Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Discov Today. 2023 Jul 28;28(10):103728. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103728

Table 3.

Comparison of adjusted performance measurement between subenzymes and tools

Performance measurement Subenzym
CYP1A2 CYP2C9 CYP2C19 CYP2D6 CYP3A4 All
CYPlebrity
Cohen’s κ 0.21 0.20 0.35 0.35 0.39 0.31
MCC 0.34 0.20 0.36 0.36 0.42 0.33
SuperCYPsPred: MACCS fingerprint
Cohen’s κ 0.30 0.06 0.38 0.25 0.11 0.23
MCC 0.32 0.08 0.38 0.28 0.11 0.24
SuperCYPsPred: Morgan fingerprint
Cohen’s κ 0.11 −0.15 0.32 0.20 0.08 0.15
MCC 0.15 −0.15 0.33 0.24 0.09 0.16
SuperCYPsPred: consistent result only
Cohen’s κ 0.29 −0.14 0.40 0.30 0.11 0.25
MCC 0.31 −0.14 0.40 0.32 0.11 0.25
SuperCYPsPred: higher confidence
Cohen’s κ 0.19 −0.04 0.32 0.27 0.11 0.20
MCC 0.20 −0.04 0.33 0.31 0.11 0.21
ADMET Predictor
Cohen’s κ 0.09 0.28 0.29 0.48 0.28 0.32
MCC 0.14 0.36 0.30 0.56 0.36 0.38
ADMET lab
Cohen’s κ 0.16 0.14 0.53 0.33 0.06 0.26
MCC 0.30 0.14 0.55 0.35 0.08 0.28