Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 29;11:e16107. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16107

Table 2. Leaf area (LA) and specific leaf area (SLA) of Populus sibirica and Ulmus pumila across different treatments measured in July, 2021 and July, 2022.

Different lowercase letters within each species indicate significant differences among the treatments at α = 0.05. Vertical bars represent standard errors.

Species Treatments LA SLA
July, 2021 July, 2022 July, 2021 July, 2022
Populus sibirica CONT 8.21 ± 2.23ab 6.98 ± 0.38d 26.20 ± 0.62ab 24.16 ± 0.72c
2 L h−1 9.52 ± 2.14ab 9.30 ± 0.76b 25.40 ± 0.87ab 26.75 ± 0.54ab
4 L h−1 10.69 ± 2.86a 8.67 ± 0.42bc 27.95 ± 1.11a 25.79 ± 0.60bc
8 L h−1 10.16 ± 2.62a 7.64 ± 0.41cd 26.43 ± 0.87ab 26.82 ± 0.68ab
NPK
2 L h−1+NPK 6.07 ± 2.02b 8.64 ± 0.67bc 25.99 ± 0.29ab 28.65 ± 1.11a
4 L h−1+NPK 8.81 ± 1.95ab 7.08 ± 0.25d 26.17 ± 0.37ab 25.03 ± 0.48bc
8 L h−1+NPK 9.91 ± 1.78ab 9.27 ± 0.51b 26.21 ± 0.58ab 25.57 ± 0.31bc
COMP
2 L h−1+COMP 8.05 ± 3.28ab 8.17 ± 0.48bcd 24.71 ± 0.34b 25.35 ± 0.88bc
4 L h−1+COMP 8.68 ± 2.78ab 10.81 ± 0.20a 23.91 ± 0.40b 24.29 ± 0.45c
8 L h−1+COMP 8.91 ± 3.13ab 8.83 ± 0.41bc 26.12 ± 1.71ab 25.03 ± 0.42bc
Ulmus pumila CONT 4.04 ± 0.19c 2.55 ± 0.18c 24.07 ± 0.81a 26.21 ± 0.61abc
2 L h−1 6.86 ± 0.21a 3.17 ± 0.41bc 19.81 ± 0.94cd 22.36 ± 0.46bcde
4 L h−1 5.62 ± 0.45b 2.81 ± 0.30bc 18.21 ± 0.36ef 28.33 ± 5.80a
8 L h−1 3.02 ± 0.26cd 2.38 ± 0.17cd 21.89 ± 0.15b 20.13 ± 0.60def
NPK 2.73 ± 0.37d 1.70 ± 0.15d 21.12 ± 0.37bc 26.39 ± 0.41ab
2 L h−1+NPK 5.23 ± 0.21b 4.08 ± 0.34a 21.06 ± 0.27bc 24.17 ± 0.46abcd
4 L h−1+NPK 6.12 ± 0.63ab 3.49 ± 0.35ab 19.15 ± 0.27de 19.36 ± 0.31def
8 L h−1+NPK 5.57 ± 0.40b 3.15 ± 0.15bc 17.38 ± 0.72f 17.01 ± 0.36ef
COMP 5.72 ± 0.36b 2.49 ± 0.16c 21.99 ± 0.41b 24.59 ± 1.41abcd
2 L h−1+COMP 3.61 ± 0.19cd 2.50 ± 0.11c 21.47 ± 0.31b 23.34 ± 0.57abcd
4 L h−1+COMP 2.77 ± 0.27d 2.87 ± 0.22bc 14.88 ± 0.37g 16.45 ± 0.23f
8 L h−1+COMP 5.57 ± 0.48b 3.58 ± 0.15ab 20.54 ± 0.24bcd 20.52 ± 1.47cdef