Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 29;6(9):e2336207. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36207

Table 4. Attenuation of Racial Differences in Ideal Cardiovascular Health by Neighborhood Factors and Individual Stressors Overall and Stratified by Gender.

Model % Change in β (95% CIs)a,b,c
Study population Men Women
Model 1: adjusted for demographicsd 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Model 2: adjusted for model 1 + neighborhood physical environment 5.14 (3.27 to 7.15) 5.59 (1.51 to 10.23) 4.81 (2.27 to 7.32)
Model 3: adjusted for model 1 + neighborhood safety 6.27 (2.46 to 10.05) 12.32 (2.08 to 22.42) 4.38 (0.33 to 8.98)
Model 4: adjusted for model 1 + neighborhood social cohesion 1.41 (0.48 to 2.60) 4.95 (1.24 to 9.26) 0.76 (−0.25 to 1.93)
Model 5: adjusted for model 1 + perceived stress 1.18 (−0.07 to 2.64) 1.59 (−0.94 to 4.94) 1.22 (−0.57 to 2.90)
Model 6: adjusted for model 1 + discrimination 11.01 (3.22 to 19.15) 3.62 (−21.8 to 29.32) 14.37 (6.50 to 22.23)
Model 7: adjusted for model 1 + all potential mediators (fully adjusted) 12.27 (3.58 to 20.86) 9.15 (−17.60 to 35.67) 13.68 (4.51 to 23.01)
a

Ideal cardiovascular health is treated as a continuous variable.

b

Calculated as the difference in the β coefficient for race in the reference model (adjusted for age, education, income, and marital status) and separate models further adjusted for each characteristic of interest compared with the β coefficient for race in the reference model.

c

Bootstrapped CIs.

d

The β coefficients for race in the reference model (Black participants compared with White participants) are: overall, β = −0.70 (95% CI, −0.81 to −0.59); men, β = −0.36 (95% CI, −0.53 to −0.18); and women, β = −0.88 (95% CI, −1.01 to −0.74).