Table 3.

Generalized linear models for the association between EOSI and STIs.

Exposure: EOSI	Crude model			Adjusted model
	cPR	CI 95%	p	aPR	CI 95%	p
Analysis for all the sample
No EOSI	Ref.			Ref.
Yes EOSI	1.26	1.09–1.47	0.002	1.27a	1.08–1.51	0.005
Analysis for the subgroup living in urban areas
No EOSI	Ref.			Ref.
Yes EOSI	1.41	1.18–1.69	<0.001	1.36b	1.11–1.66	0.003
Analysis for the subgroup living in rural areas
No EOSI	Ref.			Ref.
Yes EOSI	0.89	0.74–1.07	0.223	1.00b	0.83–1.21	0.996
Analysis for the subgroup with history of MSP
No EOSI	Ref.			Ref.
Yes EOSI	0.92	0.43–1.99	0.833	0.75a	0.35–1.63	0.475
Analysis for the subgroup with no history of MSP
No EOSI	Ref.			Ref.
Yes EOSI	1.27	1.09–1.47	0.003	1.27a	1.08–1.51	0.005
Analysis for the subgroup in the lowest wealth quintile
No EOSI	Ref.			Ref.
Yes EOSI	0.88	0.71–1.06	0.168	0.95c	0.79–1.20	0.808
Analysis for the subgroup in the second lowest wealth quintile
No EOSI	Ref.			Ref.
Yes EOSI	1.04	0.78–1.39	0.789	0.97c	0.73–1.27	0.796
Analysis for the subgroup in the middle wealth quintile
No EOSI	Ref.			Ref.
Yes EOSI	1.46	1.08–1.97	0.013	1.42c	1.03–1.97	0.034
Analysis for the subgroup in the second highest wealth quintile
No EOSI	Ref.			Ref.
Yes EOSI	1.55	1.02–2.35	0.041	1.49c	0.93–2.38	0.095
Analysis for the subgroup in the highest wealth quintile
No EOSI	Ref.			Ref.
Yes EOSI	2.27	1.43–3.60	0.001	2.12c	1.33–3.39	0.002

^aAdjusted for age, marital status, level of education, wealth index, region of origin, area of residence, and contraceptive method.

^bAdjusted for age, marital status, level of education, wealth index, region of origin, and contraceptive method.

^cAdjusted for age, marital status, level of education, region of origin, and contraceptive method.

EOSI: Early Onset of Sexual Intercourse; STIs: Sexually Transmitted Infections; CPR: Crude Prevalence Ratio; APR: Adjusted Prevalence Ratio; MSP: Multiple Sexual Partners; PR: Prevalence Ratio; CI 95%: 95% Confidence Interval.