Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 28;12(5):358–365. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2022.0161

Table 2.

Comparative Analysis of the Median, Standard Error, Difference Means ± SD, and 95% CI Values Obtained in the Fatigue Subscale, Fact-G, and Facit-F Domains of the FACIT-F Questionnaire and Scale Modified of Borg Analyzed at EXE Intervention and WI Times

 
EXE (n = 38)
WI (n = 38)
EXE vs. WI
Variables Pre Post Difference ± SD P a Pre Post Difference ± SD P a P b ES
FS 39.00 (1.32) 48.00 (0.78) 10.15 ± 6.40 (8.07–12.22) <0.001b 41.00 (1.67) 38.00 (1.50) −1.41 ± 8.98 (−4.32–1.50) 0.391 <0.001a 1.482
FACT-G 82.00 (2.26) 91.00 (2.01) 7.04 ± 11.22 (3.40–10.67) <0.001b 83.57 (2.57) 77.66 (2.46) −9.50 ± 9.16 (−1.13–8.06) 0.129 <0.001a 1.615
FACIT-F 121.00 (3.09) 138.00 (2.60) 17.90 ± 12.12 (12.92–21.44) <0.001b 127.66 (3.89) 115.16 (3.62) −12.77 ± 15.77 (−11.17–1.41) 0.097 0.034a 2.181
BORG 7.00 (0.32) 4.00 (0.23) −2.95 ± 2.50 (−3.76− −2.14) <0.001b 1.694
a

Wilcoxon test (Pre vs. Post).

b

Mann–Whitney test (EXE vs. WI).

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; ES, effect size; EXE, exergaming; FACIT-F, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; FACT-G, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General; FS, fatigue subscale; SD, standard deviation; WI, without intervention.