Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 10;50(11):3276–3289. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06279-0

Table 3.

Median and 95th percentile of Aβ metrics calculated in elderly healthy controls (n = 122 for PET-only analytical methods; n = 88 for analytical methods using T1-weighted MRI) that were visually assessed as Aβ-negative by five independent blinded readers

Software Metric Median 95th percentile
#1 MIMneuro Centiloid 5.01 25.09
#2 Hermes BRASS SUVR 1.17 1.29
#3 Neurocloud SUVR 1.08 1.28
#4 Standard centiloid Centiloid 2.07 20.94
#5 Neurology Toolkit Centiloid 5.56 22.97
#6 Neurology Toolkit Amyloid index  − 0.44  − 0.30
#7 SPM8 (WC) SUVR 1.09 1.21
#8 SPM8 (WC*) SUVR 0.88 0.98
#9 SPM8 (CGM) SUVR 1.18 1.33
#10 SPM8-PET only (WC) Centiloid 4.57 22.52
#11 PMOD Neuro SUVR 1.18 1.32
#12 CapAIBL Centiloid 1.81 18.32
#13 NMF CapAIBL Centiloid 2.95 17.59
#14 AmyloidIQ (PET only) Amyloid load 18.30 28.14
#15 AmyloidIQ (MR) Amyloid load 16.30 24.36

CGM cerebellar gray matter, NMF non-negative matrix factorisation, SPM statistical parametric mapping, SUVR standardized uptake value ratio, WC whole cerebellum (volume weighted average of CGM and WC), WC* whole cerebellum (average of CGM and cerebellar WM)