentage of population living in urban area (the Word Bank);

All the data were log-transformed for correlation analysis.

Moreover, nurse density was in constant and significant correlation to 65yo% when GDP PPP, obesity prevalence, total fertility rate, physician density and urbanization were individually controlled (r = 0.371, p< 0.001; r = 0.634, p< 0.001; r = 0.243, p< 0.001; r = 0.189, p< 0.01 and r = 0.582, p< 0.001 respectively, Table 2-2).

These partial correlation analysis results suggest that, statistically, the individual, or the combined confounding effects of GDP PPP, obesity prevalence, total fertility rate, physician density and urbanization did not affect the significant relationship of nurse density to people increasing over 65yo%.

Standard multiple linear regression (enter) analysis was applied to further predict 65yo% when nurse density, GDP PPP, obesity, physician density and urbanization were considered as the predicting variables. When nurse density was “not added” as one of the predicting variables, physician density and total fertility rate were in significant correlations to 65yo% (β = 0.230, p<0.01 and β = -0.770, p<0.001 respectively). GDP PPP, obesity prevalence and urbanization showed weak and insignificant correlations to 65yo% (Table 3-1). When nurse density was “added” as a predicting variable, it showed its significant contribution to 65yo% together with total fertility rate (β = 0.178, p<0.010; β = -0.239, p<0.010; β = -0.749, p< 0.001, Table 3-1). Obesity prevalence, physician density and urbanization showed very weak and insignificant relationship to 65yo% (Table 3-1).

Table 3. Multiple linear regression results to show predicting effects of independent variables and identify the significant predictors of population ageing level.

Enter
Population ageing (65yo%)
Nurse density (not added) Nurse density (added)
Variable Beta Significance Beta Significance
Nurse density Not added 0.178 < 0.050
GDP PPP -0.105 0.065 -0.239 < 0.010
Obesity prevalence 0.029 0.563 0.008 0.874
Physician density 0.230 < 0.010 0.166 0.069
Total fertility rate -0.770 < 0.001 -0.749 < 0.001
Urbanization 0.011 0.857 0.032 0.607

Significance level:

* p<0.05;

** p˂ 0.01;

***p˂ 0.001

Data source and definition Data source and definition: Nurse density, expressed with the number of nurses and midwives per 1,000 population (the Word Bank); Population ageing, presented with the percent of population aged 65 and above (the Word Bank); GDP PPP, the per capita purchasing power parity (PPP) value of all final goods and services produced within a territory in a given year (the Word Bank); Obesity prevalence, the percentage of population with BMI ≥30 prevalence (WHO Global Health Observatory); Physician availability, the number of nurses and midwives per 1,000 population (the Word Bank); Total fertility rate, representing the number of children that are born to a woman, the World Bank; Urbanization, the percentage of population living in urban area (the Word Bank);

All the data were log-transformed for correlation analysis.

Similarly, in the subsequent stepwise linear regression model, when nurse density was “not added” as one of the predictors, total fertility rate and physician density were selected as the two most significant variables which totally explained 72.9% (R2 = 0.729, Table 3-2) of 65yo% variance. While nurse density was “added” as a predicting variable, the stepwise linear regression model selected nurse density as the 2nd most influential predictor for 65yo% with (R2 increment = 0.010, Table 3-2). In the stepwise regression analysis model, totally, 74.1% (R2 = 0.741) of 65yo% variance was explained by the 4 selected significant predicting and potential confounding variables (total fertility rate, nurse density, GDPP PPP and physician density, Table 3-2).

Table 4 showed the relationship between nurse density and 65yo% in different country groupings. The best fit equations and R square extracted from the scatt plots consisting of nurse density and 65yo% showed that nurse density universally correlated to 65yo% in all country groupings. The highlights of the results were the relationships between nurse density and 65yo% in United Nations developed and developing countries (R2 = 0.722 and 0.248 respectively, Table 4). Fisher’s r to z transformation revealed that nurse density had the significantly more important role in promoting 65yo% in developed countries than in the developing countries (z = 4.02, p< 0.001, Table 4).

Table 4. Bivariate correlations between nurse density and population ageing level within various country groupings.

Country grouping Best fit equation R2 Trendline pattern Fisher’s r-to-z transformation
UN common practice
 Developed y = -0.4141x2 + 1.7808x + 1.0889 R2 = 0.722, n = 45 Polynomial Developed vs developing countries:
z = 4.02, p< 0.001
 Developing y = 0.0167x2 + 0.0891x + 0.6085 R2 = 0.248, n = 141 Polynomial
World Bank income classifications
 Low y = 0.0814x2 - 0.6136x + 2.1834 R2 = 0.2908 Polynomial
 Low middle y = -0.0249x2 + 0.5036x - 0.4412 R2 = 0.1924 Polynomial
 Upper middle y = 0.0381x2 - 0.1774x + 1.7187 R2 = 0.1819 Polynomial
 High y = -0.1445x2 + 2.5845x - 8.3844 R2 = 0.1590 Polynomial
WHO Regions
 AFRO y = 0.1026x2 - 0.815x + 2.6237 R2 = 0.4013 Polynomial
 AMRO y = 0.0176x2 + 0.0354x + 1.3525 R2 = 0.4841 Polynomial
 EMRO y = -0.167x2 + 1.6365x - 2.4014 R2 = 0.3026 Polynomial
 EURO y = -0.1331x2 + 0.8006x + 1.6858 R2 = 0.0552 Polynomial
 SEARO y = -0.1309x2 + 1.4553x - 2.083 R2 = 0.1015 Polynomial
 WPRO y = 0.18x2 - 1.634x + 5.0363 R2 = 0.6539 Polynomial
Countries grouped based on various factors
 ACD y = 0.6558ln(x) + 0.583 R2 = 0.0359 Logarithmic
 APEC y = 0.6242e0.2021x R2 = 0.6200 Exponential
 Arab World y = -0.143x2 + 1.408x - 1.93 R2 = 0.2206 Polynomial
 EEA y = -0.2023x2 + 0.957x + 1.8014 R2 = 0.3603 Polynomial
 EOL y = 0.1063x2 - 0.7988x + 2.4714 R2 = 0.5424 Polynomial
 EU y = -0.1635x2 + 0.6147x + 2.4294 R2 = 0.0776 Polynomial
 LA y = 0.0263x2 - 0.0409x + 1.4964 R2 = 0.6468 Polynomial
 LAC y = 0.0031x2 + 0.1594x + 1.1142 R2 = 0.4057 Polynomial
 OECD y = -0.2023x2 + 0.957x + 1.8014 R2 = 0.3603 Polynomial
 SADC y = 0.1063x2 - 0.7988x + 2.4714 R2 = 0.5424 Polynomial

Data source and definition: Nurse density, measured with the number of nurses and midwives per 1,000 population (the Word Bank); Population ageing, presented with the percent of population aged 65 and above (the Word Bank).

All the data were log-transformed for correlation analysis.

Discussion

This ecological study examined the correlation between nursing density and population ageing (65yo%) with consideration of the confounding effects of economic affluence (GDP PPP), obesity prevalence, physician density, total fertility rate and urbanization. The findings in this study reveal that nurse density may be a significant contributor to population ageing, and this contributing effect remains independent of economic affluence (GDP PPP), total fertility rate, obesity, physician density and urbanization.

It is well-known that, as the biggest healthcare professional group [10], nurses are essential to primary, secondary and tertiary health care. This is evident in the intrinsic correlation between nurse density and improvements to life expectancies at birth and 65 years of age, old within OECD countries [13] and worldwide [12].

The impact of nursing has been seen in many domains of health such as management of infectious diseases, a significant contributor to reduced life expectancy. As healthcare professionals in constant communication with patients and their needs nurses have led and manage infection control services across acute and community settings, effectively interrupting disease transmission on multiple levels of population and social status [47, 48]. As the frontline healthcare professional, nurses have been playing a crucial role in preventing COVID- 19 from spreading and treating COVID-19 patients [49, 50]. Nursing interventions have been reducing infectious disease mortality rates across the whole population, including the segment aged 65 and over [51].

High child mortality rates and the ongoing impact of an infectious disease pandemic are significant obstacles for people to survive to 65 years of age. Globally, nurses have been playing a pivotal role in reducing child mortality rate through heavy involvement in communicable and non-communicable disease management [11, 52, 53]. Thompson and Keeling report that over 40 years, improvements in child mortality have occurred through nurses educating and assisting young mothers on how to feed their children and how to maintain hygiene [52].

Patient education and public health promotion are critical components of the nurses’ daily job, which may be even more important concerns for the older population because of the second epidemiology transition [54]. This transition, marked by a rapidly growing public health crisis concerning a shift from infectious diseases to the impact of chronic diseases is a consequence of good nursing care. This has been evidenced in the role of the nursing workforce in contributing to life expectancy both at younger age and then older than 65 across epidemics, acute health conditions [12, 13] and a range of degenerative diseases which occur in older populations [13]. In terms of approach, both studies also correlated nurse density to life expectancy at population level, similar to those revealed in this study.

Nurses are central to full coverage healthcare services, they are often the first and sometimes the only health professionals that patients see [10]. The quality of healthcare received from nurses has been associated with patient safety [5560], low mortality rate [6166] and patient outcomes [55, 59, 6770]. While the breadth of the impact of nurses on people’s health remains difficult to fully quantify, the community recognition of nursing healthcare services occurs through various awards, for example, the International Year of the Nurse and the Midwife [71] and the Gallup Roll [72].

Strengths and limitations

The greatest strength of this study is free and unrestricted access to the predicting variable (nurse density) and dependent variable (65yo%) which was complimented with data concerning potential confounding variables (GDP PPP, obesity prevalence, total fertility rate and urbanization). The time based serial data enabled both predicting and confounding variables to observe their delayed presentations and impact on 65yo%. This enabled data analysis using several different models, such as scatterplots, bivariate, partial correlation and linear regression. This level of data availability and subsequent multiple data analysis approaches provide a rich source of findings when compared to individual based studies.

Some limitations to be noted:

  • Firstly, this is an ecological study, and the results are subject to ecological fallacy. The correlations identified in this study are at population level, but they may not necessarily hold true at the individual level.

  • Secondly, this is a cross sectional study, the relationship between nurse density and 65yo% is only correlational, not causal.

  • Thirdly, the data included in this study may be crude and have some random errors when the United Nations agencies collected and aggregated data at population level. However, the analysis results are highly repeatable which may be different from individual data based studies.

Implications for practice

This study delivers a strong message to health authorities worldwide. As populations age 65 and over increase, the prevalence of disability, frailty and chronic diseases also rises [14, 73, 74]. With the increasing percentage of the world population aged 65+, the pressure for nursing care becomes cumulative, essentially exacerbating the challenges of a shortage of nursing staff. This study should encourage healthcare authorities, to consider the implications increase of density when promoting population health.

Conclusions

Nurse density correlates to population ageing globally and regionally, but is more strongly in developed countries. This suggests that nurse density may be a significant predictor for population ageing, and is more prominent in developed countries. Ironically, nursing healthcare has been partially responsible for population ageing which in turn demands more nursing care and accordingly exposes the nursing profession to a worsening shortage of staff. To highlight the profound implications for the role the nursing profession plays especially at a time of global nursing shortage, further study into the effects of long-run elasticity of nurse staffing level on population ageing may be needed. For instance, what percentage of increase of nursing staff would be required to meet every 1% increase of an ageing population.

Data Availability

All relevant data sources are described within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.United Nations. Ageing Official website: United Nations; 2022. https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/ageing.
  • 2.OCED Data. Demography- Elderly population: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2022 [November 12 2022]. https://data.oecd.org/pop/elderly-population.htm.
  • 3.Lee R, Mason A, network N, Lee R, Mason A, Amporfu E, et al. Is low fertility really a problem? Population aging, dependency, and consumption. Science. 2014;346(6206):229–34. doi: 10.1126/science.1250542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Fertility and ageing. Human reproduction update. 2005;11(3):261–76. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cheng X, Yang Y, Schwebel DC, Liu Z, Li L, Cheng P, et al. Population ageing and mortality during 1990–2017: a global decomposition analysis. PLoS medicine. 2020;17(6):e1003138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Harper S. Living longer within ageing societies. Journal of Population Ageing. 2019;12(2):133–6. doi: 10.1007/s12062-019-09248-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marmot MG, Smith GD. Why are the Japanese living longer? BMJ: British Medical Journal. 1989;299(6715):1547. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6715.1547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hummer RA, Hernandez EM. The effect of educational attainment on adult mortality in the United States. Population bulletin. 2013;68(1):1–16. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4435622/.. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Timmers PR, Wilson JF, Joshi PK, Deelen J. Multivariate genomic scan implicates novel loci and haem metabolism in human ageing. Nature communications. 2020;11(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17312-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.WHO. Nursing and midwifery Internet The World Health Organization; 2020 [January 8 2022]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/nursing-and-midwifery.
  • 11.Amiri A, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Solankallio-Vahteri T, Tuomi S. Impact of nurse staffing on reducing infant, neonatal and perinatal mortality rates: Evidence from panel data analysis in 35 OECD countries. International journal of nursing sciences. 2020;7(2):161–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.02.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.You W, Donnelly F. Although in shortage, nursing workforce is still a significant contributor to life expectancy at birth. Public Health Nursing. 2022. doi: 10.1111/phn.13158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Amiri A, Solankallio-Vahteri T. Nurse staffing and life expectancy at birth and at 65 years old: evidence from 35 OECD countries. International journal of nursing sciences. 2019;6(4):362–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.WHO. Ageing and health: The World Health Orgnization 2022 [18 December 2022]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health.
  • 15.Tamata AT, Mohammadnezhad M. A systematic review study on the factors affecting shortage of nursing workforce in the hospitals. Nursing open. 2023;10(3):1247–57. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xu H, Intrator O, Bowblis JR. Shortages of staff in nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic: what are the driving factors? Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2020;21(10):1371–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.The World Bank. How does the World Bank classify countries?: The World Bank; 2022 [December 24 2022]. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/378834-how-does-the-world-bank-classify-countries.
  • 18.WHO. GHO | By category | Obesity (body mass index ≥ 30), age-standardized (%)—Estimates by country: World Health Organization; 2017 [updated MINERVA PUBLISH DATE28 August 2017]. http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.CTRY2450A.
  • 19.The World Bank. DataBank Official website2022 [May 18 2022]. https://databank.worldbank.org/home.aspx.
  • 20.The world Bank. Population ages 65 and above (% of total population) Officiel website: The World Bank; 2020 [cited 2022 16 May 2022]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS.
  • 21.World Bank. Nurses and midwives (per 1,000 people) DataBank: the World Bank Group; 2022 [January 18 2022]. from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.MED.NUMW.P3.
  • 22.World Bank. GDP per capita, PPP (current international $) Internet2019 [December 28 2021]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD.
  • 23.Becker GS, Philipson TJ, Soares RR. The quantity and quality of life and the evolution of world inequality. American economic review. 2005;95(1):277–91. doi: 10.1257/0002828053828563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Deaton A. Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic perspectives. 2008;22(2):53–72. doi: 10.1257/jep.22.2.53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Peeters A, Barendregt JJ, Willekens F, Mackenbach JP, Al Mamun A, Bonneux L. Obesity in adulthood and its consequences for life expectancy: a life-table analysis. Annals of internal medicine. 2003;138(1):24–32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.World Bank. Physicians (per 1,000 people) Online: The World Bank; 2020 [April 3 2022]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.MED.PHYS.ZS.
  • 27.You W, Donnelly F. Physician care access plays a significant role in extending global and regional life expectancy. European Journal of Internal Medicine. 2022;(103):62–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.The world Bank. Fertility rate, total (births per woman) Official website: The World Bank; 2015 [16 May 2022]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN.
  • 29.Guseh JS. Aging of the World’s Population. Encyclopedia of Family Studies. 2016:1–5. doi: 10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs352 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.World Bank. Urban population (% of total population) Official Website: The World Bank Group; 2022 [January 18 2022]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS.
  • 31.Allender S, Foster C, Hutchinson L, Arambepola C. Quantification of urbanization in relation to chronic diseases in developing countries: a systematic review. Journal of urban health: bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 2008;85(6):938–51. Epub 2008/10/22. doi: 10.1007/s11524-008-9325-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moore M, Gould P, Keary BS. Global urbanization and impact on health. International journal of hygiene and environmental health. 2003;206(4):269–78. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.WHO. Urban health WHO Official Website: World Health Organization; 2022 [March 12 2022]. https://www.who.int/health-topics/urban-health#tab=tab_1.
  • 34.Singh GK, Siahpush M. Widening rural–urban disparities in life expectancy, US, 1969–2009. American journal of preventive medicine. 2014;46(2):e19–e29. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.You W, Henneberg R, Coventry BJ, Henneberg M. Cutaneous malignant melanoma incidence is strongly associated with European depigmented skin type regardless of ambient ultraviolet radiation levels: evidence from Worldwide population-based data. AIMS Public Health. 2022;9(2):378. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2022026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.You W, Henneberg R, Henneberg M. Healthcare services relaxing natural selection may contribute to increase of dementia incidence. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12678-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.You W, Rühli F, Eppenberger P, Galassi FM, Diao P, Henneberg M. Gluten consumption may contribute to worldwide obesity prevalence. Anthropological Review. 2020;83(3):327–48. doi: http%3A//dx.doi.org/10.2478/anre-2020-0023 [Google Scholar]
  • 38.You W, Henneberg M. Large household reduces dementia mortality: A cross-sectional data analysis of 183 populations. PloS one. 2022;17(3):e0263309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.United Nations Statistics Division. Composition of macro geographical (continental) regions, geographical sub-regions, and selected economic and other groupings: United Nations; 2013 [03.10.2022]. http://unstats.un.org
  • 40.WHO. WHO regional offices: The World Health Orgnization 2018 [November 26.2022]. http://www.who.int.
  • 41.Asia Cooperation Dialogue. Member Countries 2018. http://www.acddialogue.com.
  • 42.The World Bank. Arab World | Data: The World Bank; 2015. http://data.worldbank.org/region/ARB.
  • 43.European Free Trade Association. What is the European Economic Area? 2022. http://www.efta.int/eea.
  • 44.European Union. EUROPA—Countries 2022 [18.06.2015]. http://europa.eu.
  • 45.The United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. UNESCO Regions-Latin America and the Caribbean 2022 [11.26.2015]. http://www.unesco.org.
  • 46.OECD. List of OECD Member countries 2015. http://www.oecd.org.
  • 47.You W, Galassi FM, Varotto E, Henneberg M. Genghis Khan’s death (AD 1227): An unsolvable riddle or simply a pandemic disease? International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2021;104:347–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.12.089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lam SKK, Kwong EWY, Hung MSY, Chien WT. Emergency nurses’ perceptions regarding the risks appraisal of the threat of the emerging infectious disease situation in emergency departments. International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being. 2020;15(1):1718468. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2020.1718468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Al Thobaity A, Alshammari F. Nurses on the frontline against the COVID-19 pandemic: an integrative review. Dubai Medical Journal. 2020;3(3):87–92. doi: 10.1159/000509361 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fawaz M, Anshasi H, Samaha A. Nurses at the front line of COVID-19: Roles, responsibilities, risks, and rights. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2020;103(4):1341. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Stirling B, Littlejohn P, Willbond ML. Nurses and the Control of Infectious Disease. Understanding epidemiology and disease transmission is vital to nursing care. Canadian Nurse. 2004;100(9):16–20.. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Thompson ME, Keeling AA. Nurses’ Role in the Prevention of Infant Mortality in 1884–1925: Health Disparities Then and Now. Journal of pediatric nursing. 2012;27(5):471–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2011.05.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Amiri A. Role of nurses and midwives in improving patient safety during childbirth: evidence from obstetric trauma in OECD countries. Applied Nursing Research. 2020;56:151343. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.McKeown RE. The Epidemiologic Transition: Changing Patterns of Mortality and Population Dynamics. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2009;3(1 Suppl):19S–26S. Epub 2010/02/18. doi: 10.1177/1559827609335350 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Aiken LH, Sermeus W, Van den Heede K, Sloane DM, Busse R, McKee M, et al. Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United States. BMJ. 2012;344(e1717). doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hughes RG. Chapter 44 Tools and strategies for quality improvement and patient safety. Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). 2008. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2682/. [PubMed]
  • 57.Wu Y, Fujita S, Seto K, Ito S, Matsumoto K, Huang C-C, et al. The impact of nurse working hours on patient safety culture: a cross-national survey including Japan, the United States and Chinese Taiwan using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. BMC health services research. 2013;13(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ausserhofer D, Zander B, Busse R, Schubert M, De Geest S, Rafferty AM, et al. Prevalence, patterns and predictors of nursing care left undone in European hospitals: results from the multicountry cross-sectional RN4CAST study. BMJ quality & safety. 2014;23(2):126–35. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cho E, Lee N-J, Kim E-Y, Kim S, Lee K, Park K-O, et al. Nurse staffing level and overtime associated with patient safety, quality of care, and care left undone in hospitals: a cross-sectional study. International journal of nursing studies. 2016;60:263–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Amiri A, Solankallio-Vahteri T, Tuomi S. Role of nurses in improving patient safety: evidence from surgical complications in 21 countries. International journal of nursing sciences. 2019;6(3):239–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski J, Silber JH. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. Jama. 2002;288(16):1987–93. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.16.1987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Aiken LH, Cimiotti JP, Sloane DM, Smith HL, Flynn L, Neff DF. Effects of nurse staffing and nurse education on patient deaths in hospitals with different nurse work environments. The Journal of nursing administration. 2012;42(10 Suppl):S10. doi: 10.1097/01.NNA.0000420390.87789.67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Estabrooks CA, Midodzi WK, Cummings GG, Ricker KL, Giovannetti P. The impact of hospital nursing characteristics on 30-day mortality. Nursing research. 2005;54(2):74–84. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200503000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Van den Heede K, Lesaffre E, Diya L, Vleugels A, Clarke SP, Aiken LH, et al. The relationship between inpatient cardiac surgery mortality and nurse numbers and educational level: analysis of administrative data. International journal of nursing studies. 2009;46(6):796–803. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.12.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cho E, Sloane DM, Kim E-Y, Kim S, Choi M, Yoo IY, et al. Effects of nurse staffing, work environments, and education on patient mortality: an observational study. International journal of nursing studies. 2015;52(2):535–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.08.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Manojlovich M. Increasing nurse staffing levels and a higher proportion with bachelor’s degrees could decrease patient mortality risk. Evidence-based nursing. 2015;18(2):62-. doi: 10.1136/eb-2014-101913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Oliver GM, Pennington L, Revelle S, Rantz M. Impact of nurse practitioners on health outcomes of Medicare and Medicaid patients. Nursing Outlook. 2014;62(6):440–7. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Aiken LH, Cerón C, Simonetti M, Lake ET, Galiano A, Garbarini A, et al. Hospital nurse staffing and patient outcomes. Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes. 2018;29(3):322–7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmclc.2018.04.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rafferty AM, Clarke SP, Coles J, Ball J, James P, McKee M, et al. Outcomes of variation in hospital nurse staffing in English hospitals: cross-sectional analysis of survey data and discharge records. International journal of nursing studies. 2007;44(2):175–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Suhonen R, Papastavrou E, Efstathiou G, Tsangari H, Jarosova D, Leino‐Kilpi H, et al. Patient satisfaction as an outcome of individualised nursing care. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences. 2012;26(2):372–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00943.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.WHO. Year of the Nurse and the Midwife 2020 [28 June 2022]. https://www.who.int/campaigns/annual-theme/year-of-the-nurse-and-the-midwife-2020.
  • 72.Oakland University. Gallup Poll finds nursing is most honest, ethical profession Internet: Oakland University; 2021. https://oakland.edu/oumagazine/news/nursing/2021/gallup-poll-finds-nursing-is-most-honest-ethical-profession.
  • 73.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Feather Article 2014 [18 December 2022]. https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/19dbc591-b1ef-4485-80ce-029ff66d6930/6_9-health-ageing.pdf.aspx.
  • 74.National Academy of Sciences. Retooling for an Aging America: Building the Health Care Workforce. In: Americans. IoMUCotFHCWfO, editor. 2 Health Status and Health Care Service Utilization. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2008. [PubMed]

Decision Letter 0

Alice Mannocci

27 Feb 2023

PONE-D-22-35617Greater nurse density correlates to higher level of population ageing globally, but is more prominent in developed countries.PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. You,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 13 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Alice Mannocci, Ph.D, MS

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. The study presents the results of original research.

2. Results reported have not been published elsewhere.

3. Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail.

4. Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data.

5. The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English.

6. The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity.

7. The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability.

Reviewer #2: your Introduction part is shallow and needs great attention and modification, your method part needs grammer correction and you should devoite your time again on this part, the reason for your log transformation is not clear

Reviewer #3: After analyzing the article, the following changes need to be made.

1. Please check the grammar and writing of the whole text. If the background section,greater nurse density correlates to higher levels of population ageing for those aged 65 or over. Methods:Population level data was extracted for exploring the correlation between nurse density and population 。

2.The results section of the abstract .nursing density has the second greatest influence on population ageing. Can care density affect population aging? Or does the order of words need to be switched.

3. Introduction :We support this hypothesis through calculating the correlation between nursing healthcare level and prevalence of older people (percentage of people aged 65 or above). Is it inconsistent with what is expressed in the title?

4. The r and R of the result section Figure 2-2 need to be unified.

5. Total fertility rate and urbanization show very weak and insignificant correlations to population ageing level (Table 3). I assume it should be total fertility rate and Physician density rather than urbanization.

6. The discussion is too complicated, so we can go straight to the topic and analyze the result part in depth, and many contents of the text are not very relevant.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Worku Chekol Tassew

Reviewer #3: Yes: HuiTan

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewer Attachments.docx

PLoS One. 2023 Sep 29;18(9):e0292371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292371.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


14 Mar 2023

Please see our response to the reviewers' comments in the separate Word document, titled 0 Response to Review Decision.

It has been uploaded.

Attachment

Submitted filename: 0 Response to Review Decision.docx

Decision Letter 1

Alice Mannocci

5 Apr 2023

PONE-D-22-35617R1

Greater nurse density correlates to higher level of population ageing globally, but is more prominent in developed countries.

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. You,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 20 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Alice Mannocci, Ph.D, MS

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: You have tried to incorporate reviewer’s comments. It assure the ethical principles and follow publication ethics

Reviewer #3: The discussion section is not profound, can a brief sentence summarize this study?

The model can only be used as a reference. Is there any other literature to support care density effect population aging?

The main results of the conclusion section need to be written out

The conclusion drawn from relevant analysis can only be a hypothesis, but cannot accurately confirm a certain result. Data analysis is somewhat simple. Can we further conduct data analysis and explore at a deeper level.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: Yes: worku chekol tassew

Reviewer #3: Yes: Hui Tan

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: REVIEW PLOS.docx

Decision Letter 2

Alice Mannocci

26 Jun 2023

PONE-D-22-35617R2Greater nurse density correlates to higher level of population ageing globally, but is more prominent in developed countries.PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. You,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 10 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Alice Mannocci, Ph.D, MS

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

I'm suggesting to the Authors in order to improve the quality of the manuscript to follow the comments of the review.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

********** 

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #3: The author has made significant revisions to the suggestions mentioned above, and will further refine the language of the article to avoid ambiguity. Does the author have any methods, interventions, and subsequent research to address this topic? Does rationality and necessity exist, and is there any significance for further in-depth research. The author can briefly narrate

********** 

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: review.docx

Decision Letter 3

Alice Mannocci

19 Sep 2023

Greater nurse density correlates to higher level of population ageing globally, but is more prominent in developed countries.

PONE-D-22-35617R3

Dear Dr. You,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Alice Mannocci, Ph.D, MS

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-35617_R3_reviewer1.pdf

Acceptance letter

Alice Mannocci

22 Sep 2023

PONE-D-22-35617R3

Greater nurse density correlates to higher level of population ageing globally, but is more prominent in developed countries.

Dear Dr. You:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Alice Mannocci

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer Attachments.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 0 Response to Review Decision.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: REVIEW PLOS.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 0 REVIEW PLOS_FD.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: review.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 0 Response to Review Decision.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-35617_R3_reviewer1.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data sources are described within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES