Skip to main content
. 2023 May 18;5(5):667–672. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.04.004

Table 3.

Relationship Between Subject Characteristics and Failure of PRP Procedure

Variable N OR (95% CI) P value
LCL complex injection 38 35.00 (3.20–381.51) .003
LCL complex involvement (n vs y) 39 11.80 (1.75–79.54) .01
Age (increase in age) 39 0.99 (0.90–1.10) .90
BMI Group, (increase in BMI group) 39 1.49 (0.48–4.66) .49
Tobacco use (n vs y) 39 3.63 (0.49–26.61) .21
Preprocedure corticosteroid injection (n vs y) 39 1.54 (0.27–8.82) .63
CET tear (n vs y) 39 1.45 (0.13–15.80) .76
Fibromyalgia (n vs y) 39 0.94 (0.02–42.66) .97
Heavy work (n vs y) 39 13.79 (0.66–287.59) .09
Preprocedure pain medication (n vs y) 39 2.00 (0.17–23.25) .58
Work comp (n vs y) 39 4.38 (0.61–31.60) .14
Subsequent procedure (n vs y) 39 3.63 (0.49–26.61) .21
Time to procedure from onset 39 0.69 (0.21–2.32) .55

BMI, body mass index; comp, compensation; n, no; OR, odds ratio; y, yes.

Bolded P values indicate statistical significance.