Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 3;19(4):e1355. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1355

Table 6.

Personal growth.

Title Outcome description N Timepoint Outcome type Intervention Comparison ES (95% CI) SE
Chippendale (2015) Agency 39 1 weeks Continuous Living Legends—reminiscence and sharing Control group—writing self‐story but no sharing 0.63 (−0.02, 1.28) 0.33
Dawson (2017) Self efficacy 17 Continuous Ageless Play—activity sessions in multigenerational park Control group—no contact or exercise

Data unavailable

Self worth 17 Continuous Ageless Play—activity sessions in multigenerational park Control group— no contact or exercise

Data unavailable

Personal growth 17 Continuous Ageless Play—activity sessions in multigenerational park Control group—no contact or exercise

Data unavailable

George (2011) Sense of purpose 15 1 weeks Continuous Volunteering in school (mentoring and small groups work) Control group—education sessions only 0.76 (−0.3, 1.82) 0.54
Sense of usefulness 15 1 weeks Continuous Volunteering in school (mentoring and small groups work) Control group—education sessions only 0.32 (−0.7, 1.34) 0.52
Gruenewald (2016) Generative desire 589 4 months Continuous Experience Corps—volunteering in schools Control group—volunteering but with less potential for intergenerational interaction 0.18 (0.02, 0.34) 0.08
Generative achievement 589 4 months Continuous Experience Corps—volunteering in schools Control group—volunteering but with less potential for intergenerational interaction 0.29 (0.13, 0.45) 0.08
Shkilnyk (1984) Life satisfaction 50 1 weeks Continuous Nursing home visiting programme Control group—no visiting 0.44 (−0.13, 1.01) 0.29
Sipsas‐Herrmann (2000) Generativity 60 1 weeks Continuous SCARE (Student Created Aggression Replacement Education)—aggression reduction program delivered by older people Control group—vocational development program delivered by video 0.80 (0.29, 1.31) 0.26
Ego integrity 60 1 weeks Continuous SCARE (Student Created Aggression Replacement Education)—aggression reduction program delivered by older people Control group—vocational development program delivered by video 0.27 (−0.24, 0.78) 0.26
Thornton (2018) Self efficacy for advocacy 50 1 weeks Continuous Senior change makers—advocacy program Control group—physical activity program (less intergenerational contact) 0.42 (−0.17, 1.01) 0.30

Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; ES, effect size; N, sample size; SE, standard error.