Dash 2019.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods |
Study design: RCT (abstract) Setting: India |
|
| Participants |
State of disease/disease type: unknown UC Inclusion criteria: newly diagnosed UC Exclusion criteria: not stated Age: mean: 39.68 (SD 10.07) years Sex: not stated Number randomised: 76 (Group 1); 76 (Group 2) Number analysed: not stated |
|
| Interventions |
Group 1: low‐dose vitamin D (dose not specified) Group 2: no intervention |
|
| Outcomes |
Duration of follow‐up: not stated Outcomes
|
|
| Notes |
Funding source: not stated Conflicts of interest: not stated |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Reported as randomised, although method of randomisation was not reported. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information to assess allocation concealment. |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Blinding was not reported. |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Blinding was not reported. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information to assess attrition. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Not yet published although abstract was presented in 2019. |
| Other bias | Low risk | No evidence that other significant sources of bias exist. |