Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2023 Sep 11:rs.3.rs-3153900. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3153900/v1

Table 2.

Anti-SMV HBGA blockade antibody response to SMV challenge in pre- and post- samples

Infection Statusa
Infected (n = 25) Uninfected (n = 8) P valuec
Day 1b
N 25 8
GMT (95% CI) 20.6 (16.0, 26.6) 25.0 (17.2, 36.4) 0.257
GMFR (95% CI) 0 0
Day 6
N 23 6
GMT (95% CI) 31.8 (21.1, 48.0) 50.0 (21.9, 114.4) 0.201
GMFR (95% CI) 1.6 (1.2, 2.0) 1.6 (0.9, 3.0) 0.935
Day 15
N 23 6
GMT (95% CI) 295.9 (141.4, 619.5) 67.3 (22.4, 202.5) 0.031
GMFR (95% CI) 14.6 (7.0, 30.7) 2.21 (0.9, 5.6) 0.018
Day 30
N 23 5
GMT (95% CI) 247.0 (121.6, 501.5) 50.0 (13.6, 183.7) 0.034
GMFR (95% CI) 12.2 (6.0, 25.0) 1.6 (0.5, 5.2) 0.011
Day 45
N 22 5
GMT (95% CI) 171.0 (93.8, 311.1) 50.0 (17.9, 139.9) 0.037
GMFR (95% CI) 8.5 (4.7, 15.6) 1.59 (0.7, 3.8) 0.010
a

Infection was defined as SMV RNA positive in any post-challenge stool sample detected by RT-qPCR.

b

Day 1 was pre-challenge

c

Kruskal-Wallis P value indicating probability of statistically significant difference in GMT and GMFR between infected and uninfected subjects post challenge

Abbreviation: CI - confidence interval, GMT - geometric mean antibody titers, GMFR - geometric mean fold rise