Table 2.
Efficacy analysis (primary endpoint).
| Combination | No. (%) | Maintenance | No. (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best response | Best response | ||
| n | 55 | 55 | |
| CR | 9 (16.4%) | CR | 19 (34.5%) |
| CRu | 3 (5.5%) | CRu | 4 (7.3%) |
| PR | 33 (60.0%) | PR | 25 (45.5%) |
| SD | 5 (9.1%) | SD | 3 (5.5%) |
| PD | 4 (7.3%) | PD | 4 (7.3%) |
| Not assessed | 1 (1.8%) | ||
| Overall response | Overall response | ||
| n | 55 | ||
| OR | 45 (81.8%) | OR | 48 (87.3%) |
Reported separately at the end of the combination therapy with bortezomib and ibrutinib (left), and during the maintenance with ibrutinib (maintenance, right).
CR, complete remission; CRu, complete remission unconfirmed; PR, partial remission; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease. Response according to Cheson, 1999.12