Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 11;2015(11):CD010435. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010435.pub2

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Adjunctive steroid versus placebo for reducing death in neonatal bacterial meningitis.

Adjunctive steroid versus placebo for reducing death in neonatal bacterial meningitis
Patient or population: neonates with clinical and microbiological features of bacterial meningitis
 Settings: neonatal care facilities in both developed and developing countries
 Intervention: adjunctive steroid versus placebo
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) Number of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control Adjunctive steroid vs placebo
All‐cause death until hospital discharge Study population RR 0.46 
 (0.24 to 0.88) 132
 (2 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 very lowa‐e Daoud 1999 was a quasi‐randomised trial. Mathur 2013 was an open trial
The direction of effect was different in the 2 studies
Concern has been expressed regarding imprecision, as both trials enrolled few infants
354 per 1000 163 per 1000 
 (85 to 312)
Medium‐risk population
340 per 1000 156 per 1000 
 (82 to 299)
Number of participants with developmental delay Study population RR 0.77 
 (0.32 to 1.87) 38
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 lowa,d Daoud 1999 was a quasi‐randomised trial
389 per 1000 300 per 1000 
 (124 to 727)
Medium‐risk population
389 per 1000 300 per 1000 
 (124 to 727)
Hearing loss at 2 years of age Study population RR 1.8 
 (0.18 to 18.21) 38
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 lowa,d Daoud 1999 was a quasi‐randomised trial
Concern has been expressed regarding imprecision, as Daoud 1999 enrolled only 52 infants
56 per 1000 101 per 1000 
 (10 to 1000)
Medium‐risk population
56 per 1000 101 per 1000 
 (10 to 1000)
Hearing loss at 4 to 10 weeks after discharge Study population RR 0.41 
 (0.17 to 0.98) 59
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 lowb,e,f Mathur 2013 was an open trial, and duration of follow‐up was rather short
Concern has been expressed regarding imprecision, as Mathur 2013 enrolled only 80 infants
417 per 1000 171 per 1000 
 (71 to 409)
Medium‐risk population
417 per 1000 171 per 1000 
 (71 to 409)
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI)
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate

aDaoud 1999 was a quasi‐randomised trial.

bMathur 2013 was an open trial.
 cThe direction of effect was different in the two studies.

dConcern has been expressed regarding imprecision, as Daoud 1999 enrolled only 52 infants.

eConcern has been expressed regarding imprecision, as Mathur 2013 enrolled only 80 infants.

fIn Mathur 2013, the duration of follow‐up was rather short.