Gaughan 1997.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation claimed, but detail not provided |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | One ND arm participant withdrew: active injection with mycobacterium tuberculosis. It was not reported that skin tuberculin tests were undertaken for study participants |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Investigators reported that although the study protocol was available, we were unable to obtain a copy. However, it was clear that the published reports included all expected outcomes |
Other bias | Low risk | Signed informed consent was obtained from all participants. Study protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Overall, participant demographic data were similar between groups |