Table 3.
Showing the differences in calculation of trigger delay derived from the formula, operator decision and the deep learning
Trigger delay (ms) | Formula vs operator | Formula vs deep learning | Operator vs deep learning | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean diff | P-value | 95% CI of diff | Mean diff | P-value | 95% CI of diff | Mean diff | P-value | 95% CI of diff | |
All | 73 ± 99 | < 0.01 | 36, 110 | 46 ± 110 | 0.02 | 9, 84 | − 26 ± 61 | 0.02 | − 49, − 4 |
Healthy | 37 ± 93 | 0.04 | 2, 72 | 35 ± 131 | 0.16 | − 14, 84 | − 2 ± 56 | 0.81 | − 23, 18 |
Patient (standardised AW) | 62 ± 72 | < 0.01 | 36, 89 | 52 ± 75 | < 0.01 | 23, 80 | − 11 ± 27 | 0.04 | − 21, − 1 |
Patient (variable AW) | 118 ± 110 | < 0.01 | 77, 159 | 53 ± 87 | < 0.01 | 20, 85 | − 66 ± 69 | < 0.01 | − 91, − 40 |
Formula | Operator | Deep learning | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean diff | P-value | 95% CI of diff | Mean diff | P-value | 95% CI of diff | Mean diff | P-value | 95% CI of diff | |
Healthy vs patient (all) | − 112 (35) | < 0.01 | − 184, − 40 | − 59 (50) | 0.26 | − 166, 48 | − 95 (60) | 0.14 | − 224, 34 |
Patient (standardised AW) vs patient (variable AW) | − 65 (55) | 0.26 | − 183, 54 | − 9 (47) | 0.86 | − 108, 91 | − 63 (53) | 0.25 | − 176, 49 |
This is further compared between the whole cohort and the healthy and patient participants. The mean difference was analysed using a one-sample t-test and presented as mean ± SD. Unpaired data was analysed using Welch’s t test and presented as mean and standard error. AW = Acquisition Window, CI of Diff = Confidence Interval of Difference. Statistically significant values (p<0.05) are indicated in bold