Skip to main content
. 1998 Jan;42(1):83–87. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.1.83

TABLE 2.

Pathological signs and production parameters for each group of birdsa

Group % Mortality % Morbidity Mean air sac lesion scoreb % Birds with severe lesions Mean total cage wt (g) of surviving birds (day 21) Feed conversion ratioc
1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.253 ± 598 2.2 ± 0.2
2 43.5 ± 15.2d 88.8 ± 29.8d 2.6 ± 0.5d 17.8 ± 10.0d 10,082 ± 2,964d 2.8 ± 0.6
3 6.7 ± 8.4d,e 32.3 ± 13.6d,e 0.6 ± 0.4d,e 2.2 ± 3.4e 17,642 ± 1,797e 2.2 ± 0.2e
4 11.0 ± 6.8d,e 45.3 ± 10.6d 0.8 ± 0.3d,e 6.7 ± 6.0d,e 17,607 ± 479d,e 2.1 ± 0.1e
5 16.8 ± 9.3d,e 59.1 ± 12.1d 1.4 ± 0.3d,e 11.3 ± 7.0d 15,487 ± 1,402d,e 2.1 ± 0.3e
6 19.2 ± 16.7d,e 67.5 ± 14.1d 1.6 ± 0.5d,e 12.5 ± 7.9d 16,438 ± 3,174e 2.1 ± 0.3e
7 20.0 ± 8.2d 73.0 ± 0.0d 1.8 ± 0.2d,e 7.8 ± 6.6d 16,041 ± 2,430d,e 2.2 ± 0.3
8 27.2 ± 17.2d 79.3 ± 12.5d 2.1 ± 0.6d 19.9 ± 9.9d 13,023 ± 4,090d 2.6 ± 0.6
a

Values are means ± standard deviations. 

b

Air sac lesions were scored on a scale of from 0 to 4 (see text). 

c

The feed conversion ratio is calculated for each group of birds by taking the total feed consumed between days −4 and 21 and dividing it by the increase in the mass of the birds over the same time period (data not corrected for dead birds). 

d

Significantly different from group 1 (P < 0.05). 

e

Significantly different from group 2 (P < 0.05).