Table 5.
Summary of the linear regression for oleic acid (C18:1) in milk in g/100 g fat with random effects (cow ID, farm ID), observations: n = 2,432
C18:1 | Mean (SD) | Coefficient (95% CI, P-value) |
---|---|---|
Cowtype | ||
Healthy (= ref) | 0.8 (0.8) | — |
Clever | −0.5 (0.6) | −1.23 (−1.30 to −1.16, P < 0.001) |
Athletic | 1.5 (1.1) | 0.78 (0.65 to 0.91, P < 0.001) |
Hypket. | −0.3 (0.7) | −1.03 (−1.20 to −0.87, P < 0.001) |
PMAS | 1.6 (1.0) | 0.80 (0.64 to 0.97, P < 0.001) |
Parity | ||
Multip. (= ref) | −0.1 (1.0) | — |
Healthy × Multip. (= ref) | — | |
Clever × Multip. | −1.13 (−1.19 to −1.07, P < 0.001) | |
Athletic × Multip. | 0.71 (0.59 to 0.83, P < 0.001) | |
hypket. × Multip. | −0.92 (−1.06 to −0.78, P < 0.001) | |
PMAS × Multip. | 0.37 (0.23 to 0.51, P < 0.001) | |
Primip. | 0.3 (1.1) | 0.44 (0.35 to 0.54, P < 0.001) |
Healthy × Primip. (= ref) | — | |
Clever × Primip. | −1.19 (−1.30 to −1.08, P < 0.001) | |
Athletic × Primip. | 0.16 (−0.07 to 0.38, P < 0.248) | |
Hypket. × Primip. | −0.72 (−1.21 to −0.24, P < 0.014) | |
PMAS × Primip. | 0.69 (0.43 to 0.95, P < 0.001) | |
Week | ||
1 (= ref) | 0.3 (1.2) | — |
2 | 0.5 (1.1) | 0.20 (0.00 to 0.40, P < 0.047) |
3 | 0.2 (1.0) | −0.08 (−0.27 to 0.12, P < 0.441) |
4 | −0.0 (0.9) | −0.33 (−0.52 to −0.13, P < 0.001) |
5 | −0.1 (1.0) | −0.40 (−0.59 to −0.21, P < 0.001) |
6 | −0.3 (0.9) | −0.58 (−0.77 to −0.39, P < 0.001) |
7 | −0.3 (0.8) | −0.61 (−0.81 to −0.42, P < 0.001) |
8 | −0.4 (0.8) | −0.76 (−1.09 to −0.42, P < 0.001) |
log(milk yield) [−11.3,3.0] | 0.0 (1.0) | −0.17 (−0.21 to −0.13, P < 0.001) |
Healthy × log(milk yield) (= ref) | ||
Clever × log(milk yield) | −0.01 (−0.04 to 0.02, P < 0.684) | |
Athletic × log(milk yield) | −0.29 (−0.38 to −0.20, P < 0.001) | |
Hypket. × log(milk yield) | −0.04 (−0.21 to 0.13, P < 0.707) | |
PMAS × log(milk yield) | −0.13 (−0.26 to 0.01, P < 0.120) |
Ref, reference; hypket., hyperketonemic; PMAS, poor metabolic adaptation syndrome; primip., primiparous; multip., multiparous.