Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2024 Jun 12:2023.09.18.557763. Originally published 2023 Sep 19. [Version 3] doi: 10.1101/2023.09.18.557763

Fig. 5. Principal variations of neural state-trait features co-vary with the principal variations of behavioral phenotypes, highlighting individual life function outcomes associated with emotion regulation, cognitive function and alcohol and substance use.

Fig. 5.

(A) Correlation structure between 262 behavioral variables, which were obtained from the HCP S1200 unrestricted and restricted data. Colorbars along each axis of the correlation matrix indicate color-codes for the category of each variable. Categories were defined from the HCP data dictionary available online (HCP_S1200_DataDictionary_April_20_2018.csv). Variables measuring response time (RT) from tasks were transformed into 1/RT to account for the fact that a shorter response time indicates better task performance. See Supplementary Fig. S14 for the list of all behavioral variables. (B) The first PC explained 11.2% of variance. The first 15 PCs explaining ~ 50% of variance were considered in further analysis. (C) Across 1,000 permutations for split-half resampling, we compared if the geometry of estimated PCs in two splits are consistent. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was computed for each pair of behavioral PCs. (D) Rank-ordered loadings of each behavioral variable on the first principal component (PCA). Each data-point indicates a behavioral variables. PCA was performed for all 262 variables in (A). 39 subcategories shown on the y-axis were also defined using the HCP data dictionary. Several subcategories belonging to the same category are coded using the same color as in (A).