Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 3;19(4):e1355. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1355

Table 3.

Study characteristics.

Study Intervention name Section A (1) Population characteristics (CYP) Significant differences at baseline Section A (2) Population characteristics (OP) Significant differences at baseline Who have outcomes been reported for? Country Section C—Outcomes (OP)
Carcavilla (2020) Smile Connect

Age

INT M 16.2 years (SD 0.97)

CON M 16.3 years (SD 0.48)

Recruitment setting

secondary school in Italy

Total number recruited n = 48 (24 per group)

Gender

Female 100%

Ethnicity

Italian (otherwise not reported)

None

Age

INT Mean 83.8 years (SD 7.89)

CON Mean 81.5 years (SD 10.9)

Recruitment setting

place of residence (care home)

Place of residence

one of three residential care homes in Spain

Total number recruited n = 46 (CON 25, INT 21)

Gender

INT 70% Female

CON 52% Female

Ethnicity

Spanish (otherwise not reported)

None for age, education or cognitive capacity

Children and/or young people

Older people

Italy

Spain

Self esteem

Mental Health

Cardona (2002) None—Task orientated intergenerational program

Age

Mean 16.67 (SD 0.56)

Recruitment setting

school

Total number recruited n = 3

Gender

Female 66.6% (n = 2)

Male 33.3% (n = 1)

Ethnicity

not described

Not reported

Age

67–92 range

INT Mean 87.57 (SD 3.95)

CON Mean 80.83 (SD 8.77)

Recruitment setting

assisted living facility

Place of residence

assisted living facility

Total number recruited n = 13

Gender

4 Male 9 Female

Ethnicity

not described

Not reported

Children and/or young people

intended to be both but only ended up with 3 younger people

Older people

USA

Depression

Self‐esteem

Chippendale (2015) Living Legends

Age

not reported but in tertiary education 18+

Recruitment setting

not reported

Total number recruited n = 24 students (6 at each site)

Gender

not described

Ethnicity

not reported

Not reported

Age

CON mean 75.81 years (SD 10.86)

INT mean 77.85 years (SD 8.55)

Recruitment settingfour community based older adult programme sites in New York City

Place of residence

living in their own apartment

Total number recruited

n = 47 (data only from 39), from four sites 3 were retirement community programs and 1 was a senior centre.

Gender

CON Male n = 1 (5.9%)

Female n = 15 (93.8%)

INT Male n = 3 (13%)

Female n = 20 (87%)

Ethnicity

White 57.5%

African American 36%

Middle Eastern 12.5%

None Older people USA

Agency

MLQ‐Presence Scores

Dawson (2017) Ageless Play

Age

Not reported but range is 6–11 years

Recruitment setting

school

Total number recruited

Not reported (matched pairs for the OP so 17?)

Gender

not described

Ethnicity

not reported

Not reported

Age

Mean age 71 years (SD 8.15), range 55–84 years

Recruitment setting

Word of mouth, flyers, letter and emails in the surrounding community of the senior centre

Total number recruited

n = 17 (2 removed from analysis)

Place of residence

Not reported

Gender

Female 60%

Male 40%

Ethnicity

White (73%), 20% Black/African American (20%)

Other (6%)

Significant difference between groups for education only Older people USA
Detmer (2020) None (Intergenerational music therapy)

Age

3–4years

Recruitment setting

University based child care setting

Total number recruited n = 32 (16 in each group)

Gender

not described

Ethnicity

not reported

Not reported

Age

72–98 years

Recruitment setting

Senior living facility (some personal care unit and some memory care unit)

Total number recruited n = 15

Place of residence

senior living facility (some personal care unit and some memory care unit)

Gender

not described

Ethnicity

not reported

Not reported

Children and/or young people

Older people

USA
George (2011) None (Intergenerational Volunteering)

Age

5–6 years and 11–14 years (range 5–14 years)

Recruitment setting

place of education (The Intergenerational School—TIS)

Total number recruited n = 32 (two classes of 16)

Gender

not described

Ethnicity

not reported

Not reported

Age

INT = Mean 85.7 years (SD 5.97)

CON = Mean 81.4 years (SD 8.2)

Recruitment setting

Place of residence—assisted living facility

Total number recruited n = 15

Place of residence

Assisted living facility

Gender

INT 7 Female 1 Male

CON 6 Female 1 male

Ethnicity

not reported

None Older people USA
Giglio (2006) None

Age

3–4 years

Recruitment setting

Pre‐school classroom from the day care centre in the shared site facility

Total number recruited n = 17

Gender

Female n = 5

Male n = 12

Ethnicity

not reported

Not reported

Age

70–97 years Mean 83.10 (SD 5.75)

Recruitment setting

Place of residence—memory care centre in a nursing home

Total number recruited n = 29

Place of residence

continuous care facility—includes retirement living, assisted living, skilled nursing and memory care services. This population were from the memory care centre which houses those with Alzheimers or dementia

Gender

Ethnicity

not reported

Not reported Older people USA
Gruenewald (2016) Experience Corps

Age

Not reportedelementary schools

Recruitment setting

6 schools

Total number recruited

Not reported

Gender

not described

Ethnicity

not reported

Not reported

Age

60–89 years

Mean 67.4 years (SD 5.9)

Recruitment setting

Community health fairs, senior centres and housing, life care communities, churches, and community organisations; mailings to members of clubs, AARP, and other retiree organisations, senior housing facilities, and senior centres; and targeted radio stations, including public service announcements and

advertising

Total number recruited n = 702 (INT 352, CON 350)

Place of residence

Not reported

Gender

Female 85%

Ethnicity

92% Black/African American

5% White/Caucasian

3% other

Not reported Older people USA
Low (2015) Grandfriends

Age

All 4 years old

Recruitment setting

Preschool class of a childcare centre

Total number recruited n = 21

Gender

Female 48% (n = 10)

Male 52% (n = 11)

Ethnicity

not reported

Not reported

Age

Mean 91 years

Recruitment setting

place of residence (aged care facility)

Total number recruited n = 40

Place of residence

Three aged care facilities

Gender

Female 80% (n = 32)

Male 20% (n = 8)

Ethnicity

not reported

None

Children and/or young people

Older people

Australia
Rook (2003) Foster Grandparent program

Age

Not described

Recruitment setting

Place of residence (state hospital)

Total number recruited Not reported but presumably one for each OP in the intervention group

Gender

not described

Ethnicity

not reported

Not reported

Age

60–92 years Mean 70.52

Recruitment setting

Community group through mailings and phone calls to older people chosen randomly but based on age and economic stratification

Total number recruited n = 180

(52 INT 59 CON)

Place of residence

own home

Gender

Female 65.6%

Ethnicity

Caucasian 90%

Non Caucasian 10%

Some significant differences across 3 study groups including age, chronic health problems, non‐White participants and SES Older people USA
Sakurai (2018) REPRINTS

Age

Not described but children from six elementary schools, three kindergardens and six public child care centres

Recruitment setting

school, kindergarten and public child care centres

Total number recruited

Not reported

Gender

not described

Ethnicity

not reported

Not reported

Age

Overall Mean 68.0 (SD 4.9)

Recruitment setting

Recruited from people involved in the REPRINTS study

Total number recruited n = 177 (only 59 completed all assessments at 6 years)

Place of residence

Own home

Gender

Female 85%

Ethnicity

not reported

Only significant difference in number of years of education Older people Japan
Shkilnyk (1984) None (type of visiting programme)

Age

Mean 12.47 years (Grade 6–8)

Recruitment setting

school

Total number recruited n = 72

Gender

not described

Ethnicity

not reported

Not reported

Age

Mean 84.57 years

Recruitment setting

Nursing care home

Total number recruited n = 54

Place of residence

care home

Gender not reported

Ethnicity

not reported

Not reported

Children and/or young people

Older people

Canada
Sipsas‐Herrmann (2000) SCARE (Student Created Aggression Replacement Education)

Age

11–12 years

Recruitment setting

School

Total number recruited n = 194 (172 remained after attrition)

Gender

Female 102 (92 remained)

Male 92 (80 remained)

Ethnicity

80% anglo

15% Hispanic

5% other

Not reported

Age

INT 60–81 years

CON 60–92 years

Recruitment setting

community and senior centre

Total number recruited

INT 36 CON 37

(18 assigned to the control group and 18 to the SCARE program plus 37 retired senior citizen volunteers (14 male, 23 female) ages 60 to 92, not actively participating in the project were recruited as non‐trainers for the control condition portion of the cross‐generational investigation)

Place of residence

own home

Gender

INT 10 Male 26 Female

CON 14 Male 23 Female

Ethnicity

not reported

Not reported

Children and/or young people

Older people

USA
Thornton (2018) Senior Change makers

Age

Mean 24 years (SD 7.53) college students

Recruitment setting

University through word of mouth, email lists sent to local university students in health‐related fields of study

Total number recruited n = 21

Gender

Female 81%

Male 19%

Ethnicity

33% White non‐Hispanic

None

Age

Mean 75 (SD 9) years

Recruitment setting

Place of residence (senior housing residence)

Total number recruited n = 60

Place of residence

Senior housing residence

Gender

Female 84%

Male 16%

Ethnicity

White non‐Hispanic 70%

Hispanic 10%

African American 11%

American Indian 7%

Asian 5%

None

Children and/or young people

Older people

USA