Table 3.
Study quality assessment for individual studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies
| Study | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Overall quality | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representativeness of the exposed cohort |
Selection of the non-exposed cohort Ascertainment of exposure | Assessment of outcome | Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | Comparability of cohorts based on the design or analysis controlled for confounders | Assessment of outcome | Whether follow-up was long enough for outcomes to occur | Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts | ||||
| Hiraoka et al.2023 [13] | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | Good | |||
| Kim et al. 2022 [14] | * | * | * | * | ** | * | Poor | ||||
| Maesaka et al.2022 [15] | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | |||
| Niizeki et al.2022 [16] | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | Good | |||
| Persano et al.2022 [17] | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | ||
| Rimini et al. 2022 [18] | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | ||
| Su et al. 2022 [19] | * | * | * | * | * | * | Poor | ||||
| Casadei-Gardini et al. 2023 [12] | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | Good | ||