Skip to main content
Materia Socio-Medica logoLink to Materia Socio-Medica
. 2023;35(3):215–221. doi: 10.5455/msm.2023.35.215-221

Retrospective Study of the Correlation Between Twin Pregnancies and Perinatal Outcome in Association to the Impact of Preterm Birth

Spyridon Michalopoulos 1, Panagiotis Tsikouras 1, Vassiliki Varlami 2, Dimitrios Lambrinos 3, Anastasia Bothou 1, Konstantinos Nikolettos 1, Stavroula Papanikolopoulou 1, Georgios Marinos 4, Georgios Iatrakis 1, Nikolaos Nikolettos 1
PMCID: PMC10545924  PMID: 37795161

Abstract

Background:

Twin pregnancies make up 2% to 4% of all births. Incidence of spontaneous twin pregnancies varies around the world, with percentages ranging from 8/1000 to >17/1000 births. The variation in twin pregnancy rates is thought to be due to dizygotic pregnancies, since monozygotic pregnancies have a consistent incidence of 3.5/1000 to 4/1000 births. The incidence of twin pregnancies after the widespread use of assisted reproduction has increased significantly.

Objective:

The purpose of the present study is to investigate factors , who contribute to improve the perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies. Support will be provided by the results of twin pregnancies by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Demokrition University of Thrace (Alexandroupolis, Greece) in the last fifteen years.

Methods:

From the above Department, data were collected on the number of twin pregnancies, maternal age, gestational age, mode of delivery (spontaneous delivery or caesarean section), birth weight and rate of twin pregnancies with assisted reproduction.

Results:

The results showed the increasing trend of twin pregnancies and births. A total of 304 twin pregnancies were identified (rate 2.75%). The rate of assisted reproduction was 34.83% in our sample, while the rate of cesarean deliveries was 95.5%, showing a large increase in recent years. In ten cases, normal delivery was successfully performed. The gestational age in twin pregnancies that ended with normal delivery was 37.37 + 3 weeks and the fetuses were both cephalic presentations. The main reason for admission of newborns to the NICU Department was prematurity.

Conclusion:

The constantly improving education of perinatalists and understanding of the pathophysiology may lead to individualization of their treatment, and improvement of their prognosis based on recent scientific data from other international centers.

Keywords: Twin pregnancies, modus of terminating births, perinatal outcome

1. BACKGROUND

Twin pregnancies make up 2% to 4% of all births. In fact, the incidence of spontaneous twin pregnancies varies around the world, with percentages ranging from 8/1000 to >17/1000 births. Globally, the rate of twin pregnancy is 12.0 per 1000 births during the last years (1, 2). The variation in twin pregnancy rates is thought to be due to dizygotic pregnancies, since monozygotic pregnancies have a consistent incidence of 3.5/1000 to 4/1000 births (1, 2). The incidence of twin pregnancies after the widespread use of assisted reproduction has increased significantly. The rate of twin pregnancies using "in vitro fertilization (IVF)" or "microinsemination (ICSI)" is 20% to 40%, while using insemination and intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (IUI-COH) with ovulation induction is 10% to 15%. Most twins resulting from assisted reproduction are dizygotic (3-6). The incidence of dizygotic twins after assisted reproduction can be significantly reduced by using the embryo selection method and the selective transfer of an embryo. However, the incidence of monozygotic twin pregnancies after assisted reproduction remains higher compared to spontaneous monozygotic twin pregnancies. In fact, the incidence of monozygotic twin pregnancies after assisted reproduction is 0.9%. Due to the rise in artificial insemination over the past 20 years, there has been an increase in twin and multiple pregnancies, raising concerns about an associated rise in long-term morbidity. Both monozygotic and monochorionic twins following IVF appear to be at elevated risk in relation to blastocyst transfer and maternal age (under 35 years) (6-8).

Another factor that keeps twin pregnancy rates high after assisted reproduction is parents preferences. It has been found that up to 60% of couples prefer twin pregnancies .

In particular, specifically the age of the woman, the period of infertility and attempt to conceive trying to achieve pregnancy, the desire to avoid many IVFs and the transfer of fresh embryos lead couples to choose to conceive twins. Multiple pregnancies lead to higher rates of prematurity and low birth weight (LBW) neonates. The incidence of twin/multiple pregnancies is increasing due to advanced maternal age and the increase in assisted reproduction. Does chorionicity matter in terms of twin outcome ? Approximately 3.1 percent of live newborns are from twin pregnancies and varies between different countries (3). This variety is attributed to the change in the frequency of dizygotes (DZ) while monozygotes (MZ) are stable. For the Caucasian race, most twins are dizygotic (70%) and 30% MZ. (in the absence of the use of assisted reproductive technology). Chorionicity refers to the type of placenta (monochorionic, dichorionic placentas).Dichorionic placentas may be united or separate, however their examination shows the absence of anastomoses between the 2 placentas (8-12).

2. OBJECTIVE

The goal of this retrospective study was to investigate the fetal outcome in twin pregnancies in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Democritus University of Thrace and to compare these results with similar data from other international centers.

3. MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a 15-year retrospective study (2007-2022) of the records of deliveries performed at the University Obstetrics-Gynecology Clinic Alexandroupoli of the Democritus University of Thrace during the above period and data were collected regarding; the number of twin pregnancies, the age of the mother, the gestational age at delivery, the length of the cervix, the parity of the participating pregnant women, the modus of delivery, the birth weight, perinatal condition of newborns, the length of hospitalization time in the NICU, the percentage of twin pregnancies with assisted reproduction, the percentage of twin pregnancies with spontaneous conception, the percentage of twins among all deliveries, chorionicity , birth complications.

The retrospective study concerns twin pregnancies in order to investigate the following parameters:

  • a) The frequency of twin pregnancies;

  • b) The percentage of spontaneous conception or after assisted reproduction methods;

  • c) Method of obstetric outcome;

  • d) Determining the weeks of obstetric treatment of the reported pregnancies;

  • e) Assessment of perinatal morbidity.

Ethical approval for this prospective study was confirmed by the ethics committee of the University Hospital in Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, (Alexandroupolis, Greece; reference no. 8/33/25/6/2020). All patients provided written informed consent gave their written consent for their participation in the present study.

Statistical analysis

A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the final outcome of twin neonates. The data were analyzed with SPSS software. Relative (%) and absolute frequencies were presented for qualitative variables, while quantitative variables were presented using mean ± standard deviation. Chi-square test (χ2) was used for the univariate analysis of qualitative variables. Differences were considered as statistically significant at a p-value < 0.05. SPSS 23 for Windows was used for the analysis.

4. RESULTS

In our study, we utilized data from 304 twin neonates The mean age of the mothers was 33,28 years old (min=23, max=43, SD±3,36). The mean weight of the neonates was 1154,28mg (min=530, max=1500, SD±253,3). 54,9%(n=167) of the pregnant women were having their second childbirth, whilst 28,3%(n=86), 14,1%(n=43) and 2,6%(n=8), their first, third and fourth childbirth, respectively. 54,9%(n=167) of conception’s method were In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and the remaining 45,1%(n=137) followed the normal procedure. Almost all the fetuses (91,1%, n=277) were dichorionic (Table 1).

Table 1. Characteristics of the research sample.

N %
Conception Method IVF 167 54,9
Normal procedure 137 45,1
Number of childbirths of employment I 86 28,3
II 167 54,9
III 43 14,1
IV 8 2,6
Age(years,mean, SD) 33,28 ± 3,36
Weight(mg,mean, SD) 1154,28 ± 253,3
Chorionicity Monochorionic 27 8,9
Dichorionic 277 91,1

More than 1/3 of the mothers (37,8%, n=115) were diagnosed with diabetes during pregnancy. A similar percentage (36,2%, n=110) didn’t have any health problems. Of the remainder 18,4%(n=56) had thyroid problems, 5,3%(n=16) had juvenile diabetes, 2%(n=6) had Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and 0,3%(n=1) had Rheumatoid Arthritis (Table 2). We attempted to examine the factors affecting the perinatal outcome among women in our study. Similar percentage of monochorionic and dichorionic neonates (25,4% and 25,9% respectively) eventually died, but we didn’t find that chorionicity has a statistically significant correlation with perinatal outcome. Similar results were found when we tried to examine the effect of corticosteroids use to the neonates. More than ¾ (77%) of the neonates in which we administered corticosteroids had a normal growth, but again we didn’t find that corticosteroids use has a statistically significant correlation with perinatal outcome. As a second analysis of the previous question, we attempted to examine the effect of corticosteroids the number of corticosteroids doses on the neonates. In our study we administered 1 or 2 doses of corticosteroids. Almost the same percentages in the 2 groups, 73,5% for 1 dose and 83,6% for 2 doses, had normal growth.

Table 2. Medical conditions of the mothers.

Medical Condition N %
Diabetes of pregnancy 15 37,8
Healthy 110 36,2
Thyroid medical condition 56 18,4
Diabetes of youth 16 5,3
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus 6 2
Rheumatoid Arthritis 1 0,3

Finally, we attempted to examine the effect of pregnancy’s duration to the final outcome of neonates. It is well known in literature that preterm babies born in 29 weeks and earlier have higher morbidity and mortality rates than babies born after 30 weeks of gestation. In our study these data are verified. We separated our samples into 2 categories according to the week they were born. We found that gestational age 30 weeks and above is significantly associated with normal growth as final outcome.The results from the univariate analysis can be found in Table 3.

Table 3. Univariate analysis of the sample.

Variable Perinatal outcome
Death (%) Normal Growth (%) Transfer (%) P-Value
chorionicity
Monochorionic
Dichorionic
7 (25,9)
70 (25,4)
`
20 (74,1)
204 (73,6)
0
3 (1)
0.7
Corticosteroid use
Yes
No
35 (31,8)
42 (22)
74 (67,3)
150 (77)
1 (0,9)
2 (1)
0.175
Number of corticosteroid doses
1 Dose
2 Doses
30 (24,8)
10 (16,4)
89 (73,5)
61 (83,6)
2 (1,7)
0
0.116
Gestational age
29 weeks and earlier
30 weeks and above
56 (35,2)
21 (14,6)
101 (63,5)
123 (84,7)
2 (1,3)
1 (0,7)
<0.001

5. DISCUSSION

Twin pregnancies are associated with a 2 to 3.5 times increased risk of pregnancy pathology compared to singleton pregnancies. The incidence of these complications ranges from 12.9 % to 37 % mainly after 20 weeks of gestation. Increased production of chorioplacental lactogen (HPL) causes insulin resistance, while weight gain during pregnancy, body mass index and maternal age can lead to the onset of gestational diabetes. Also, the large increase in size of the uterus can lead to obstructive uropathy and UTIs, preterm delivery, placental abruption and premature rupture of membranes (PROM) as well as postpartum bleeding (13-16)

Women carrying multiples are 6 times more likely to deliver preterm and 13 times more likely to deliver before 32 weeks compared to singleton pregnancies. However, twins delivered before 32 weeks have twice the risk of cerebral hemorrhage, osteomalacia, and consequently stroke. of paralysis compared to babies from singleton pregnancies (17-22).

Preterm births affect 15 million newborns annually, with rates of 5% in European, 10% in American, and 18% in African countries. The leading cause of newborn fatalities and the main justification for neonatal hospitalization on a global scale is preterm delivery. Approximately 70 % and 36 % of neonatal and infant deaths are due to prematurity, respectively.Regardless of etiology, spontaneous preterm labor is the result of early cervical changes in length and dilation (23, 24).

Because obstetrician-gynecologists usually see pregnant women during the dynamic process of preterm labor, it is difficult to determine whether the cervix was actually incompetent or if some other process contributed to the changes in the cervix. This results in the diagnosis of cervical insufficiency. Uterus to be retroactively placed when a second-trimester miscarriage or premature birth has now taken place

Taking the above into consideration it is understandable that it is difficult to determine the true incidence of cervical insufficiency with studies suggesting that the true incidence is in the range of 1%. The presence of reduced cervical length during second trimester ultrasound assessment is associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery but is not sufficient to make a diagnosis of cervical insufficiency (26-31).

In cases of twin pregnancies, the predictive value of measuring the length of the cervix is lower compared to singleton pregnancies. In singleton pregnancies, the increase in the risk of preterm birth is observed at around 15 mm, while in twins at around 25 mm. Although the limitations are larger than in singleton pregnancies due to uterine hypertension, the cervix should still be evaluated in twin pregnancies. Therefore, between weeks 18 and 22 of pregnancy is when the cervix should be measured.

Cervical length in twin pregnancies less than 25 mm at 24 weeks' gestation is associated with a 6.9-fold increase in the likelihood of delivery before 37 weeks compared with cervical length greater than or equal to 25 mm (OR 6.9; 95% CI 2.0, 24.2) Also, a cervical length of less than 25 mm has been found to increase the probability of delivery before 28 weeks' gestation from 3.5% to 25.8% and before 37 weeks' gestation from 41.2% to 75.5%. Analysis of twenty-one studies that measured of cervical length in women carrying twins concluded that a cervical length of less than 20 mm at a gestational age between 20 weeks and 24 weeks of gestation increases the risk of delivery before 32 weeks of gestation from 6.8% to 42.4% and the risk of delivery before 34 weeks of gestation from 15.3 % to 61.9 % (33-36).

Furthermore, serial measurements of cervical length using transvaginal ultrasound have begun to be suggested as a better predictor of preterm labor in women carrying twins. In fact, in a study where they measured the cervical length consecutively in 4 periods [18 and 21 + 6 / 7 weeks (period 1), 22 and 24 + 6 / 7 (period 2), 25 and 27 + 6 / 7 ( period 3) and 28 and 32 weeks (period 4)] found that there was a statistically significant association between cervical length below the tenth percentile in each of the 4 periods and an increased risk of delivery before 32 weeks' gestation.

Specifically, during the 1st period the relative risk was increased by 7.2 times (RR = 7.2 (3.1 – 16.5), during the 2nd period by 15.3 times (RR = 15.3 (6.4 – 36.7), during the 3rd period by 10.3 times (RR = 10.3 (4.4 – 24.3) and in the 4th period by 23.1 times (RR = 23.1 (8.3 – 64.1) (33-36). Moreover , the benefit of consecutive measurements in the prognosis of preterm birth was demonstrated by the fact that compared to a single measurement, consecutive measurements in the 4 periods was associated with an increased rate of positive prognosis of preterm birth before 32 weeks of gestation from 28% (in one measurement) to 69% (in consecutive measurements).

And the positive predictive value increased from 5.21 (in one measurement) to 14.54 (in consecutive measurements), while the negative predictive value decreased from 0.76 (in one measurement) to 0.32 (in consecutive measurements) (33-36).

Funneling of the internal cervical os could also be used as an additional tool for predicting preterm labor in twin pregnancies. The sensitivity of internal cervical os at 22 weeks' gestation in predicting delivery before 32 weeks' and 35 weeks' gestation has been found to be 54% and 33%, respectively (33-36).

The specificity of cervical dilation at 22 weeks of gestation in predicting delivery before 32 weeks and 35 weeks of gestation is 89% and 91%, respectively. Furthermore, the sensitivity of finding a cervical length less than or equal to 30mm at 22 weeks of gestation for predicting preterm labor before 32 weeks and 35 weeks of gestation are 46% and 27%, respectively. The specificity of finding a cervical length less than or equal to 30 mm at 22 weeks of gestation for predicting preterm labor before 32 weeks and 35 weeks of gestation are 89% and 90%, respectively

The presence of funneling at 27 weeks of gestation had an increased sensitivity for predicting preterm birth before 32 weeks and 35 weeks of gestation (86% and 54%, respectively) with a specificity similar to that at 22 weeks of gestation (78% and 82%, respectively). Furthermore, the sensitivity of finding a cervical length less than or equal to 25 mm at 27 weeks of gestation for predicting preterm delivery before 32 weeks and 35 weeks of gestation is 100% and 54%, respectively 80. The specificity of finding a cervical length of uterine size less than or equal to 25 mm at 27 weeks of gestation for predicting preterm delivery before 32 weeks and 35 weeks of gestation is 84% and 87%, respectively (33-36).

In twin pregnancies, the risk of prematurity is significantly higher when the cervix appears shorter than 20 mm between 15 and 24 weeks of gestation, while in triplet pregnancies, a cervical length <25 mm between 15 and 24 weeks of gestation is associated with the occurrence of preterm birth below 32 weeks at a rate of 51%. In a study involving 464 twin pregnancies with ultrasound measurement of their cervix at 23 weeks (22-24 weeks) it was found that the risk of prematurity before 33 weeks was inversely related to the cervical length at this gestational age (33-36).

Specifically, the risk increases gradually from 2.5% when the length is 60 mm, to 5 % at a length of 40 mm, to 12 % at a length of 25 mm, to 17 % at a length of 20 mm and to 80 % at a length of 8 mm . In another multicenter prospective study with a sample of 383 twin pregnancies, it was found that the risk of preterm delivery before 28 weeks was 2.3% (1.5% for dichorionic twin pregnancies and 9.1% for monochorionic pregnancies), while before the risk of prematurity before 35 weeks of gestation reached 18.5% (17.1% for twin pregnancies and 29.5% for singleton pregnancies). The positive predictive value was 5 % for cervical length less than or equal to 20 mm, 7–8 % for length less than or equal to 25 mm, 16–17 % for length less than 30 mm and 34–48 % for length less than 35 mm (33-36).

The negative predictive value ranged from 1.2% at 28 weeks to 18.6% at 35 weeks. Therefore, based on the available studies on twin pregnancies, the ultrasound assessment of the cervical length around the 23rd week of pregnancy appears to be a useful diagnostic tool in the prediction of premature birth, with the limit of the critical length for a "short–dangerous" cervix being is set at 20–25 mm depending on the results of each study.

In fact, it has been estimated that approximately 58% of twins will be born before 37 weeks while 12% will be born before 34 weeks of gestation. Although births under 32 weeks of gestation are constitute only 1% to 2%, essentially these births are due responsible for 50% of long-term neurological problems as well as for and 60% of neonatal mortality. For this reason, the goal should be the early prediction and delay of preterm labor so that the final termination of labor is done occurs after 32 weeks of pregnancy (33-36).

Also, severe neonatal morbidity has been shown to occur at birth weights of less than 1500 grams. In particular, it is estimated that 10% of live neonates born below 1500 grams will develop mental retardation, vision problems, or behavioral issues. This implies that when preterm delivery occurs below 32 to 34 weeks of gestation, most obstetricians and gynecologists use aggressive treatment to prevent preterm delivery.

The administration of a cortisone regimen may have contributed positively to the excellent perinatal outcome, although the usefulness of cortisone in twin pregnancies has not yet been clarified, which was confirmed in our study (Table 3).

According to our study results we found no significant correlation between cortisone use , the number of cortisone doses administered and chorionicity and perinatal outcome (P-Value 0.7 ,p 0.175, p0.116) but a significant positive association was found with pregnancies earlier than 29 weeks and later than 30 weeks (P-Value < 0.0001) (Table 3).

Twin pregnancies are responsible for 10% of perinatal mortality and 60% of abnormal fetal positions.

In recent years, an increase in the frequency of twin pregnancies after spontaneous conception has been observed in developed countries, a fact that is mainly due to the decision to have children at a more advanced age 6% against 2.3% 4 years ago. In addition, an increase in the incidence of twin pregnancies worldwide was found during the last decade as a result of the increased demand for assisted reproduction methods. Twin pregnancies are characterized by a greater morbidity and perinatal mortality, as well as a greater maternal morbidity and mortality attributable primarily to the greatest danger of bleeding. There is an increase in the relative risk of stillbirth as well as an increased risk of adverse events during childbirth (37-38).

Neonatal mortality rates for twins compared to singleton pregnancies is 4.3/1000 versus 3.8/1000 for neonates weighing 2501-3000g, and 7.4/1000 versus 2.2/1000 for neonates weighing >3000g. This study also found twice the mortality during childbirth. In the same study it was further discovered that the above mortality for twins weighing >2500g is 1.221/1000 compared to a corresponding 0.34/1000 for singleton pregnancies (37-38).

The risk of perinatal death of twins has decreased over the past three decades, but a smaller reduction is observed in the most mature neonates (34-37 weeks) compared to the least mature ones. A higher perinatal mortality was also observed in twin neonates with a birth weight >2500g compared to equivalent weight neonates of singleton pregnancies (39-42).

Also important factors that influence the Obstetrician towards the choice of elective CS are the often found relatively advanced (>35 years) age of the participants, as well as the fact that the majority are first-borns. In cases of premature labor or severe intrauterine growth retardation, most recommend performing CS in pregnancies <32 weeks or when the birth weight is <1500g (42-45).

Regarding the method of conception, twin pregnancies after IVF, ICSI show a higher frequency of premature deliveries, births of newborns with low birth weight, and other complications. The risk of stillbirth increases after the completion of the 37th week of pregnancy and is 6-9 times greater in dichorionic twins and even more in monochorionic twins therefore, performing an elective CS at the 37th week for dichorionic twins and the 36th week for monochorionics is considered a reasonable option. The International society for twin studies and the SOGC recommend delivery before the completion of the 38th week of pregnancy and the suggest planning of a selective low transverse Caesarean section at the 38th week as a logical option. Absolute indications for performing CS are monoamniotic twins due to a high risk of prolapse of the umbilical cord, conjoined twins situation where the presentation of the first twin is not cephalic, and other absolute indications (42-45).

When the presentation of the 1st of the fetuses is in breech, a CS is recommended due to wedging and inability to descend the protruding parts through the pelvic canal, especially when the presentation of the 2nd is cephalic. Although this scenario very rare, it is associated with high perinatal mortality

Traditionally, when the presentation of the first is cephalic and there are no other complications, a vaginal delivery can be attempted. However, there is a lack of well-designed prospective studies. Even when the presentation is cephalic, the approach to vaginal delivery remains debatable due to the obstetric complications that may appear after the delivery of the 1st fetus (placental abruption, umbilical cord prolapse, fetal bradycardia). In this case, increased incidence of post-operative maternal infection should also be taken into account, emergency CS for the birth of the 2nd fetus becomes necessary (46-50).

According to the same study, the main cause of neonatal death in relation to vaginal delivery of the 2nd fetus is fetal asphyxia-acidosis. This condition can also cause cerebral palsy. It should also be noted that the majority of younger Obstetricians due to lack of sufficient training-experience may struggle to manage the increased requirements of Midwifery especially when the presentation of the second twin is not cephalic. According to the findings of Cerulo et al who applied a liberal policy regarding the choice CS when the presentation of the 2nd was not cephalic, an incidence of 84% of CS was recorded. There were similar rates of neonatal morbidity and mortality between the 2 twins. The decision on the method of delivery in twin pregnancies is increasingly challenging for the modern Obstetrician due to the large number of twin pregnancies resulting from the frequent use of assisted reproduction methods. The incidence of stillbirths and perinatal morbidity and mortality are greater in twin pregnancies. Several studies have shown that vaginal delivery of the second fetus is associated with increased perinatal morbidity and mortality, suggesting that elective CS in all twin pregnancies may significantly protect the second fetus (51-56).

6. CONCLUSION

In twin pregnancies according to our results the chorionicity and antenatal corticosteroid use, as well as the the number of administered corticosteroid doses did not significantly improve the perinatal outcome. However, a significant association was found between the perinatal outcome and the pregnancy week in which the labor was performed. Satisfactory results were found in cases where labor occurred later than 30th week. Furthermore multicentric future studies are necessary to confirm our findings and to investigate more factors to improve the perinatal outcome.

Acknowledgements:

Authors are grateful to the women who participated in this study.

Patient Consent Form:

Informed verbal consents were obtained from the participants before commencing the data collection.

Authors contribution:

MG designed the study and MK collected the data. All authors analyzed the data and gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved..

Conflict of interest:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financial support and sponsorship:

None.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Beyene M, Abdo Komicha M, Hussien H, Abdulwahed A, Hassen TA, Roba KT. Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies among mothers who gave birth in Adama Hospital Medical College, Central Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2022 Sep 29;17(9):e0275307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275307. eCollection 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Monden C, Pison G, Smits J. Twin Peaks: more twinning in humans than ever before. Hum Reprod. 2021 May 17;36(6):1666–1673. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dugoff L, Koelper NC, Chasen ST, Russo ML, Roman AS, Limaye MA, et al. BCell-free DNA screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancy: a large multicenter cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Apr 6; doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.04.002. S0002-9378(23)00229-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kushnir VA, Barad DH, Albertini DF, Darmon SK, Gleicher N. Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017 Jan 10;15(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12958-016-0225-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yang D, Chai M, Yang N, Yang H, Wen X, Wang J, et al. Blastocyst Transplantation Strategies in Women of Different Ages. J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 17;12(4):1618. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li Y, Chang Q, Mai Q. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of monozygotic twins resulting from assisted reproductive technology: a 10-year retrospective study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023 Jun 2;21(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12958-023-01104-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abuzeid OM, Deanna J, Abdelaziz A, Joseph SK, Abuzeid YM, Salem WH, et al. The impact of single versus double blastocyst transfer on pregnancy outcomes: A prospective, randomized control trial. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2017 Dec;9(4):195–206. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bensdorp AJ, Hukkelhoven CW, van der Veen F, Mol BWJ, Lambalk CB, van Wely M. Dizygotic twin pregnancies after medically assisted reproduction and after natural conception: maternal and perinatal outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:371–77. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sundaram V, Ribeiro S, Noel M. Multi-chorionic pregnancies following single embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage: a case series and review of the literature. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Dec;35(12):2109–2117. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1329-8. Epub 2018 Oct 25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mateizel I, Santos-Ribeiro S, Done E, et al. Do ARTs affect the incidence of monozygotic twinning? Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2435–41. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kozinszky Z, Surányi A. The High-Risk Profile of Selective Growth Restriction in Monochorionic Twin Pregnancies. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023 Mar 24;59(4):648. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Busnellli A, Dallagiovana C, Reschini M, Paffoni A, Fedele L, Somigliana E. Risk factors for monozygotic twinning after in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2018;111:302–314. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mendoza R, Jaureghui T, Diaz-Nunez M, de la Sota M, et al. Infertile Couples Prefer Twins: Analysis of Their Reasons and Clinical Characteristics Related to This Preference. J Reprod Infertil. 2018;19:167–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Okun N, Sierra S. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction. GENETICS COMMITTEE; SPECIAL CONTRIBUTORS. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Jan;36(1):64–83. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30685-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ronco A, Roero S, Arduino S, Arese A, Ferrando I, Scaltrito G, et al. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Does Not Worsen Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes of Twin Pregnancy. J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 26;12(9):3129. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Multifetal Gestations: Twin, Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Pregnancies: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 231. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun 1;137(6):e145–e162. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Su RN, Zhu WW, Wei YM, Wang C, Feng H, Lin L, Yang HX. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in multiple pregnancy: A multicentre study in the Beijing population. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2015 Sep 26;1(4):197–202. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2015.08.004. eCollection 2015 Dec. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chantanahom N, Phupong V. Clinical risk factors for preeclampsia in twin pregnancies. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 15;16(4):e0249555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249555. eCollection 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.llouch F, Burwick R, Gupta M, Bartal MF, Bicocca MJ, Chauhan SP, et al. The association between maternal insurance status on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. A Hum Hypertens. 2023 Feb 11; doi: 10.1038/s41371-023-00809-x. Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Kirmeyer S, Mathews TJ, et al. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Rep. 2011;60:1–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.RettwitzVolk W, Tran TM, Veldman A. Cerebralmorbidity in preterm twins. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003;13:218–23. doi: 10.1080/jmf.13.4.218.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sellier E, Goldsmith S, McIntyre S, Perra O, Rackauskaite G, Badawi N, et al. Cerebral palsy in twins higher multiple births: a Europe-Australia population-based study. Surveillance Of Cerebral Palsy Europe Group And The Australian Cerebral Palsy Register Group. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021 Jun;63(6):712–720. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14827. Epub 2021 Feb 2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mathews TJ, MacDorman MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2006 period linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010;58:1–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Womack LS, Rossen LM, Hirai AH. Urban-Rural Infant Mortality Disparities by Race and Ethnicity and Cause of Death. Am J Prev Med. 2020 Feb;58(2):254–260. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Nov 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Romero R, Dey SK, Fisher SJ. Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. Science. 2014;345:760–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1251816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fuchs IB, Henrich W, Osthues K, Dudenhausen JW. Sonographic cervical length in singleton pregnancies with intact membranes presenting with threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:554–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371:75–84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Feduniw S, Gaca Z, Malinowska O, Brunets W, Zgliczyńska M, Włodarczyk M. The Management of Pregnancy Complicated with the Previable Preterm Preterm Premature Rupture of the Membranes: What about a Limit of Neonatal Viability?-A Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022 Aug 22;12(8):2025. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12082025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chandiramani M, Shennan AH. SAC review Cervical insufficiency: prediction, diagnosis and prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;10:99–106. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Practice Bulletin. Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;12:372–9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000443276.68274.cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shennan A, Jones B. The cervix and prematurity: aetiology, prediction and prevention. Semmin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004;9:471–9. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2004.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moreno-Espinosa AL, Hawkins-Villarreal A, Coronado-Gutierrez D, Burgos-Artizzu XP, Martínez-Portilla RJ, Peña-Ramirez T, et al. Prediction of Neonatal Respiratory Morbidity Assessed by Quantitative Ultrasound Lung Texture Analysis in Twin Pregnancies. J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 20;11(16):4895. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Melamed N, Pittini A, Hiersch L, et al. Do serial measurements of cervical length improve the prediction of preterm birth in asymptomatic women with twin gestations? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:616.e1–616.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Hassan SS, et al. Transvaginal sonographic cervical length for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:128.e1–128.12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vayssière C, Favre R, Audibert F, et al. Cervical length and funneling at 22 and 27 weeks to predict spontaneous birth before 32 weeks in twin pre- gnancies: a French prospective multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1596–1604. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Collins A, Shennan A. A clinical opinion on how to manage the risk of preterm birth in twins based on literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:1125–30. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1037734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jarde A, Lewis-Mikhael AM, Dodd JM, et al. The More, the Better? Combining Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth in Women at Risk: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JOGC. 2017;39:1192–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Morrison J. Twin Gestation. J Perinatol. 2005;25:1–3. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Roman A, Ramirez A, Fox NS. Prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Mar;4(2S):100551. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100551. Epub 2021 Dec 8 Review. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rafael TJ, Berghella V, Alfirevic Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9:CD009166. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009166.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mönckeberg M, Valdés R, Kusanovic JP, Schepeler M, Nien JK, Pertossi E. Patients with acute cervical insufficiency without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation treated with cerclage have a good prognosis. J Perinat Med. 2019 Jul 26;47(5):500–509. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2018-0388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Oh KJ, Romero R, Park JY, Lee J, Conde-Agudelo A, Hong JS. Intra-amniotic infection/inflammation presenting with cervical insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221:140e1–140e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Romero R, Conde-Agudelo A, El-Refaie W, et al. Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a twin gestation and short cervix: an updated meta-analysis of individual patient data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49:303–14. doi: 10.1002/uog.17397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Enakpene CA, DiGiovani L, Jones TN, Marshalla M, Mastrogianis D, Della Torre M. Cervical cerclage for singleton pregnant patients on vaginal progesterone with progressive cervical shortening. Am J Obtstet Gynecol. 2018;219:397.e1–397.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Park JY, Jung YM, Kook SY, Jeon SJ, Oh KJ, Hong JS. The effect of postoperative vaginal progesterone in ultrasound-indicated cerclage to prevent preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;26:1–8. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1668371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Barrett JFR. Twin delivery Best.Practice and Research. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2014;18(4):625–630. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Varner MW1, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Moawad AH, Hauth JC, Landon MB. National Institute of Child Health Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit cesarean registry: trial of labor with a twin gestation. Am.JOG. 2005;193:l135–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cetrulo CL. The controversy of mode of delivery in twins: the intrapartum management of twin gestation (Part I) Semin Perinatol. 1986 Jan;10(1):39–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gupta P, Faridi MM, Goel N, Zaidi ZH. Reappraisal of twinning: epidemiology and outcome in the early neonatal period. Singapore Med J. 2014 Jun;55(6):310–7. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2014083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schmitz T, Carnavalet Cde C, Azria E, Lopez E, Cabrol D, Goffinet F. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):695–703. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318163c435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fox NS1, Rebarber A, Roman AS, Klauser CK, Saltzman DH. Cervical length at 30-32 weeks and the risk of Cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:510–514. doi: 10.1002/uog.10069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Joseph KS, Allen AC, Dodds L, Vincer MJ, Armson BA. Causes and consequences of recent increases in preterm birth among twins. Obstet.Gynecol. 2001;98:57–64. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01394-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Algert SC, Morris JM, Bowen JR, Giles W, Roberts CL. Twin deliveries and place of birth in NSW2001-2005. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2009;49:461–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01054.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Allen VM, Windrim R, Barrett J, Ohlsson A. Management of monoamniotic twin pregnancies: a case series and systematic review of the literature. BJOG. 2001;108(9):931–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sullivan CA, Harkins D, Seago DP, Roberts WE, Morisson JC. Cesarean delivery for the second twin in vertex-vertex presentation;operative indications and predictability. South.Med.J. 1998 Feb;91(2):155–158. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199802000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Caukwell S, Murphy DJ. The effect of mode of delivery and gestational age on neonatal outcome of the non-cephalic- presenting second twin. AmJOG. 2002;5:1356–1361. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.128090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sibony O, Touitou S, Luton D, Oury JF, Blot PH. A comparison of the neonatal morbidity of second twins to that of a low-risk population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Jun 10;108(2):157–63. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00435-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Materia Socio-Medica are provided here courtesy of The Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina

RESOURCES