Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 29;11:e16107. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16107

Table 4. Seasonal variation of the predawn (ψp) and midday (ψm) leaf water potentials in Populus sibirica and Ulmus pumila across different treatments measured in July 2021 and July 2022.

Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at α = 0.05.

Species Treatments ψ p ψ m
July, 2021 July, 2022 July, 2021 July, 2022
Populus sibirica CONT −0.82 ± 0.11c −0.86 ± 0.56ab −1.29 ± 0.05abc −1.71 ± 0.53bc
2 L h−1 −0.41 ± 0.08abc −0.66 ± 0.47c −1.10 ± 0.07a −1.98 ± 0.38c
4 L h−1 −0.35 ± 0.01ab −1.01 ± 0.36abc −1.09 ± 0.02a −1.72 ± 0.19bc
8 L h−1 −0.40 ± 0.04abc −0.97 ± 0.17abc −1.53 ± 0.09cd −1.43 ± 0.27ab
NPK
2 L h−1+NPK −0.51 ± 0.03c −0.61 ± 0.2a −1.38 ± 0.08bc −1.45 ± 0.35ab
4 L h−1+NPK −0.52 ± 0.06c −0.66 ± 0.30a −1.63 ± 0.09de −1.34 ± 0.35ab
8 L h−1+NPK −0.31 ± 0.05a −0.83 ± 0.46ab −1.5 ± 0.09bcd −1.55 ± 0.29abc
COMP
2 L h−1+COMP −0.51 ± 0.03c −0.89 ± 0.15bc −1.85 ± 0.10e −1.28 ± 0.17ab
4 L h−1+COMP −0.48 ± 0.04bc −1.13 ± 0.57bc −1.27 ± 0.03ab −1.28 ± 0.52ab
8 L h−1+COMP −0.35 ± 0.03ab −1.19 ± 0.48bc −1.69 ± 0.07de −2.74 ± 0.24bc
Ulmus pumila CONT −1.91 ± 0.18b −2.33 ± 0.53e −2.74 ± 0.07c −2.46 ± 0.54bc
2 L h−1 −0.57 ± 0.07a −1.78 ± 0.26de −1.77 ± 0.12ab −1.99 ± 0.24ab
4 L h−1 −0.48 ± 0.02a −1.27 ± 0.57abcd −1.79 ± 0.04ab −1.96 ± 0.35ab
8 L h−1 −0.71 ± 0.05a −0.98 ± 0.21abc −1.62 ± 0.49a −1.68 ± 0.65a
NPK −2.08 ± 0.22b −1.59 ± 0.26dc −2.35 ± 0.17bc −2.86 ± 0.28c
2 L h−1+NPK −0.80 ± 0.10a −1.34 ± 0.10bcd −1.92 ± 0.06ab −1.54 ± 0.16a
4 L h−1+NPK −0.90 ± 0.02a −0.66 ± 0.35a −1.79 ± 0.04a −1.51 ± 0.56a
8 L h−1+NPK −0.71 ± 0.05a −0.83 ± 0.16ab −1.86 ± 0.07ab −1.55 ± 0.48a
COMP −1.11 ± 0.64a −1.43 ± 0.28bcd −2.56 ± 0.12c −2.15 ± 0.28ab
2 L h−1+COMP −0.70 ± 0.05a −0.99 ± 0.25abc −1.79 ± 0.11ab −1.89 ± 0.26ab
4 L h−1+COMP −0.60 ± 0.01a −1.08 ± 0.24abc −1.49 ± 0.08a −1.87 ± 0.23ab
8 L h−1+COMP −0.43 ± 0.07a −1.35 ± 0.36bcd −1.59 ± 0.26a −2.05 ± 0.35ab